I'll never make fun of your Sasquatch wife ever again. Goonie Goo GooOriginally Posted by big dick
stop breathing please you massive massive faggot
I'll never make fun of your Sasquatch wife ever again. Goonie Goo Goostop breathing please you massive massive faggot
23 mins in.
Some guy dumps water.
A chick drives in the desert.
Maybe im not watching the same movie you guys watched
Phantom menace> any mad max movie/thread
I'm saying fuck burning man, check this out:
http://www.wastelandweekend.com
Exodus Gods And Kings
Ok so they get a guy literally named Christian to play the ultimate Jew. Not much pisses me off more than British accents for every single 'foreign' language group, but they just said fuck that and everyone used an accent from somewhere in bumfuck Minnesota. Couldn't they at least give the Jews accents like some cats in Brooklyn?
The lack of the BIG ending was really the nail in the sarcophagus for pussified Resting Bitch Face Ramses and reluctant Moses. Not sure i'm totally getting what they were implying by Moses taking a small boy around back of a burning bush and into a cave on a mountain where nobody could see the both of them, but it doesn't sit right with me. At least the costumes were rad.
How amazing would this movie have been if they gave it the Passion of the Christ treatment though?
2 stars.
I always herd that Raging Bull was a great movie but never watched it until recently. Likely this was the movie that put Martin Scorsese on the road to becoming a legend in the film making industry.
a young DeNiro was shredded and fucking at the top of his game
Pesci is easily one of my top 10 favourite actors oddly plays Jake LaMotta's relatively level headed brother
you know you are watching a good movie when you wince and look away during intense seines
would watch again fairly soon.
Last edited by Baron Von Strucker; 05-01-2016 at 07:54 PM.
all hail Hydra
Originally Posted by DanDruff:Since I'm a 6'2" Republican with an average-sized nose and a last name which doesn't end with "stein", "man", or "berg", I can hide among the goyim and remain undetected unless I open my mouth about money matters.
I watched he original Ghostbusters earlier today just so I'd remember how shitty it actually was.
(•_•) ..
∫\ \___( •_•)
_∫∫ _∫∫ɯ \ \
always wanted to watch this but never did, hmm might give it a go
I'm in for the tittys
Just catching up on the last 6 months. I've been binge watching..
Predestination:
failed at the box office but a really good movie..
Captain America, winter soldier...
A really good conservative movie series..
Fantastic four...
Bad reviews but did a much better job explaining there origins. Not bad.
Super man v Batman...
Bad . laughable. Really bad..
Deadpool..
My new favorite..
Insidious 3..
Boring...
A heads up guys. The last instalment of the phantasm series "phantasm ravanger" is coming out soon.. If you get a chance Bing watch it from the beginning.
Last edited by thesparten; 05-15-2016 at 01:58 PM.
Watched "The Insider" (Al Pacino, Russell Crowe) at like 4 AM Today. Was the first time seeing it and actually shocked that I never even heard of it prior to Today as I thought that I've seen every one of Pacino's movies.
Was decent and worth a watch, but not great and ending wasn't satisfying.
Last edited by VegasJim; 05-15-2016 at 02:07 PM. Reason: typo*
Per the real story, the director took some liberties with the story to jack up the drama, but not so much the ending. So you have to give him credit for not telling a tall tale at the end to make it more satisfying.
_____________________________________________
Were you stoned? If not, you pretty much wasted two hours.
_____________________________________________
Ghostbusters was great..
I wonder why the fat boys only made one movie?(disorderlies).
Layer Cake and Deadpool
I forgot to mention this movie.. Liked mad Max and road warrior but this makes the postman look good. I actually liked the postman.
Post apocalyptic lone wolf movies are so played. It's more of dystopian global governance trend. At least that's more believable.
Are you fucking serious? Is that the actual poster for this movie? I'm glad I didn't waste my time watching this claptrap. Because the anachronisms would have spitting up blood. Here's an example mentioned by notes at IMDB that I saw watching the trailer, but immediately found suspect per Moses armor (which is made from iron, not bronze).
Exodus Gods And Kings
Ok so they get a guy literally named Christian to play the ultimate Jew. Not much pisses me off more than British accents for every single 'foreign' language group, but they just said fuck that and everyone used an accent from somewhere in bumfuck Minnesota. Couldn't they at least give the Jews accents like some cats in Brooklyn?
The lack of the BIG ending was really the nail in the sarcophagus for pussified Resting Bitch Face Ramses and reluctant Moses. Not sure i'm totally getting what they were implying by Moses taking a small boy around back of a burning bush and into a cave on a mountain where nobody could see the both of them, but it doesn't sit right with me. At least the costumes were rad.
How amazing would this movie have been if they gave it the Passion of the Christ treatment though?
2 stars.
http://m.imdb.com/title/tt1528100/goofs
Anachronisms
The plot rotates around twin blades given by old king to his two sons. The swords are leaf-shaped, about 3 ft long and made of steel. This is a dual anachronism:
1. Blade shape is wrong. Egyptian royalty at this time had a distinct melee weapon called khopesh - a sickle-shaped broadsword, that had a single slashing edge. Leaf blades were not used in Egypt in the 2nd millennium BC, they are a distinct feature of Celtic smiths of the Bronze Age.
2. Blade metal [and Moses armor] is wrong. At this time the only material used for blades was bronze - it's still Bronze Age. First reliable evidence of iron metallurgy appears only a few centuries later, circa 11th cent BC. Iron blades 3 ft long required amount of metal and technologies that became available no sooner than 8th cent. BC. Steel of quality shown on screen appears only in 8-9th cent. AD - 2000 years after the film events.
_____________________________________________
Good point.... I read at the end that parts of the movie have been fictionalized for dramatic effect. I am going to try and find a documentary of the events from 1999 when it all took place, hopefully even find the real 60 minutes that it aired. I think if I knew the backstory prior to watching the movie, I would have appreciated it more. I was only 11 in 1999.Per the real story, the director took some liberties with the story to jack up the drama, but not so much the ending. So you have to give him credit for not telling a tall tale at the end to make it more satisfying.
Has anyone seen something on Netflix called YOUNG DOCTORS NOTEBOOK?
Someone said its hilarious, and a dark comedy series. John Hamm is in it.
wondering if its worth the time
Also, depictions of Ramses II fighting at the Battle of Kadesh show him wearing BRONZE armor plates, NOT gold. Gold thick enough to be decent protective armor would be ridiculously heavy.
Read more: http://m.touregypt.net/featurestorie...#ixzz48q1On81WBody armor
Because of the climate, very little armor was ever worn in Africa. In Egypt's Old and Middle Kingdom, Egyptian soldiers never wore armor. In the Old Kingdom they are usually depicted wearing only a belt and a small triangular loincloth. During the Middle Kingdom, their apparel was invariably the same short linen kilt as that worn by civilian workmen. Hence, from the late Predynastic Period to the Middle Kingdom, Egyptian soldiers at best only wore an occasional band of webbing across the shoulders and chest.
Ramesses II in battle on his chariot, wearing armor.
Sometimes broad leather bands covered part of the torso of charioteers, but generally soldiers are depicted without any body protection. Again the pharaohs were, not surprisingly, the exception. Ramesses II fighting as a charioteer was portrayed wearing scale armor with sleeves, covering the whole torso. The scales were bronze, attached through holes to a skirt. His legs were of course protected by the chariot. However, even he is not always shown wearing armor. It might be presumed that other charioteers who could afford the expensive armor might also have worn it. Yet, even pharaohs, though they almost always are depicted wearing the blue crown, did not always wear armor. For example, portrayals of Seti I clearly show him without any body armor in battle.
P.S. Go ahead and red rep me. Just shows you to be a Philistine.
_____________________________________________
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Reply With Quote
