celebs hacked, nudes leaked

[Daly]

So that's it? The Reddit is down?

[limitles]

I held that last hit too long.......

Anyway, you know how women spend hours in the bathroom getting made up and almost as much time
buying cosmetics or shopping for anything they think will make them look better?

I'll bet deep down a good percentage of these hackees aren't worried about these photos but actually kind of like it.

You know how we've been taught, no means yes?

As far as the politics of the shituation, wouldn't Hilary be perfect for taking up the cause and instigating a wave of
estrogen like no other time in history.

We're fucked.

BTW, I believe governments are most often one step behind rather than the opposite.

[TheXFactor]

So that's it? The Reddit is down?

Search "The Fappening" on ThePirateBay.se or other torrent sites.

Last I heard on Reddit is that some collector has a treasure trove of 4,000 celebrity pictures about 2 GB and was working on uploading it to some torrent sites soon.

[sonatine]

Word around the water cooler is that the FBI is starting to focus on insider threats, not iphone hacks, "cloud security", so on.

[ThreeBet]

DELETED FROM NET

Has a pretty comprehensive collection of these pics

[Walter Sobchak]

http://thefappening.eu/

Has a pretty comprehensive collection of these pics

Thanks! I'm always offline when the good shit happens.

WARNING: Don't try to download the pics. It's loaded with malware/trojans/evil shit.

[ThreeBet]

LOL @ Verlander cock pics now popping up. Interesting that it appears the Kate Upton photos are all from Verlander's phone, not hers. Also, who is the other chicks sending him nude photos? Ahhh boy

[adamantium]

Not that the pic was anything special but Mila Kunis is ageing like a fine wine, def on my top two list.

[sonatine]

that mila kunis picture is basically ancient, be warned. in fact a lot of these are old hat.

[simpdog]

that mila kunis picture is basically ancient, be warned. in fact a lot of these are old hat.

Based on the response from Apple this sounds dead on. Likely some people held these for a while possibly trading/trying to sell/etc....and someone let the dog out.

http://business.financialpost.com/20..._lsa=ba6c-d4a9

The celebrity accounts were “compromised by a very targeted attack on user names, passwords and security questions, a practice that is all too common on the Internet,” the Cupertino, California-based company said in a statement.

So sounds like just shitty passwords/reminders/etc.

[sonatine]

On a related note, the McKayla Maroney and Liz Lee photographs were taken when they were minors; they are child pornography, and anyone who has posted any urls or torrents containing the referenced materials in this thread or any other is quite literally guilty child pornography distribution.

[Pooh]

I think this could be a career killer for Jlaw....especially if the videos come out. She's really the only a-lister here. I haven't really heard of half those women. Too bad Vergara wasn't included.

[LLL]

I think this could be a career killer for Jlaw....especially if the videos come out. She's really the only a-lister here. I haven't really heard of half those women. Too bad Vergara wasn't included.

All it will do is impact her ability to get a big payday for on-screen nudity.

[simpdog]

On a related note, the McKayla Maroney and Liz Lee photographs were taken when they were minors; they are child pornography, and anyone who has posted any urls or torrents containing the referenced materials in this thread or any other is quite literally guilty child pornography distribution.

I would like Finklestein's opinion on this one.

Google likely had 1000's of copies of the images on their image search, Tumblr had it, imgur had them. Are they guilty too?

[Dan Druff]

"Person of Interest" had an episode related to this earlier in the year, where a scammer pretended to be a psychologist, and then would trick his patients into revealing the details of their security questions.

So if the question was, "What was your favorite childhood pet?", the guy would ask his patient to close their eyes and picture spending time with their favorite childhood pet, and then ask them to describe everything, including the pet's name. He would then take that information to get into their accounts and steal their money.

While the fake psychologist angle was a bit of a stretch, the show raised a great point that I had long thought was a huge security hole.

Most "security" questions are a joke. The questions are either incredibly easy to guess by just 10 or so tries ("What color was your first car?"), easy to look up through public database searches ("What street did you grow up on?"), or answers easily found on google ("What was the mascot of your high school?")

Even the tougher questions can be easy to guess or acquire through reading social media posts, with questions such as "What was the name of your first boyfriend or girlfriend?"

Paris Hilton's phone was hacked because she laughably chose a security question regarding the name of her CURRENT dog, which was widely known.

These "security questions" should be eliminated and replaced with something much less vulnerable. Even the best security questions can be compromised through some convincing social engineering, especially on social media.

[Dan Druff]

Also, I am guessing something similar was done regarding security question guessing, to where a really weird Canadian woman was able to "hack" and double-catfish basketball player Chris "Birdman" Andersen.

This story got surprisingly little publicity (especially the resolution), probably because it was too difficult for the general public to understand.

http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sho...l=1#post212164

Edit: After reading it again, it was probably phishing rather than password resetting through security questions, but my point still remains that it's far too easy to get into celebrity accounts online.

[sonatine]

On a related note, the McKayla Maroney and Liz Lee photographs were taken when they were minors; they are child pornography, and anyone who has posted any urls or torrents containing the referenced materials in this thread or any other is quite literally guilty child pornography distribution.

I would like Finklestein's opinion on this one.

Google likely had 1000's of copies of the images on their image search, Tumblr had it, imgur had them. Are they guilty too?

All the above have SLA's with law enforcement with regards to both the removal of illegal content and the archiving of access logs for it.

So no, they are not in violation of their SLA (yet, to my knowledge), and yes, all the people viewing those images are guilty of access child pornography and are, in the eyes of the law, sex offenders.

[sonatine]

Additionally people have been arrested/fired/lost security clearance because a *pop up* for a sketchy porn site had an underaged girl in a thumbnail.

100% true.

[Pooh]

Will anyone here admit to actually having jerked off to any of these pictures?

[sonatine]

so, the standard MO has been using a simple brute force script to compromise iphone/icloud credentials, and using a piece of software designed for law enforcement to back up the entire cloud dataset called eppb to grab the archive.