Pittsburgh -108 at Miami
San Diego +164 vs. Seattle
KC -115 vs. Tampa Bay
Why is everyone betting against the Hawks buffet?
Yumyum
My SD pick is reversed on my book because I tied it to the starting pitchers, and the Seattle pitcher changed.
If your book still let you keep it at the old line, it's a great value.
Otherwise I wouldn't suggest it anymore, though it's not terrible.
Pittsburgh and Miami tied 2-2 in the 8th. KC up 4-2 in the 5th.
Xbox achievement - win a MLB over 21.
Red Sox - Live Total/Orioles - Live Total o21 ½ (-105)
Header: Red Sox @ Orioles - LIVE Total
Scheduled : 06/01/16 7:05 PM (EST)
Accepted: 06/01/16 8:47 PM (EST)
Sport: Baseball - MLB - Live in Game (#392005)
Pitchers: (Fixed), (Fixed)
Ticket #: 144201632
Risk/Win: $105.00/$100.00
Rotation#: 392005/392006
Outcome: Pending
6/2
Arizona +120
Cavs +6
Yes, I know. I was saying that I bet tied to pitchers, to where it drops my bet and returns the money when the pitchers changed (as it did with SD).
I wish I bet "Action", because I would have gone 2-1 yesterday (with SD winning) instead of 1-1.
Here are my picks today:
Arizona (Greinke) at Houston (Keuchel) +126
Boston (Porchello) at Baltimore (Jimenez) Over 9.5 -110
hate betting on marginal pitchers when I cant get a price on them, but cant help myself here...
nicasio (PIT) -105...marlins lineup is dogshit today...no ozuna, no Stanton...only 2 lefties that worry me in that lineup are bour and yelich...and they really don't worry me that much...hoping that the ballpark in Miami will act as a run suppressor if nicasio throws a few bad ones...
EDIT: Stanton is supposedly back in the lineup...im already on it, but that causes me a little pause...
Last edited by GambleBotsChafedPenis; 06-02-2016 at 02:05 PM.
Royals now +165.....I'd say that's a great price on them against a pitcher coming off the DL.
Carrasco is making his first appearance since April 24 when he strained his left hamstring covering first base against Detroit
I wish you could listen to Boston sports talk. Bashing and second guessing Red Sox. I love the summer.
If we are the fellowship of the miserable what must it be like elsewhere?
oh, Jimenez is positively THE WORST.
Reds Rockies: have never bet over 12 in my life but with this pitching you just have to and just shrug if you lose.
[911] BOS RED SOX -1½+135
( R PORCELLO -R / U JIMENEZ -R ) RISKING 200.00 TO WIN 270.00
[911] TOTAL o9½-120 (BOS RED SOX vrs BAL ORIOLES)
( R PORCELLO -R / U JIMENEZ -R ) RISKING 120.00 TO WIN 100.00
[911] BOS RED SOX -123
( ACTION ) RISKING 123.00 TO WIN 100.00
[909] TOTAL o12-120 (CIN REDS vrs COL ROCKIES)
( A SIMON -R / E BUTLER -R ) RISKING 120.00 TO WIN 100.00
Thanks boys for the Red Sox/Orioles over posts. I jumped on it.
You're gonna see some bets in this thread regarding the Sawks. Some degen might bet the Sawks to win or lose.
Ignore them. I see you did.
Stay pure to the basic premise. Treat it like an article of faith. Big offense and dreadful pitching. The Sawks have no other purpose.
2-3 tonight
One word: Urias.
I'd be very worried if I were the Cavs losing like this when Curry and Thompson only combined for 8/27 and 20 points between them both.
Seven guys in double figures and Thompson wasn't one of them.
There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 10 guests)