Originally Posted by garrett
The logic is pretty self-explanatory. Also in the end, I was right all along about the ROI needed to be profitable to a backer at 50/50 while others were not.
I never played much tournament poker. I played cash games. For a living.
Meaning I supported myself solely through poker, for over a year. I was a professional poker player, can you say the same?
Honestly, I am about to get real here now with you Daredevil.
So you played 'cash games' for 1 whole year, which are completely untraceable OTHER than via your TAX RETURNS!
And you want to go play a big field WSOP MTT. Some of the largest fields in poker, with no evidence of a big field MTT background let alone success. And not think that is lighting fire to a buy in, based off your admission on no MTT background.
lol and you think I am some slimeball/scammer. Do you have a fuckign clue, not everyone here who isn't posting or chiming in like your 5 friends, dislike me. I mean really its like a handful of you all, saying all this bad stuff.
Here I prove you are the least suspect and shady, and you come at me with that. You better step up your game Mr., I played cash games for 1 year 'professionally' (lol) but have no evidence of it is your line to getting a stake, or is it the whole reason you are on radio???
Provide some tax returns, and lets see if you really won, or even claimed, what you claim you won. Through all of this, you are still failing to see or want to understand, I am no fool. You say and post A LOT more foolish stuff than I do. I know that might hurt your feelings but that is the truth!
How you cant fathom this is viewed as a freeroll is mind boggling. If Garrett wins, he doesnt get paid. There is about a 0% chance. But if you win, there is at least a 50/50 chance of you getting paid. Or Garrett is banned. So either way you win. So the only possible outcomes are you lose but dont lose $$, you win and get paid, you win and Garrett gets banned. In none of those scenarios do you lose money. Therefore thats a free roll by definition- you couldnt loseMy stance is that he lied, if I knew he was lying or not doesnt really matter does it?
And what sort of freeroll was I on? was the rest of the forum collecting the winnings or covering my losses?
It's hilarious that we as a society think everyone can be a dr, a lawyer, an engineer. Some people are just fucking stupid. Why can't we just accept that?
Im not sure how asking the forums opinion on staking deals can possibly be considered scamming?How DARE you call me a scammer when that is the scammiest thread I have read on here ever (aside from all of Jaseps)!
http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sho...unknown-player
http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sho...unknown-player
And thats coming from a guy who LIED ABOUT ESCROWING!!
It's hilarious that we as a society think everyone can be a dr, a lawyer, an engineer. Some people are just fucking stupid. Why can't we just accept that?
You're the self proclaimed best poker player on this site, but with no proven results dude. Why dont you show some proof?
It's hilarious that we as a society think everyone can be a dr, a lawyer, an engineer. Some people are just fucking stupid. Why can't we just accept that?
Im not sure how asking the forums opinion on staking deals can possibly be considered scamming?
And thats coming from a guy who LIED ABOUT ESCROWING!!
Exactly, I started a discussion about staking arrangements in today's poker environment. We talked about it on the forum, and I disagreed with some people about what was fair. No stake was ever given.
So ironically, I couldn't agree to terms with anyone, so no arrangement was ever made. Whereas, garrett did agree to terms with someone, and then broke those terms, and lied about it.
It's so cut and dry it's amazing that garrett thinks anyone will fall for this misdirect.
You are absolutely lying now with this generic expected response. And you expect us all to just believe this.
Exactly, I started a discussion about staking arrangements in today's poker environment. We talked about it on the forum, and I disagreed with some people about what was fair. No stake was ever given.
So ironically, I couldn't agree to terms with anyone, so no arrangement was ever made. Whereas, garrett did agree to terms with someone, and then broke those terms, and lied about it.
It's so cut and dry it's amazing that garrett thinks anyone will fall for this misdirect.
From your opening 2 sentences you wrote:
I mentioned on the radio show last night that I will be in Vegas this summer, and while I can't sell "pieces" of myself for the WSOP (since I'm not planning on playing any events), I would be open to people(s) staking me into one.
'I started a discussion about staking arrangements in today's poker environment'
Honestly you wreak of shady!
Garrett, the question we all want answered is what did you get mom with the 63 bucks?
Conveniently you leave out the next few sentences:You are absolutely lying now with this generic expected response. And you expect us all to just believe this.
From your opening 2 sentences you wrote:
I mentioned on the radio show last night that I will be in Vegas this summer, and while I can't sell "pieces" of myself for the WSOP (since I'm not planning on playing any events), I would be open to people(s) staking me into one.
'I started a discussion about staking arrangements in today's poker environment'
Honestly you wreak of shady!
You see where you is asking everyone's opinion on what would be fair. Its called a discussion. Oh shit, whats that, you mean to tell me he OPENLY ADMITS HE CANT PROVE HE WON AT CASH and therefore him saying it doesnt matter? SCAMMER!!
Seriously, Garrett, shut it the fuck down. No one will side with you here, not even Druff. You literally lied about paying money, and you have the audacity to call a guy a scammer for starting a conversation?
It's hilarious that we as a society think everyone can be a dr, a lawyer, an engineer. Some people are just fucking stupid. Why can't we just accept that?
Answer to this, 'Daredevil'. No deflecting from this by searless lol!
You are absolutely lying now with this generic expected response. And you expect us all to just believe this.
From your opening 2 sentences you wrote:
I mentioned on the radio show last night that I will be in Vegas this summer, and while I can't sell "pieces" of myself for the WSOP (since I'm not planning on playing any events), I would be open to people(s) staking me into one.
'I started a discussion about staking arrangements in today's poker environment'
Honestly you wreak of shady!
Garrett, this incredibly weak attempt to deflect the real issues at hand here are extremely transparent. No one cares about Daredevil's previous staking thread, and no one sees it the way you do. Simply put, this deflection will not work and frankly only makes you look worse than you already do.
The best thing you could do at this point is man up and admit you are guilty of lying to try to gain immediate action from adamantium. Of course you won't do this because you are obviously a dishonest, alcoholic train wreck who doesn't have the balls to man up to anything, and would rather continue lying instead of facing the obvious truth that is as evident to everyone here. You can write another 100 long winded posts deflecting and lying, it won't matter. Not one person here will be swayed by your bullshit.
You're acting like a 13 year old who thinks he is smarter than everyone and can lie his way out of any situation, when in reality all you're doing is digging a deeper and deeper hole for yourself.
Of course I know you will respond with another typical rant of yours with more deflection, but I'm hoping a miracle happens here and you gain some sort of common sense and man up.
You have to be a man to man up though, and it's very obvious you are just a boy living in a man's body.
Exactly, I started a discussion about staking arrangements in today's poker environment. We talked about it on the forum, and I disagreed with some people about what was fair. No stake was ever given.
So ironically, I couldn't agree to terms with anyone, so no arrangement was ever made. Whereas, garrett did agree to terms with someone, and then broke those terms, and lied about it.
It's so cut and dry it's amazing that garrett thinks anyone will fall for this misdirect.
What does any of this have to do with you Daredevil?
except that you encouraged adamantium to freeroll Garrett for forum lulz and he did
and everybody thought Garrett would suck and he didn't
Garrett never explicitly agreed to any terms about the escrow.
He told adamantium to trust that he would get paid if he won and then adamantium gave up on his insistence on escrow
Daredevil owes Garrett $50 for the win
adamantium should not be entitled refund of his $50 because he knew what he was getting into
Shut it the fuck down, Vegas.
Its becoming more and more obvious as the pages roll on, your little click of like 5 or so PFA posters, plus your dupes, are trying to control this entire mele.
Wrenchjockey the convicted felon. You, handicapme, SrslySirius LOL etc..
Its laughable at this point, you handful of rubes are trying to run a smear campaign on me. Shut it the fuck down is what you all should do. The more it goes on with the 5 or so of you neg reppin me, then being the only ones to respond to this thread+dupes, means you all are WEAK and pathetic!
So I said I would be open to a stake, and then asked about staking in general, and what terms the forum would think were fair. Not just for me but for any unknown player.
Yes if people overwhelmingly agreed with me on fair terms, and someone wanted to stake me, I would've taken a stake.
Again, that has nothing to do with this. And you've made no point here.
It's hilarious that we as a society think everyone can be a dr, a lawyer, an engineer. Some people are just fucking stupid. Why can't we just accept that?
Literally everyone in this thread ran out of rep negging Garrett.
No you DID NOT, you implied that you had just brought it up as some sort of 'poker discussion' when it is clear as day, since you prefaced that entire conversation with the fact you would TAKE a stake, what your intent was!
I'll agree with you on one thing. This isn't about me. You and garrett keep trying to make it about me. Because you think it distracts from the truth about him being a scammer, and you being.... well I don't even know, a scammers dingleberry?
What does any of this have to do with you Daredevil?
except that you encouraged adamantium to freeroll Garrett for forum lulz and he did
and everybody thought Garrett would suck and he didn't
Garrett never explicitly agreed to any terms about the escrow.
He told adamantium to trust that he would get paid if he won and then adamantium gave up on his insistence on escrow
Daredevil owes Garrett $50 for the win
adamantium should not be entitled refund of his $50 because he knew what he was getting into
Shut it the fuck down, Vegas.
Its becoming more and more obvious as the pages roll on, your little click of like 5 or so PFA posters, plus your dupes, are trying to control this entire mele.
Wrenchjockey the convicted felon. You, handicapme, SrslySirius LOL etc..
Its laughable at this point, you handful of rubes are trying to run a smear campaign on me. Shut it the fuck down is what you all should do. The more it goes on with the 5 or so of you neg reppin me, then being the only ones to respond to this thread+dupes, means you all are WEAK and pathetic!
Have you ever admitted you were wrong about something Garrett?
This post above is very typical of someone who needs to justify something in his own head to the point of insanity just to make it fit his side of things.
Fact is there are no dupes, there are more people that just "5" of us, and you are dead fucking wrong here. But go ahead and keep trying to justify this bullshit.
Boy.
Conveniently you failed to mention how he lied 3 times, even insinuating he had backers that didn't want to be exposed.
What does any of this have to do with you Daredevil?
except that you encouraged adamantium to freeroll Garrett for forum lulz and he did
and everybody thought Garrett would suck and he didn't
Garrett never explicitly agreed to any terms about the escrow.
He told adamantium to trust that he would get paid if he won and then adamantium gave up on his insistence on escrow
Daredevil owes Garrett $50 for the win
adamantium should not be entitled refund of his $50 because he knew what he was getting into
Your argument fails as soon as you decide to leave out important facts just to fit your side of things.
Feel free to throw me that inevitable red rep now considering that is the best retort you will have at this point.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote