Time to get on the TRUMP train

[blake]

I feel like he won the battle last night but lost the war. Try explaining all of this crap to your kids. BTW Mitt Romney never looked so good. Ill take a boring middle of the road Republican anyday at this point.

Hillary is a pro-choice moderate Republican, Romney has no magic bullet for that. The fact is, Romney is a born political punching bag; he's the hopes and dreams of the biggest loser joke religion in America and all the magic underwear in the world isnt going to get him past the 'courtesy vote' threshold against anyone to the right of Willie Horton.

counterpoint: trump is the political equivalent of clown shoes and he is still within 4-5 points of beating hillary with 30 days left till the election. any other candidate including mitt would be beating her.

[sonatine]

Hillary is a pro-choice moderate Republican, Romney has no magic bullet for that. The fact is, Romney is a born political punching bag; he's the hopes and dreams of the biggest loser joke religion in America and all the magic underwear in the world isnt going to get him past the 'courtesy vote' threshold against anyone to the right of Willie Horton.

counterpoint: trump is the political equivalent of clown shoes and he is still within 4-5 points of beating hillary with 30 days left till the election. any other candidate including mitt would be beating her.

if that was true, you might have a great point.


but its not true, you dont have a great point, and your attempts to animate the corpse of american conservatism is getting a bit morbid around the edges.

[sonatine]

just to be clear; the issues you think would prevent clinton from gutting romney's core support would not exist if romney was running, because romney would never reduce an election to a ratchet gutter brawl of attrition.

he would challenge her on positions and lose. he would challenge her on experience and lose. then he would fall back on the conservative christian talking points that would keep him on the paid lecture circuit starting november 9th.

i think the mistake youre making is thinking that the clinton we see on stage against today is the same one that we would see on stage vs romney or anyone else. i dont believe it would be. shes basically locked in a cage with a fucking crazy person right now. there are no right moves for her to make beyond letting trump set himself on fire every time he opens her mouth. she cant debate policy with him; he has no policies. she cant debate experience with him; he has none.

and the scariest part of this entire situation is that its the republican party itself thats allowed its non-fringe candidates to be excluded from the party dialog, guaranteeing that our generation might never see a viable conservative candidate ever again.

so when you say 'oh anyone even mitt could beat clinton' i think you have your head in the sand; no one on stage with trump during the primaries was going to have significant advantage over a pro wall street and pro choice secretary of state, and the people capable of representing the republican party as a sane, measured, financially responsible option never got near the stage because Bible/Tea Party/Birtherism/Duck Dynasty is the current republican mission statement.

[BetCheckBet]

jesus

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/firs...digits-n663691

[4Dragons]

I posted a tweet from someone that felt maligned by a presidential candidate. I did not offer commentary on her words or anything else.

I just want it to sit there and needle the people that are the most butthurt about all things women's issues - except when it's against literally anyone who's been raped by Bill Clinton or come against Hillary.

My thoughts on wtf a lawyer does are not any part of the reasoning behind what she said, nor does it matter. What matters is that she put it out there, and for some reason, her pain becomes me not understanding what a lawyer does? You cannot deny her pain, so you try to project a false narrative on me?

You can attempt to shoot the messenger I guess, but it doesn't change that she feels the way she does and I literally dare you to bring it up to her.

You have to take responsibility for what you're posting. She was appointed by a judge to that case and did her sworn duty as an officer of the court. You posting that is just dumb, and pointless.

It obviously effected you on some level, so it's not pointless. That stuff she said really rubbed you the wrong way, and I don't believe that it was the part that she doesn't understand how defense attorneys work. What she said should be gutting to anyone who has children, and speaks to the character of a soulless, Machiavellian, Maoist like Hillary; that literally laughed out loud that she got that guy off with time served.

The point of all of it is to say that if the left can paint anyone that votes for Trump as people that are ok with grabbing pussies, then everyone on the left that votes for Hillary is totally ok with protecting rapists like her husband and what she did as a defense attorney.

[BetCheckBet]

just to be clear; the issues you think would prevent clinton from gutting romney's core support would not exist if romney was running, because romney would never reduce an election to a ratchet gutter brawl of attrition.

he would challenge her on positions and lose. he would challenge her on experience and lose. then he would fall back on the conservative christian talking points that would keep him on the paid lecture circuit starting november 9th.

i think the mistake youre making is thinking that the clinton we see on stage against today is the same one that we would see on stage vs romney or anyone else. i dont believe it would be. shes basically locked in a cage with a fucking crazy person right now. there are no right moves for her to make beyond letting trump set himself on fire every time he opens her mouth. she cant debate policy with him; he has no policies. she cant debate experience with him; he has none.

and the scariest part of this entire situation is that its the republican party itself thats allowed its non-fringe candidates to be excluded from the party dialog, guaranteeing that our generation might never see a viable conservative candidate ever again.

so when you say 'oh anyone even mitt could beat clinton' i think you have your head in the sand; no one on stage with trump during the primaries was going to have significant advantage over a pro wall street and pro choice secretary of state, and the people capable of representing the republican party as a sane, measured, financially responsible option never got near the stage because Bible/Tea Party/Birtherism/Duck Dynasty is the current republican mission statement.

Aside from Cruz, head to head polling tended to favour every major republican candidate in the spring against Clinton. Its hard to imagine things are any different now since Clinton took even more of a nosedive since then with the email controversy.

[BetCheckBet]

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/flash...ry?id=42686582

Days after President Clinton admitted to having an inappropriate relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky, Trump said Clinton was a “victim” and critiqued the physical appearances of various women with whom Clinton had been accused of having extramarital relations at different times.

“It’s like it's from hell, it's a terrible group of people,” Trump said in an interview with FOX News' Neil Cavuto on Aug. 19, 1998.

Asked by Cavuto if Clinton’s image as a “quasi-sex symbol” stood to somehow benefit from the alleged extramarital relations, Trump took issue with the characterization.

“I don't necessarily agree with his victims, his victims are terrible,” Trump said. “He is really a victim himself. But he put himself in that position.”

“The whole group, Paula Jones, Lewinsky, it's just a really unattractive group. I'm not just talking about physical," he said.

“Would it be any different if it were a supermodel crowd?” Cavuto then asked.

“I think at least it would be more pleasant to watch,” Trump replied.

[sonatine]

just to be clear; the issues you think would prevent clinton from gutting romney's core support would not exist if romney was running, because romney would never reduce an election to a ratchet gutter brawl of attrition.

he would challenge her on positions and lose. he would challenge her on experience and lose. then he would fall back on the conservative christian talking points that would keep him on the paid lecture circuit starting november 9th.

i think the mistake youre making is thinking that the clinton we see on stage against today is the same one that we would see on stage vs romney or anyone else. i dont believe it would be. shes basically locked in a cage with a fucking crazy person right now. there are no right moves for her to make beyond letting trump set himself on fire every time he opens her mouth. she cant debate policy with him; he has no policies. she cant debate experience with him; he has none.

and the scariest part of this entire situation is that its the republican party itself thats allowed its non-fringe candidates to be excluded from the party dialog, guaranteeing that our generation might never see a viable conservative candidate ever again.

so when you say 'oh anyone even mitt could beat clinton' i think you have your head in the sand; no one on stage with trump during the primaries was going to have significant advantage over a pro wall street and pro choice secretary of state, and the people capable of representing the republican party as a sane, measured, financially responsible option never got near the stage because Bible/Tea Party/Birtherism/Duck Dynasty is the current republican mission statement.

Aside from Cruz, head to head polling tended to favour every major republican candidate in the spring against Clinton. Its hard to imagine things are any different now since Clinton took even more of a nosedive since then with the email controversy.

personally, and i get that these are ostensibly 'heads up' polls, but personally i think a lot of that was because bernie's white knight schtick really calved off a significant number of people who would otherwise be loyal to hillary.

or, admittedly, im so shocked that a mental toddler drug addict is on the stage with a career politician that i'm over estimating hillary's appeal. that really may well be the case here.

[snake_in_the_ass]

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/flash...ry?id=42686582

Days after President Clinton admitted to having an inappropriate relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky, Trump said Clinton was a “victim” and critiqued the physical appearances of various women with whom Clinton had been accused of having extramarital relations at different times.

“It’s like it's from hell, it's a terrible group of people,” Trump said in an interview with FOX News' Neil Cavuto on Aug. 19, 1998.

Asked by Cavuto if Clinton’s image as a “quasi-sex symbol” stood to somehow benefit from the alleged extramarital relations, Trump took issue with the characterization.

“I don't necessarily agree with his victims, his victims are terrible,” Trump said. “He is really a victim himself. But he put himself in that position.”

“The whole group, Paula Jones, Lewinsky, it's just a really unattractive group. I'm not just talking about physical," he said.

“Would it be any different if it were a supermodel crowd?” Cavuto then asked.

“I think at least it would be more pleasant to watch,” Trump replied.

I agree with Trump. Bill should have been fucking models, not some fat bitch intern.

[BetCheckBet]

Mr Bone

[TheXFactor]

Hillary is a pro-choice moderate Republican, Romney has no magic bullet for that. The fact is, Romney is a born political punching bag; he's the hopes and dreams of the biggest loser joke religion in America and all the magic underwear in the world isnt going to get him past the 'courtesy vote' threshold against anyone to the right of Willie Horton.

counterpoint: trump is the political equivalent of clown shoes and he is still within 4-5 points of beating hillary with 30 days left till the election. any other candidate including mitt would be beating her.

Remember Trump and Romney were friends at least back in 2012 when Trump endorsed Romney and contributed to his campaign.
During the primaries, Trump insulted Romney and blamed him for losing back in 2012, then Romney became his worst enemy.

Do newspaper endorsements matter? I doubt it since people no longer read them.

Do endorsements from members of Congress and Senators matter? Nope, people don't give a shit.

Honestly, people are sick of the Clinton's.
They remember the 90's and Bill Clinton getting blow jobs from White House interns.
They know that Bill & Hillary Clinton are corrupt politicians and would do anything to hold onto power.

This is why Donald Trump still has a chance.

Less than one month left.

[4Dragons]

Mr Bone

Ken Bone, to me, looks like the older fat version of Horatio Sanz

[4Dragons]

Just wondering out loud if Dan Bilzerian has taken this opportunity to start randomly grabbing pussies?

[BetCheckBet]

Ken Bone, the undisputed winner of last night’s debate, despite the fact that he can’t decide whether or not he’s voting for Trump, appeared on CNN this morning wearing the same red sweater he wore last night. He made this fashion choice, he explained, because he split his pants on the way to the debate.

“I had a really nice olive suit, and my mother would have been very proud to see me wearing on television, but apparently I have gained about 30 pounds,” Bone told Carol Costello Monday morning. “And when I went to get in my car the morning of the debate I split the seat of my pants all the way open. So the red sweater is plan B. I’m glad it worked out.”

[BetCheckBet]

[4Dragons]

Just wondering out loud if Dan Bilzerian has taken this opportunity to start randomly grabbing pussies?

Never mind, I have my answer.. thanks Dan, I knew you had it in you.

[blake]

Aside from Cruz, head to head polling tended to favour every major republican candidate in the spring against Clinton. Its hard to imagine things are any different now since Clinton took even more of a nosedive since then with the email controversy.

personally, and i get that these are ostensibly 'heads up' polls, but personally i think a lot of that was because bernie's white knight schtick really calved off a significant number of people who would otherwise be loyal to hillary.

or, admittedly, im so shocked that a mental toddler drug addict is on the stage with a career politician that i'm over estimating hillary's appeal. that really may well be the case here.

yeah i think that's the case here. if not for trump, hillary clinton would be the most disliked and distrusted presidential candidate in history since polling began. those words aren't hyperbole, they are actual facts measured by data. we have never before seen any person with negatives this high get elected. period.

i'm not sure who you think is inspired by a hillary clinton presidency. even liberals loathe the idea of voting for her. (i'm a registered democrat by the way.)

[4Dragons]

personally, and i get that these are ostensibly 'heads up' polls, but personally i think a lot of that was because bernie's white knight schtick really calved off a significant number of people who would otherwise be loyal to hillary.

or, admittedly, im so shocked that a mental toddler drug addict is on the stage with a career politician that i'm over estimating hillary's appeal. that really may well be the case here.

yeah i think that's the case here. if not for trump, hillary clinton would be the most disliked and distrusted presidential candidate in history since polling began. those words aren't hyperbole, they are actual facts measured by data. we have never before seen any person with negatives this high get elected. period.

i'm not sure who you think is inspired by a hillary clinton presidency. even liberals loathe the idea of voting for her. (i'm a registered democrat by the way.)

I have to think that 'tine likes her because that she is so inept with computer security; he sees her as an easy target for a 7 figure contract to do her next completely illegal server security.

[BetCheckBet]

Just wondering out loud if Dan Bilzerian has taken this opportunity to start randomly grabbing pussies?

Never mind, I have my answer.. thanks Dan, I knew you had it in you.

looks like same girl from my city...

https://thedirty.com/gossip/ottawa/f...sold-her-soul/

[sonatine]

personally, and i get that these are ostensibly 'heads up' polls, but personally i think a lot of that was because bernie's white knight schtick really calved off a significant number of people who would otherwise be loyal to hillary.

or, admittedly, im so shocked that a mental toddler drug addict is on the stage with a career politician that i'm over estimating hillary's appeal. that really may well be the case here.

yeah i think that's the case here. if not for trump, hillary clinton would be the most disliked and distrusted presidential candidate in history since polling began. those words aren't hyperbole, they are actual facts measured by data. we have never before seen any person with negatives this high get elected. period.

i'm not sure who you think is inspired by a hillary clinton presidency. even liberals loathe the idea of voting for her. (i'm a registered democrat by the way.)

totally fair.

its funny because my friends with really significant net worths (8+ digits) are becoming increasingly enthusiastic about hillary for the same reason most democrats are not; shes establishment. shes been operating above the partisan turbulence layers for years and definitely isnt looking to rock the boat at a crucial point in our economic evolution.


also,