Pretty interesting.
How Paris ISIS Terrorists May Have Used PlayStation 4 To Discuss And Plan Attacks
http://www.forbes.com/sites/insertco...-plan-attacks/
Belgian federal home affairs minister Jan Jambon said outright that the PS4 is used by ISIS agents to communicate, and was selected due to the fact that it’s notoriously hard to monitor. “PlayStation 4 is even more difficult to keep track of than WhatsApp,” he said.
old but still:
Can't be a real post from a hetero sexual male in his early 20's. Just can't be.Originally Posted by Krypt
Could you please change your avatar? It is rather obscene...
Shhhhhheeeeiiiiiit, we were using Xbox live to talk to the homies in Arcata in 2006.
Article from The onion back in March 2003
http://www.theonion.com/multiblogpos...st-regio-11534
This War Will Destabilize The Entire Mideast Region And Set Off A Global Shockwave Of Anti-Americanism
George W. Bush may think that a war against Iraq is the solution to our problems, but the reality is, it will only serve to create far more.
This war will not put an end to anti-Americanism; it will fan the flames of hatred even higher. It will not end the threat of weapons of mass destruction; it will make possible their further proliferation. And it will not lay the groundwork for the flourishing of democracy throughout the Mideast; it will harden the resolve of Arab states to drive out all Western (i.e. U.S.) influence.
If you thought Osama bin Laden was bad, just wait until the countless children who become orphaned by U.S. bombs in the coming weeks are all grown up. Do you think they will forget what country dropped the bombs that killed their parents? In 10 or 15 years, we will look back fondly on the days when there were only a few thousand Middle Easterners dedicated to destroying the U.S. and willing to die for the fundamentalist cause. From this war, a million bin Ladens will bloom.
And what exactly is our endgame here? Do we really believe that we can install Gen. Tommy Franks as the ruler of Iraq? Is our arrogance and hubris so great that we actually believe that a U.S. provisional military regime will be welcomed with open arms by the Iraqi people? Democracy cannot possibly thrive under coercion. To take over a country and impose one's own system of government without regard for the people of that country is the very antithesis of democracy. And it is doomed to fail.
A war against Iraq is not only morally wrong, it will be an unmitigated disaster.
LordofTheFraud that post wasn't some revelation back in 2003. That was common sense, put on a message board.
Most knew that was the dynamic in play when it all started to go bad after 9/11, which was the real jumping off point and will be forever. The problem today though, unlike back then in 2003 and 2011 is we have more enemies, and have had the time to get here now. It's also a big reason 'closing the borders' is an important issue to anyone who wants to become the next President. Rubio would leave the floodgates open, Trump would build a wall, differing opinions but very important issues at the core. It all stems back to this, terrorists, fundamentalists and their desire to inflict harm on the West. Although you really can't mess with the West, and not expect to get the best. We are in might, intelligence, wealth, sophistication, ability etc...
That probably also contributes as to why we are such huge targets, and always will be now for the radicals. The real threat these days as far as we are concerned in the U.S. is homegrown. or ones who got here undetected in past some years, and have already infiltrated our borders (ISIS/terrorists etc). I don't think they are though, because they would have attacked us here, and not France if they could have. Obviously they aren't capable of that now, but i'd bet the whole lot as we speak they are somewhere, and actively plotting here. Hopefully we get them first.
It's a whole different world we all live in now with regard to risk, and threat from radical and fundamental islamists.
Garrett arguing with an Onion article is the perfect example of the American political environment right now.
Explain this some more please.
I don't care who wrote it, or what publication it came from. In 2003 that is literally common fucking sense to anyone aware. So do me a favor, and enlighten me to what you're implying here.
Thanks
Shut up, Garrett.
Explain this some more please.
I don't care who wrote it, or what publication it came from. In 2003 that is literally common fucking sense to anyone aware. So do me a favor, and enlighten me to what you're implying here.
Thanks
Exactly...ISIS goal is rule as caliphate, they want to have the Islamic State as a unified entity under one ruler. This is why Iran is against them, because Iran also wants caliphate, with the caveat that Iran and the Mullahs will rule over the unified desert. So to answer the posed question, ISIS doesn't want to be anyone's bff, they want to rule it. Whatever propaganda gets them there is for the rubes to consume.
All of this shit dates back to Saladin... hence France.
But they will use any excuse for their being offended. If not this then that. The perpetual offended group as to grow up and accept other person,s culture. They won't... at this point who care what there mad at this week or last or next week..
If we gave them the world and move to an island, they would attack the infidel island. There rabid. Unfortunately they are leaving us only one way to deal with them and that is mass destruction of there population and income earning facilities and whatever infrastructure they do have..fight them the way Clinton fought Serbia..(lol)..
And this immigration to western culture,s is insidious. Doesn't take a detective 1st grade to figure out we are either being naive in allowing this or our leaders are helping them in our own demise..
And if any of u rabid liberal who have a total disconnect with reality disagree with this rational and level headed post,,,, your insane..
Last edited by thesparten; 11-16-2015 at 08:11 AM.
ISIS must be LOLing their faces off right now at all of the apologists yelling, "If America and the rest of the west hadn't treated Muslims so poorly, none of this would have happened!"
As already mentioned here, ISIS' goal seems to be ruling their region and establishing a hard-line Islamic fundamentalist regime.
ISIS is using past "mistreatment" of Muslims as propaganda to get recruits, but that's not at all a requirement to recruit. It's just an easy and convenient way to go about it. As they control the message, ISIS can recruit in many ways, including lying about conspiracies to wipe out Islam or claims that the west's decadent ways are taking over the world and infecting humanity like a virus.
It's a huge stretch to claim, "Because we did X in the past, now ISIS is doing Y."
Islamic fundamentalist groups are all about power and religious fanaticism, and are not peace-loving people who are just fighting back. They would be attacking us regardless, and their recruits are confused or hopeless souls who could have otherwise been brainwashed in so many different ways.
It's all this guys fault
His deals with the Saudi's set this whole thing up, that and the Afghanistan proxy war with the Russians. Those dolts wouldn't have enough sheckles to buy bullets for their AK's if that guy hadn't f'd up the whole planet.. for oil.
So I'm reading that there was three suicide bombers who blew themselves up at different locations - yet only one civilian was killed as a result. Can someone explain the rationale behind this, considering that the idea is to set the bomb off and take a load of innocents down with them?
I always thought suicide mission stories were a load of bs, because of natural survival instinct (don't tell me they do it as they're promised 72 virgins in heaven), but at least in the 9/11 narrative they do it in a spot where they could legit take down mass lives.
Considering the coordinated attack, the bombs may have been remotely detonated or on timers with no off switch. So basically if you're not in position when the thing goes off, you hit nothing. I have no idea if that's the case, but it seems plausible that the coordinator would do something like that to ensure that the bomber doesn't change their mind and just run away. The people who do blow themselves up are usually not really big brain trusts to begin with.
Well, you seem to have covered all bases there.
Still reads like fiction to me:
"The guard—who asked to be identified only by his first name, Zouheir—said the attacker was discovered wearing an explosives vest when he was frisked at the entrance to the stadium about 15 minutes into the game. France was playing an exhibition against Germany inside.
While attempting to back away from security, Zouheir said, the attacker detonated the vest, which was loaded with explosives and bolts, according to Paris prosecutor François Molins. Zouheir, who was stationed by the players’ tunnel, said he was briefed on the sequence by the security frisking team at the gate.
A police officer confirmed the sequence, adding that police suspect the attacker aimed to detonate his vest inside the stadium in order to provoke a deadly stampede.
Around three minutes later, a second person also blew himself up outside the stadium. A third suicide attacker detonated explosives at a nearby McDonald’s, police said. One civilian died in the attacks, police said."
http://www.wsj.com/articles/attacker...way-1447520571
I didn't know that they frisk 80,000 people as they enter the stadium too. And you'd think that if he had a ticket, and was planning to do it inside the stadium, that he'd have already been in there instead of being outside 15 mins into the game.
The President of France was in the stadium. They frisked everybody.
Serious question, Muslim chicks give up the pussy to non Muslims?
I have never knowingly saw a Muslim IRL.
Id also like an answer to this question.
You can't get past their brothers. They watch their sisters like hawks.
The men weigh 135lbs just bitch slap them and then go and fuck their sister after you're done slapping
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
