Chart patterns can be disrupted by changes in the fundamentals. And this one is now likely to take hold, given that it is much more substantial than rumors or name-calling.Originally Posted by Sanlmar
Trump Won Tax Breaks While Donating Tens Of Thousands To Corrupt Official
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57...ushpmg00000063
_____________________________________________
There is the sound of a lot of action between the boys. Seen a lot of offers but can't follow what has been booked. I would enjoy sweating this.
Druff or someone else please summarize what has been done and maybe the terms.
GL
Maybe we'll get a BAP market going
Comments
Tellafriend: Too blind to see.
NaturalBornHustler: HAHAHA BEAT UP ON HILLARY YOU ARE SO FUNNY IT HIRTS
BiffCo99: Totally lost
what is really lol is that none of you pussies will take me up on my offer to wager. Considering im offering above market price that makes it even more LOL
Unrelated to the topic at hand...but I'm sitting in the United Club at the MSP airport and I'm 5 seats over from George Takei and Brad...
Oh my.....
Would you just shut up already. I don't give two fucking shits about your bets I care about the future of the country. I'm now fairly convinced you are mentally deranged with how you won't let this go and feel the need to post about it everyday. You're by far the most annoying poster in this thread.
Anyone with their wagon hitched to the mafia gravy train is going to fight hard for their fake meal ticket that will suddenly vanish sometime in January. I don't blame them, if I was making more money than the market should be giving me i'd vote for the twat too.Would you just shut up already. I don't give two fucking shits about your bets I care about the future of the country. I'm now fairly convinced you are mentally deranged with how you won't let this go and feel the need to post about it everyday. You're by far the most annoying poster in this thread.
I feel like my work is finally being appreciated. ty bifftard. Im thrilled to know that im getting under your skin.Would you just shut up already. I don't give two fucking shits about your bets I care about the future of the country. I'm now fairly convinced you are mentally deranged with how you won't let this go and feel the need to post about it everyday. You're by far the most annoying poster in this thread.
Retard - we already have a bet. I've offered to give you more action. You don't like the terms yet you are the one spewing verbal diarrhea every few minutes telling everyone how certain you are that you are right. Fine, book the action. Otherwise, STFU.
So Trump's solution to inner city crime, is a policy that was found unconstitutional in 2013. Brilliant.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/...source=copyurl
Book her @ -300 when she is -190-200?
Retard - we already have a bet. I've offered to give you more action. You don't like the terms yet you are the one spewing verbal diarrhea every few minutes telling everyone how certain you are that you are right. Fine, book the action. Otherwise, STFU.
This is what you're asking me to do right?
Book her @ -300 when she is -190-200?
This is what you're asking me to do right?
Pussy.
One judge found it to be unconstitutional. An appeals court halted the ruling.
It goes without saying that a huge debate performance by either candidate changes the whole dynamic. Barring that, the coda for this election is going to be that it was there for Trump to win, but his campaign's disorganized ground game will have lost it for him. This series of tweets highlights where they fail.
44m
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
If there's a pro-Trump new voter surge, I'm not seeing it in NC. Since 6/14/15, net reg up 6.8% in Obama counties, 5.2% in Romney counties.
41m
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Since Trump's launch 6/14/15, whites have accounted for only 59.6% of NC's net new registrants (they're a 69.9% share of all registrants).
19m
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Not really seeing pro-Trump surge in FL either. Since '14, net new reg up 4.1% in counties Obama was under 40%. Up 4.7% everywhere else.
16m
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
The biggest FL surge has been in Osceola Co., up 12% since '14. That's mostly Puerto Rican Dems. The Villages (pro-Trump), in 3rd, up 9.7%
23h
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Point being, these "missing white voters" do exist. So far, I just haven't seen much evidence in reg/other data Trump is activating them.
All this talk of a Trump revolution is worthless if you can't convert people answering poll phone calls into actual voters. It's where boots on ground and data win out. Trump's campaign has been improving in keeping him on script, but I don't know if you can catch up on infrastructure at the last minute. Early voting has already started in some of these places. By pretty much every metric like new registration, absentee ballots requested, etc. the groups improving on '12 are not Trump-friendly counties or demographic groups.
As I've said, I see almost no enthusiasm for Clinton where I live. Yet, I've been asked if I'm registered to vote probably 8-10 times walking into various places. Always by Clinton volunteers. Never once by a Trump volunteer. I actually asked a youngish girl if it was smart to be pushing all this voter registration considering I feel my area is skewing Trump. After a little banter where I assured her I'm a Dem, she basically said they're focusing on malls and other places younger and blacker people congregate, plus she conceded they push harder in the urban areas. I golf like 4 or 5 days a week. If Trump had troops, I'd be getting asked if I'm registered there, where he's likely winning 80/20. Or walking into my grocery store in my suburb, where he's likely 70/30, but he doesn't have the troops despite all the noise.
I really think this is why he isn't converting a lot of voters. Hillary rises and falls 7 or 8 points when something goes south, but he struggles to pick up 3% of her loss. It's usually spread among Johnson, Stein, undecided, etc.
Even when her unfavorables grow worse, so does his. Her loss is rarely his gain.
You go on reddit or predictit and its full of Trump comments. Angry people with 30k posts in the last year. Posting around the clock, so it isn't like they have something better to do. If these people really wanted Trump, they could have spent 5% of that time registering their voters rather than spamming message boards with frog memes.
When Bush and Romney were running, I got asked about registration all the time by evangelicals. They may vote his way, but they aren't his troops. His troops are at home posting u mad bro? on message boards.
Trump can possibly win despite a poor plan, but he should have won by way way more if he does, that I know. It's a change election, it's following a two-term Dem, yet he's failed to get anyone to do anything beyond show up at rallies.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
Oh look, a Trump supporter trying to twist the facts with bullshit half truths. What a shock.One judge found it to be unconstitutional. An appeals court halted the ruling.
The policy was found unconstitutional, period.
http://ccrjustice.org/home/press-cen...risk-practices
A separate "remedy" ruling by the same judge ordered the NYPD to implement reforms, including an independent oversight committee. The NYPD appealed that ruling, and was granted a motion to stay pending appeal. But then a couple months later Bill de Blasio was elected, having run on a platform that included implementing pretty much what was in that remedy ruling. So the city withdrew their appeal and the motion to stay became moot.
As of right now, Trump's proposal is unconstitutional. Any lawsuit based on a similar policy can cite the NYPD ruling as precedent and they'll win.
So one of 3 things is true-
Trump doesn't know that stop and frisk was ruled unconstitutional. Making him badly uninformed.
Trump knows and assumes that his idiot supporters don't know, having no plans to actually do anything about it.
Trump knows and doesn't think the Judicial Branch should be able to restrict the Executive Branch.
SCOTUS ruled that stop and frisk is legal.Oh look, a Trump supporter trying to twist the facts with bullshit half truths. What a shock.
The policy was found unconstitutional, period.
http://ccrjustice.org/home/press-cen...risk-practices
A separate "remedy" ruling by the same judge ordered the NYPD to implement reforms, including an independent oversight committee. The NYPD appealed that ruling, and was granted a motion to stay pending appeal. But then a couple months later Bill de Blasio was elected, having run on a platform that included implementing pretty much what was in that remedy ruling. So the city withdrew their appeal and the motion to stay became moot.
As of right now, Trump's proposal is unconstitutional. Any lawsuit based on a similar policy can cite the NYPD ruling as precedent and they'll win.
So one of 3 things is true-
Trump doesn't know that stop and frisk was ruled unconstitutional. Making him badly uninformed.
Trump knows and assumes that his idiot supporters don't know, having no plans to actually do anything about it.
Trump knows and doesn't think the Judicial Branch should be able to restrict the Executive Branch.
Trump doesn't strike me as the type of guy who cares much about the constitution.
No. They ruled that evidence obtained from very shaky searches was admissible in court. The ruling than an overall policy of frisking people because they're black is unconstitutional was not appealed.SCOTUS ruled that stop and frisk is legal.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Reply With Quote
