"For what it's worth" so long as I'm home and can get on my PC I'll play any of you degens for $50 In PLO anytime you want.
"For what it's worth" so long as I'm home and can get on my PC I'll play any of you degens for $50 In PLO anytime you want.
He wasn't insta-banned coz he brings hits like Tyde.
He only played Adamantium coz everyone else told him to fuck off till he escrowed.
Druff you joked he wouldn't roll anyone for a 2 figure sum....... He's already asked for it back!!!!!
cmoney :It would be nice if Mexico could simply get human feces out of its drinking water
On the face of it, this could reasonably be explained as an innocent mistake.Originally Posted by Dan Druff
If you take into account the history of dishonesty, angle shooting, backing out, etc. it's very hard to give benefit of doubt and assume good intentions.
I can't even believe what I'm reading here.
Does Garrett have nudes of you or something?
The fucking gold in this 1 post is so epic. Holy shit.
yeah.
Last edited by sonatine; 05-09-2015 at 10:12 PM.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
Not only should his history be taken into account, but even if there was no history, I don't see how this could reasonably be explained as an innocent mistake.On the face of it, this could reasonably be explained as an innocent mistake.
If you take into account the history of dishonesty, angle shooting, backing out, etc. it's very hard to give benefit of doubt and assume good intentions.
He said the money had been sent. Not that he was good for it, not that you could trust him, but that it was sent.
Also he said it was sent by his backers, what happened to these mystical creatures? Because after he wins he pms Druff about having a hard time getting money off some other site. No mention of what happened to the "backers"...
So we got two blatant lies for the price of one. But he's not a scammer because?.....
So everyone wants the biggest train wreck ever to be banned?
all hail Hydra
Originally Posted by DanDruff:Since I'm a 6'2" Republican with an average-sized nose and a last name which doesn't end with "stein", "man", or "berg", I can hide among the goyim and remain undetected unless I open my mouth about money matters.
This will all start to make sense when druff reveals his plan to start fast food chicken franchises in the southwest.
Poker fraud alert indeed.
Because he's a lying patricidal scammer?
get your facts straight broseph, it was only attempted patricide
Maybe I am just not aware of similar incidents.On the face of it, this could reasonably be explained as an innocent mistake.
If you take into account the history of dishonesty, angle shooting, backing out, etc. it's very hard to give benefit of doubt and assume good intentions.
When did he ever scam or attempt to scam anyone here in the past?
Were there any other incidents where he actually bet money here with people that he either didn't have or didn't escrow?
Look, obviously the guy is living from hand to mouth and tried to play this one "on credit", figuring he would get the money to me later if he lost. That's why I didn't pay him. But the bottom line is that he did send me a legitimate looking exchange with the DFS people regarding his withdrawal, and nobody here has ever lost a single penny to anything he's done, right?
It's hard to ban him just because he said he escrowed $50 and then sent it days later. There was no chance that this trick was going to work, as I wasn't going to pay him after winning. So this was actually a negative freeroll for him.
I will keep an eye out for similar circumstances, but unless I'm missing something, this isn't a bannable situation.
With that said, he does need to cool down with the threads/posts because he has been dominating the forum lately.
From what I've seen Druff he has pulled enough BS on other staking sites to be banned. Srsly posted some links that garret has conveniently avoided. He has pulled some shit here before too, which was evident by other posts in this thread.Maybe I am just not aware of similar incidents.
When did he ever scam or attempt to scam anyone here in the past?
Were there any other incidents where he actually bet money here with people that he either didn't have or didn't escrow?
Look, obviously the guy is living from hand to mouth and tried to play this one "on credit", figuring he would get the money to me later if he lost. That's why I didn't pay him. But the bottom line is that he did send me a legitimate looking exchange with the DFS people regarding his withdrawal, and nobody here has ever lost a single penny to anything he's done, right?
It's hard to ban him just because he said he escrowed $50 and then sent it days later. There was no chance that this trick was going to work, as I wasn't going to pay him after winning. So this was actually a negative freeroll for him.
I will keep an eye out for similar circumstances, but unless I'm missing something, this isn't a bannable situation.
With that said, he does need to cool down with the threads/posts because he has been dominating the forum lately.
Obv a ban is probably more extreme than you are willing to go here, but this offense is definitely worthy of a scammatar. Given the fact that garret is pining for action with practically every post he makes, it only makes sense IMO that other people who don't pay close attention to what goes on around here need to be warned of this shadiness.
The dude straight up lied to get the action Druff, repeatedly. You can say what you want about what you think would have been the outcome here, but there's no way you know for sure. He could have just as easily taken a nice long nap had he lost to Adamantium, and maybe never returned. I'd say that is as probable as what you have suggested might have happened.
From what I've seen Druff he has pulled enough BS on other staking sites to be banned. Srsly posted some links that garret has conveniently avoided. He has pulled some shit here before too, which was evident by other posts in this thread.
Obv a ban is probably more extreme than you are willing to go here, but this offense is definitely worthy of a scammatar. Given the fact that garret is pining for action with practically every post he makes, it only makes sense IMO that other people who don't pay much close attention to what goes on around here need to be warned of this shadiness.
The dude straight up lied to get the action Druff, repeatedly. You can say what you want about what you think would have been the outcome here, but there's no way you know for sure. He could have just as easily taken a nice long nap had he lost to Adamantium, and maybe never returned. I'd say that is as probable as what you have suggested might have happened.
Ahem..
Garrett cla'd him
2 week nap IMO.
It is quite coincidental that as soon as he rolled he isn't posting 24 times a day
From what I recall, he welched on a 10$ heads up bet that he lost, claiming afterwards that he thought it was best 2 out of 3. Even though no one else even remotely got that idea from the thread where the match was made. To be honest I was never involved in that thread so it would be better if betcheckbet could clarify as I may have some details wrong/missing.Maybe I am just not aware of similar incidents.
When did he ever scam or attempt to scam anyone here in the past?
Were there any other incidents where he actually bet money here with people that he either didn't have or didn't escrow?
Look, obviously the guy is living from hand to mouth and tried to play this one "on credit", figuring he would get the money to me later if he lost. That's why I didn't pay him. But the bottom line is that he did send me a legitimate looking exchange with the DFS people regarding his withdrawal, and nobody here has ever lost a single penny to anything he's done, right?
It's hard to ban him just because he said he escrowed $50 and then sent it days later. There was no chance that this trick was going to work, as I wasn't going to pay him after winning. So this was actually a negative freeroll for him.
I will keep an eye out for similar circumstances, but unless I'm missing something, this isn't a bannable situation.
With that said, he does need to cool down with the threads/posts because he has been dominating the forum lately.
As far as the second highlighted portion... You know that, and I know that, but that doesn't mean he knew that. You do remember the part where he asked you for the 50$ right? This doesn't prove he isn't a scammer, it just proves he's a dumb scammer. If he was so aware he wasn't going to get the money, why did he ask for it?
And where is the man who was posting about 100 times a day until this happened? All of a sudden MIA? Again, typical scammer behavior. You turn on the lights, and the cockroaches scatter.
"Fucking Amateur" ~ J. Sepulveda
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
