"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
its such a funny thing tho because i was _positive_ hildawg bum rushed the primaries, like i thought she was just on her gangster and everyone went along with it because a) bernie's not a fucking democrat and b) the dnc isnt about that socialist life so it just kinda made sense to me, i didnt really object, and again i thought it was just fact and that it was also corroborated in the leaked emails.
but try to find something in the leaked emails to back any of that up. i looked, i couldnt find it.
maybe i missed it but mostly i think i was just bent over by some solid .ru agitprop.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
Christchurch: (60 Muslims killed)
- condemnation from the entire Muslim world
- worldwide rallies
- fundraisers
- PM of NZ wears a hijab and speaks Arabic
- minute of silence marked by Islamic call to prayer
Sri Lanka: (hundreds of Christians killed)
- nothing
(((prolly just a jooincidence)))
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
Donna Brazile is not apologizing for leaking CNN debate questions and topics to the Hillary Clinton campaign during the Democratic primary. Her only regret, it seems, is that she got caught
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...llary-clinton/
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
honestly, you make a decent argument. weirdly, it was the same argument i made in this thread like 3 weeks ago, but i apparently flip-flopped on that.
i think you're probably right (or at least i hope you're right) that trump couldn't take actions with the specific intent of obstructing the investigation, regardless of whether or not he was scared of what the investigation would turn up. i.e., even if he had nothing to fear, i don't think he could try to shut down the investigation.
it's weird though, that i've read a few legal authors who seem to think the exact opposite. i still have no idea what "corrupt intent" means.
either way, i guess the problem is that it might be difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that anything trump did was done deliberately to impede the investigation. firing comey is the big one, but even mueller, in his report, indicates that trump fired comey only because comey refused to publicly clear trump to congress. also this was apparently before trump knew he was being investigated, which i didn't realize.
All that being said, it's pretty obvious that mueller thinks an obstruction case could be made. He does note, though, that you don't typically see obstruction charges without an underlying crime, since the "innocence" of the suspect will be used as a hammer by the defense as to the suspect's intent
Who benefits from a war between Christians and Muslims?
Who could it be?
(((Who...could...it...be...)))
You seem to be fixating on only Trump’s firing of Comey. Are you not aware that Mueller laid out a number of other instances of obstruction by Trump *after* that, and after he knew he was being investigated, that meet the definition of “intent”? Watch the Rachel Maddow Show segment provided to see what I mean.
mumbles, Rachel Maddow, the young turks etc are not going to convince anyone on Trump's side because they aren't objective journalists, they are leftist hitmen. the girl from the young turks is hot though, if you're gonna choose anti-conservative crap post her videos and pictures of AOC not that smug dyke maddow
do you think any right winger is ever gonna change your mind by posting Sean Hannity clips or /pol/ screencaps?
Last edited by Zap_the_Fractions_Giraffe; 04-21-2019 at 06:00 PM.
If Maddow were a hot female that showed a little cleavage (or a white guy!) that said all the same words, she would appear way more objective to all the slimy stubborn republicans that "hate that fucking dyke". She's actually very good at explaining shit - you have to be capable of watching an intelligent butch lesbian for more than a couple minutes without losing your mind.
i focus on the firing of comey because it was the most egregious act, and the hardest one for trump to justify.
also i read the actual mueller report and reviewed the facts identified by him as possible obstruction. the other acts are more easily justified.
i'm not telling you i think he didn't want to obstruct the investigation, because i think he did. that doesn't change the fact that he'll never face charges over it
theres no reason for u to say this stuff, we already know what the insta triggered response would be at https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/ which is like half paid trolls
sux that ur not a real person. but maybe u might snap out of it soon, one of my favorite quotes is "when I turned 20 I thought I knew everything, when I turned 30 I realized I didn't know shit"
There are currently 20 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 20 guests)