Yes, hard as it may be to believe, I didn't continue reading Dan Druff's forum after the one time I looked at it in January. I have no idea why you think I would continue lurking this forum, especially after that whole debacle on 2p2 closed down. I just barely keep up with poker news now. And no, because I mentioned Google Analytics once in a conversation does not mean I "check my Google Analytics as though my life depended on it." Stop making stuff up.
I initially had the urge to line-by-line your post. But I promised to stop this, and it seems this forum isn't too welcoming of my self-defense. The rationales are pretty unforgiving, too. "You are getting accused, so you must be guilty"--guilty by accusation? "It's suspicious that you keep having logical explanations for everything"--guilty by logicality? Either way, this forum is clearly a terrible place for me to carry on this argument.
This is such a waste of time anyway, and I don't know where you get the fire in your belly to keep going on with it. If you hate me so much, don't you just want to live your life and ignore me? Apparently not, since you're still following me around online. And then you claim not to be mad at me? I just don't get it, UHN.
It doesn't seem like you've really said much that's new in your post, you've largely just repeated the same claims, avoided some, and topped it all off with a canister of vitriol. Again, you're trying to make me seem as evil as possible without giving evidence.
As for the things you have said that are new: you're right about Como, I looked back over the conversation, which was in late 2011. You recommended that I go to Como, I said you should come too, and we flirted back and forth for a bit, but you said you were busy. I never wanted to Ashton to get hurt, period. I cared about him and still do. When I referred to the time you showed me around in London, I didn't mean before I left, I meant after I got back--when we went to the London Eye and all that. And yes, Galfond and Don did invite *both of us* to Vancouver, not just Jungle. We were all hanging out together at the time. You wouldn't have known this, of course, because you weren't there. And I never asked Jose's mom for money. And the time that I Googled you was, IIRC, a few months into our relationship. I don't think that qualifies as stalking. But, really, none of those are terribly important.
More importantly: please, stop spewing invectives at me, ascribing me spurious motives "because you can tell," and twisting my words. You said you're not mad, but you mostly just seem to be really mad at me.
I posted here for the same reason that you decided to post your reply. Because I want to defend myself. It's a simple and obvious impulse, and I don't fault you for taking up arms of your own. But you're just being brutal and nasty. I have no desire to be brutal and nasty in return, so I'm turning it off here.
Oh, and if you check your Gchat logs you'll note that yes, I did offer to corroborate my finances at the time I asked you for the loan. You declined. I also did so before and during the 2p2 episode. You declined again. If you want some corroboration now, I'm still happy to give it to you. But you'll have to reach out to me yourself (you of course know how, since you never blocked me) and be civil about it, and you'll have to promise to retract your statements and apologize if I prove everything to your satisfaction.
I don't think that's too much to ask, given how much you've already invested in your claims.
Okay, that's all. I know you guys hate me posting so I'll stop. I know I'm a compulsive self-defender. By now, I've figured out that it's pretty naive of me; some people will just always hate me and will choose to believe the worst (with 100% certainty, no less). I've brought it on myself, I know. It sucks, but sometimes things just suck.
If Dan Druff or someone can please ban this account so I don't have a choice, I'd appreciate it.
You guys can carry on with the flaming now.
HQ
Reply With Quote