Come on sonatine, don't tell me you've been taken in by this bullshit.
It's impossible to test his model because he doesn't reveal what it is. He adjusts his model to retrofit the stats each time, with no hypothesis about why the numbers mean what they do. A statistical model should be open to examination and testing by outside parties, and should have predictive value rather than be valid only with backtesting (try picking stonks that way and see how far you get).
He predicted Trump would win in 2016, but he also predicted Trump would get 52.5% of the vote when in fact he got 46.1% and won only due to the Electoral College. That is outside the margin of error of any respectable poll. Contrast that to the 2016 polls. Even though most of them got the winner wrong they were within the margin of error. He didn't get it right, he was WAY off and binked a 1-outer.
He predicts 362 electoral votes for Trump this time. That means Trump keeps every state he won in 2016 and peels off 46 more electoral votes. Which states are going to flip blue to red this time to give him 46 more electoral votes? If Trump wins this year he will say he was right, but Trump winning with 280-290 or even the 306 he got in 2016 still means this guy didn't predict jack shit.
Also, it seems he hasn't updated it since the very beginning of the coronavirus pandemic. He lists Trump's approval in the Gallup poll as 49% when it is currently 38%. In fact every year he bases his predictions on the early primaries and then never updates them. Really? He says that strong primary performance predicts strong performance in the general and shows correlation but as we (should) all know, correlation does not imply causation.
His site has many links to articles that make arguments, but have no basis upon which a percentage chance can be calculated. He links to the NY Post saying Trump will benefit from coronavirus as a wartime president (LOL). How does that factor into his model? What is the point of including that if you want a statistical model to be taken seriously?
He says he correctly picked 5/6 elections since 1996. A monkey could do this. 1996, 2004, 2008 and 2012 were all obvious. Then you only have to go 1/2 on 2000 and 2016, which is no better than random.
SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798
PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL
I don't think it is. I could be missing something but it looked like the 10-12% that voted for Trump made a bigger impact than those that didn't vote.
We can only make estimates, but the nerds all seem to agree that if those 10% would've stayed home and everything else stayed the same - Clinton would have won 278 - 260
The disdain they had for Clinton doesn't seem to be there for Biden.
its kinda wild that people dont expect trump to just straight up steal the election, btw.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
"he only won due to the electoral college"
you act like every president hasn't won WITH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE, IT'S NOT LIKE EVERYONE DIDN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS NEEDED TO WIN PRESIDENCY.
TRUMP WON FAIR AND SQUARE AND HE'S GOING TO WIN AGAIN ROFL
biden -159 at my book
:TRAIN
Here’s a slow roll for ya. Supreme Court waits til the last day of its term to turn over their cards.
Supreme Court to rule Thursday 10am. on President Trump's effort to keep taxes, financial records secret.
The justices will be taken into protective custody following their decision
i dont know a single living person who cares at all about trumps taxes.
not one.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
You are not wrong.
I only stumbled onto this by way of Mary Trump’s book and the story of her turning over the Trump Family financial records procured during her lawsuit challenging Papa Fred Trump’s will to the Atlantic.
You gotta make your own fun these days. Chin up captain.
sanlmar top 3 poster
I do. I want maximum embarrassment and suffering so he will continue to destroy himself.
They will also likely reveal crimes for which he can be prosecuted and he should be after he leaves office.
Also, if he loses it is a win for the rule of law which some people still think is important.
SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798
PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)