Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 134

Thread: Official VP Debate Thread: Krazy Kamala vs Puritanical Pence

  1. #81
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    11007
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    58,489
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayjami View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    She sucked saggy wrinkled cock so she could eventually get to where she is today. Remember that..
    Can you even get your baby momma to suck that saggy 45 year old cock of yours these days? That must be such a pleasure for her.
    I have a feeling it's in better shape than your saggy 55-year-old cock.

  2. #82
    Diamond PLOL's Avatar
    Reputation
    1092
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5,186
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayjami View Post
    Can you even get your baby momma to suck that saggy 45 year old cock of yours these days? That must be such a pleasure for her.
    I have a feeling it's in better shape than your saggy 55-year-old cock.
    Only one way to settle this debate

  3. #83
    Diamond dwai's Avatar
    Reputation
    1862
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    8,265
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayjami View Post
    Can you even get your baby momma to suck that saggy 45 year old cock of yours these days? That must be such a pleasure for her.
    I have a feeling it's in better shape than your saggy 55-year-old cock.
    Name:  Screenshot_20200810-192806_Gallery.jpg
Views: 312
Size:  371.0 KB

  4. #84

  5. #85
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    11007
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    58,489
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Pretty amazing that Kamala and Biden won't event make the BS promise that they won't pack the court, and then reevaluate later after they win

    Instead, they are risking losing votes because they are so certain they want to do it, and they're afraid to blatantly lie, knowing it will bite them later.

    The answer is pretty obvious.

    I love how Democrats are trying to justifying why this is okay, totally ignoring that it will set a precedent that the party in power will just endlessly pack the court to get the majority they want. It's amazing that this is even up for discussion.

  6. #86
    Platinum nunbeater's Avatar
    Reputation
    544
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,787
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Pretty amazing that Kamala and Biden won't event make the BS promise that they won't pack the court, and then reevaluate later after they win

    Instead, they are risking losing votes because they are so certain they want to do it, and they're afraid to blatantly lie, knowing it will bite them later.

    The answer is pretty obvious.

    I love how Democrats are trying to justifying why this is okay, totally ignoring that it will set a precedent that the party in power will just endlessly pack the court to get the majority they want. It's amazing that this is even up for discussion.
    Yes it's horrible that they would even think of packing the supreme court, the same way that the, uh checks notes, Republicans are currently trying to pack the court. fucking disgusting

     
    Comments
      
      Krypt: post more

  7. #87
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    11007
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    58,489
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by nunbeater View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Pretty amazing that Kamala and Biden won't event make the BS promise that they won't pack the court, and then reevaluate later after they win

    Instead, they are risking losing votes because they are so certain they want to do it, and they're afraid to blatantly lie, knowing it will bite them later.

    The answer is pretty obvious.

    I love how Democrats are trying to justifying why this is okay, totally ignoring that it will set a precedent that the party in power will just endlessly pack the court to get the majority they want. It's amazing that this is even up for discussion.
    Yes it's horrible that they would even think of packing the supreme court, the same way that the, uh checks notes, Republicans are currently trying to pack the court. fucking disgusting
    No they're not.

  8. #88
    Platinum
    Reputation
    533
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    3,785
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by nunbeater View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Pretty amazing that Kamala and Biden won't event make the BS promise that they won't pack the court, and then reevaluate later after they win

    Instead, they are risking losing votes because they are so certain they want to do it, and they're afraid to blatantly lie, knowing it will bite them later.

    The answer is pretty obvious.

    I love how Democrats are trying to justifying why this is okay, totally ignoring that it will set a precedent that the party in power will just endlessly pack the court to get the majority they want. It's amazing that this is even up for discussion.
    Yes it's horrible that they would even think of packing the supreme court, the same way that the, uh checks notes, Republicans are currently trying to pack the court. fucking disgusting
    This dummy doesn’t know what packing the court means....mucho estupido.

  9. #89
    Diamond PLOL's Avatar
    Reputation
    1092
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5,186
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Pretty amazing that Kamala and Biden won't event make the BS promise that they won't pack the court, and then reevaluate later after they win

    Instead, they are risking losing votes because they are so certain they want to do it, and they're afraid to blatantly lie, knowing it will bite them later.

    The answer is pretty obvious.

    I love how Democrats are trying to justifying why this is okay, totally ignoring that it will set a precedent that the party in power will just endlessly pack the court to get the majority they want. It's amazing that this is even up for discussion.
    I think it's more like, they don't want to say they're not going to do it because it'll piss off some of the progressive donors who are giving them money. Trump could probably score some points pushing this point in the next debate but he seems to be afraid to do another debate, which is weird given that he needs a big inflection point miracle to have a chance of winning. But I'm happy to have him opt out.

     
    Comments
      
      BetCheckBet:

  10. #90
    Platinum gauchojake's Avatar
    Reputation
    601
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Zipolite
    Posts
    2,526
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Name:  4342.jpg
Views: 337
Size:  50.4 KB

     
    Comments
      
      Bootsy Collins:
      
      BCR: Never gets old
      
      Krypt:

  11. #91
    Silver JohnCommode's Avatar
    Reputation
    160
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    679
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Pretty amazing that Kamala and Biden won't event make the BS promise that they won't pack the court, and then reevaluate later after they win

    Instead, they are risking losing votes because they are so certain they want to do it, and they're afraid to blatantly lie, knowing it will bite them later.

    The answer is pretty obvious.

    I love how Democrats are trying to justifying why this is okay, totally ignoring that it will set a precedent that the party in power will just endlessly pack the court to get the majority they want. It's amazing that this is even up for discussion.
    There's a simple solution: Senate Republicans can pledge to leave this process to the next Senate and whoever wins the Presidency as they did in 2016 if Senate Democrats pledge not to pack the court should Biden win and they win control of the Senate.

    OR

    Require 60 votes in the Senate for confirmation that probably would result in a more moderate Supreme Court.
    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...ne_144262.html

  12. #92
    Platinum
    Reputation
    533
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    3,785
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnCommode View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Pretty amazing that Kamala and Biden won't event make the BS promise that they won't pack the court, and then reevaluate later after they win

    Instead, they are risking losing votes because they are so certain they want to do it, and they're afraid to blatantly lie, knowing it will bite them later.

    The answer is pretty obvious.

    I love how Democrats are trying to justifying why this is okay, totally ignoring that it will set a precedent that the party in power will just endlessly pack the court to get the majority they want. It's amazing that this is even up for discussion.
    There's a simple solution: Senate Republicans can pledge to leave this process to the next Senate and whoever wins the Presidency as they did in 2016 if Senate Democrats pledge not to pack the court should Biden win and they win control of the Senate.

    OR

    Require 60 votes in the Senate for confirmation that probably would result in a more moderate Supreme Court.
    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...ne_144262.html
    Or call their bluff.

  13. #93
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    11007
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    58,489
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by PLOL View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Pretty amazing that Kamala and Biden won't event make the BS promise that they won't pack the court, and then reevaluate later after they win

    Instead, they are risking losing votes because they are so certain they want to do it, and they're afraid to blatantly lie, knowing it will bite them later.

    The answer is pretty obvious.

    I love how Democrats are trying to justifying why this is okay, totally ignoring that it will set a precedent that the party in power will just endlessly pack the court to get the majority they want. It's amazing that this is even up for discussion.
    I think it's more like, they don't want to say they're not going to do it because it'll piss off some of the progressive donors who are giving them money. Trump could probably score some points pushing this point in the next debate but he seems to be afraid to do another debate, which is weird given that he needs a big inflection point miracle to have a chance of winning. But I'm happy to have him opt out.
    Agree with you about Trump, but I don't agree about them being afraid to piss off the progressive donors. The packing-the-court thing is the biggest shot Trump has right now to push hard and get people doubtful of a Biden/Harris ticket. It's really the only new weapon in his arsenal. The rest of the scare tactics ("you're going to lose your health insurance", "the police will be defunded", "your taxes will go up", etc) aren't getting the job done. Repeating that stuff won't change anything.

    The smart play for Biden is to put and to the court packing nonsense, say he won't do it, and then come up with some bullshit excuse in 2021 if he decides to actually do it. For example, it could be something like, "We weren't going to, but we realized Roe v Wade was very much in danger of being overturned after 49 years, and we had to do something!!!111"

    Progressives hate Trump with a passion and are showing up to vote Biden, even if he promises not to pack the court. That's not a showstopper for his leftist supporters. Biden shouldn't be giving Trump this potential way back into contention. When you open up a big lead, the smart play is to be non-controversial and attempt to avoid anything changing the conversation. This is a mistake on Biden's part.

  14. #94
    Silver JohnCommode's Avatar
    Reputation
    160
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    679
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by Texter View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnCommode View Post

    There's a simple solution: Senate Republicans can pledge to leave this process to the next Senate and whoever wins the Presidency as they did in 2016 if Senate Democrats pledge not to pack the court should Biden win and they win control of the Senate.

    OR

    Require 60 votes in the Senate for confirmation that probably would result in a more moderate Supreme Court.
    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...ne_144262.html
    Or call their bluff.
    Yes, the Dems can certainly just call their bluff and vice versa but I want to give both parties the chance to occupy the moral high ground for the benefit of the nation.

  15. #95
    Platinum
    Reputation
    533
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    3,785
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnCommode View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Texter View Post

    Or call their bluff.
    Yes, the Dems can certainly just call their bluff and vice versa but I want to give both parties the chance to occupy the moral high ground for the benefit of the nation.
    Constitutionalist judges do benefit the nation...keep the other branches in check.

  16. #96
    Platinum Jayjami's Avatar
    Reputation
    1151
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    California
    Posts
    4,271
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayjami View Post
    Can you even get your baby momma to suck that saggy 45 year old cock of yours these days? That must be such a pleasure for her.
    I have a feeling it's in better shape than your saggy 55-year-old cock.
    You might be right about that, but not going to describe my cock ala Mumbles and I’m not going to post a dick pic for comparison.

  17. #97
    Platinum BetCheckBet's Avatar
    Reputation
    998
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,981
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Dems need to drop expanding supreme court at least in this context. I believe its just a threat to get leverage but doing them no good.

    The real problem is a system that allows someone (unelected) to serve for 40-50 years once sworn in. Honestly when you look at the length of time they serve they arguably have more influence than the president of the united states.

  18. #98
    Platinum BetCheckBet's Avatar
    Reputation
    998
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,981
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by PLOL View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Pretty amazing that Kamala and Biden won't event make the BS promise that they won't pack the court, and then reevaluate later after they win

    Instead, they are risking losing votes because they are so certain they want to do it, and they're afraid to blatantly lie, knowing it will bite them later.

    The answer is pretty obvious.

    I love how Democrats are trying to justifying why this is okay, totally ignoring that it will set a precedent that the party in power will just endlessly pack the court to get the majority they want. It's amazing that this is even up for discussion.
    I think it's more like, they don't want to say they're not going to do it because it'll piss off some of the progressive donors who are giving them money. Trump could probably score some points pushing this point in the next debate but he seems to be afraid to do another debate, which is weird given that he needs a big inflection point miracle to have a chance of winning. But I'm happy to have him opt out.
    So True.

    Also it's only weird if you assume Trump is acting with any sort of rationality and not simply driven like an angry child. I mean if he was rational/strategic he wouldn't have consistently attacked foxnews in favour of OAN which has nowhere near the same influence. The fact we are 7 months into a pandemic and people still can;t figure out where Trump stands on COVID 19 tells you just how terrible his messaging has been. The debates were probably his best way to trip Biden up but he's too stubborn to even begin to make allowances for a second debate (Trump has little to lose debating Biden but the reverse certainly not true).

  19. #99
    Diamond
    Reputation
    485
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,913
    Load Metric
    107100690

  20. #100
    Diamond blake's Avatar
    Reputation
    1440
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    5,950
    Load Metric
    107100690
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by PLOL View Post

    I think it's more like, they don't want to say they're not going to do it because it'll piss off some of the progressive donors who are giving them money. Trump could probably score some points pushing this point in the next debate but he seems to be afraid to do another debate, which is weird given that he needs a big inflection point miracle to have a chance of winning. But I'm happy to have him opt out.
    Agree with you about Trump, but I don't agree about them being afraid to piss off the progressive donors. The packing-the-court thing is the biggest shot Trump has right now to push hard and get people doubtful of a Biden/Harris ticket. It's really the only new weapon in his arsenal. The rest of the scare tactics ("you're going to lose your health insurance", "the police will be defunded", "your taxes will go up", etc) aren't getting the job done. Repeating that stuff won't change anything.

    The smart play for Biden is to put and to the court packing nonsense, say he won't do it, and then come up with some bullshit excuse in 2021 if he decides to actually do it. For example, it could be something like, "We weren't going to, but we realized Roe v Wade was very much in danger of being overturned after 49 years, and we had to do something!!!111"

    Progressives hate Trump with a passion and are showing up to vote Biden, even if he promises not to pack the court. That's not a showstopper for his leftist supporters. Biden shouldn't be giving Trump this potential way back into contention. When you open up a big lead, the smart play is to be non-controversial and attempt to avoid anything changing the conversation. This is a mistake on Biden's part.
    I think if he admitted he wasn’t packing the court, it would demoralize his base which you don’t want in advance of the election

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. *** Official GOP Debate Thread (1/14/16) ***
    By tyde in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 01-16-2016, 02:22 AM
  2. Replies: 105
    Last Post: 09-05-2015, 04:40 AM
  3. Replies: 78
    Last Post: 06-29-2014, 04:25 PM
  4. Replies: 114
    Last Post: 10-24-2012, 11:23 PM
  5. Replies: 111
    Last Post: 10-23-2012, 10:08 AM