BGC rail starts here!Originally Posted by Brittney Griner's Clit
Edit:
Fucking awful high school football. Missed extra point in OT in a bowl game.
God, I hate Boston College.
BGC rail starts here!
Edit:
Fucking awful high school football. Missed extra point in OT in a bowl game.
God, I hate Boston College.
Last edited by Sanlmar; 12-27-2014 at 06:27 PM.
Close one in Milwaukee. 88-83 Atl with 24 secs left.
I have -4 on the Hawks.
Brooklyn got killed.
I can't believe I missed Philly/Utah Under 197. Just brushed by it. Would have totally bet that one. Going to win EASILY.
WOW, almost got royally screwed in that Atl game.
It's 90-83 with the final seconds ticking down, and Milwaukee keeps shooting 3s, missing, and getting the ball back. Finally they just score a two with 0.7 seconds left.
So it's 90-85 and the Hawks have it with 0.7. How can I possibly lose with -4?
Somehow the Hawks commit an offensive foul in 0.1 seconds, and it's Bucks' ball again!!!
Thankfully the Bucks chose not to even bother shooting (the Hawks weren't even defending, which was especially scary), and the game ended. Bucks player (couldn't see who it was) ran up to shoot, then just said F it and held the ball.
So now I'm 1-1.
Sac 55, NY 45 right now.
GS 25, Min 20.
Still soooooooooo mad I didn't see that Philly under because I would have taken that 100%, and this isn't just Monday morning q-backing.
48-42-3 pending the outcome of the two above games. If they both win, I'll have won an even 50 NBA bets this season.
no sweat there druff...
trent tucker rule states that there must be 0.3 seconds or more for a shot to happen...only thing that can happen in <0.3 seconds is a tip at the rim...so you were money with that time left...
I thought it was 0.4.
Anyway, the problem was that Bucks got the ball by their basket and could have easily catch-shot, or even catch-step-shot with 0.6 left.
Maybe you misunderstood my message. The 0.1 seconds was the amount that elapsed, not the amount left. There was 0.6 left.
Well Sac is up 12, though NY keeps fighting back. Battle of failteams right there.
Not sure I like my Minnesota +18 anymore. They're down by 19 in the 3rd. So it's basically going to be trash time which decides whether I win or lose this. Was hoping Minn would hang close and then I'd get it easily.
Another nailbiter.
Sac 115, NY 108 in the final 1:45
Sac is so terrible. Just shot off a 6-point lead WITH THE BALL and now it's a tie game 117-117 with 21 left. Now I need OT.
In the meantime, Min down 27.
133-126 with 0:39 in OT for Sac/NY
103-87 GS with 2 min left
SO CLOSE
OMG 9 point game and Hardaway makes a final seconds trash time 3 to make it a 6 point game, and I lose the Sac by 0.5 points.
SICK
And what's even worse is that the game went off at -6 so I could have tied.
Min down by 15. Can I at least get that one?
Well, Minnesota lost by 13, so I go 2-2 for the day.
Should have been 3-1, though honestly since Atlanta won by 1, I guess I got kinda lucky there. Though not as unlucky as I was to lose the Sac game, given how it went down.
Now 49-43-3
Well this blows.... Most books aren't posting any NFL props today.
Starting off with:
Panthers/Falcons under 48
I was going to play Lions/Packers under 48 but now it's changed to 46.5 on books I'm looking at so hoping it will go up by game time.
This was definitely an "information week". Anyone who has insiders at The NFL is shaping up to do well. NE isn't playing anyone 2H, dallas decided to play to win, NO quit, the whole Browns team went to a party at Johnny footballs house and blew off the walk through.....
Yeah that is why in Week #17 you stick to games that teams have a reason to play whether it's to get into the playoffs or moving up the seeding.
Panthers/Falcons
Lions/Packers
Bengals/Steelers
Those are the biggest key games with the Chargers vs Chiefs being a big one too.
Seattle has the #1 seed they are playing for so it's something at least.
Denver has a bye to play for but no way am I firing on them fuckers @ Denver to cover 14.5 the way Manning has played the past month. I just can't do it.
[Ticket #: 196154005] PARLAY (3 TEAMS) RR (1P-3T)
12/28/2014 @ 10:00 AM NFL [303] JACKSONVILLE +9½-110
12/28/2014 @ 10:00 AM NFL [307] INDIANAPOLIS -7-110
12/28/2014 @ 10:00 AM NFL [323] DALLAS -5½-110
Yes, I'm firing on the the lions+8 to cover spread for this reason.Yeah that is why in Week #17 you stick to games that teams have a reason to play whether it's to get into the playoffs or moving up the seeding.
Panthers/Falcons
Lions/Packers
Bengals/Steelers
Those are the biggest key games with the Chargers vs Chiefs being a big one too.
Seattle has the #1 seed they are playing for so it's something at least.
Denver has a bye to play for but no way am I firing on them fuckers @ Denver to cover 14.5 the way Manning has played the past month. I just can't do it.
Last edited by donkeykilla; 12-28-2014 at 01:54 PM. Reason: spread changed
Stafford 0-15 on the road against winning teams in his career. LOL!Yes, I'm firing on the the lions+8 to cover spread for this reason.
I don't expect them to win. I do think it will be close though.Stafford 0-15 on the road against winning teams in his career. LOL!
14-0 Packers but Aaron Rodgers calf just froze up and it didn't look good.
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 6 guests)
Reply With Quote
