Seems like a good idea to me.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...aborative_2_na
Seems like a good idea to me.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...aborative_2_na
If it's fair the right will reject the idea. Cheating and disinformation are keys to the rights future political survival, imo. Convincing 50% of voters that they're in the 1% is a tough sell.
So if a computer district gets split between 2/multiple states who gets the electoral vote?
I didn't read the article so I don't know if that was covered.
It's certainly better than the current system and also has no chance of happening.
The same thing was true of Texas until the GOP took control of the statehouse by the early 2000s. Texas had been a solid Dem state for decades and had gerrymandered the shit of it. Here's just recent history.
http://m.mysanantonio.com/opinion/co...me-5907532.php
seems to me like it would take a constitutional amendment to pull this off. You may find a handful of states willing to do this on their own, but asking elected officials to change the mechanism by which they won office seems highly unlikely.
This post was brought to you by former Massachusetts Governor and 5th US Vice President Elbridge Gerry.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)