Proposal: Searles Vs Vegas

[Crowe Diddly]

Dumb idea. Even if vegas is the better player(65-35%) it means he still has a 35% chance of losing money on a bet he already won. Of course you snap accepted, like this means anything anyway. I'd accept it too if I owed somebody money, I'd even accept it against Phil Ivey for fuck sakes.

Why don't you just negotiate a deal. You started @ $75 allegedly & he started @ $250 so there must be some common ground as it was a stupid bet anyway & should have been negotiated down months ago. You look worse the longer this goes on.

Don't try to tell us you've been trying to settle it because you obviously haven't. This is like vegas calling your all-in at the poker table & you racking up & leaving. Players get 86'd for this & if you don't find a resolution I believe you should be too.

Stop with the B/S & find a resolution.

Tony could shed more light on this. I will just say my $75 was a nuisance settlement offer and in no way an admission that I lost. Vegas is approaching this as he won the bet. Thats the fundamental disagreement that will not allow us to get any closer, $75-$250.

So just escrow the full amount. You know, like you've been talking about forever now.