Chris Moneymaker a scammer? Say it isn't so!

[Dan Druff]

You can't think of reasons why a guy in NY/NJ wouldn't want to name his real-world bookie on the Internet, who is apparently booking what seems to be high-five to six-figures week if not more?

Even if Jason is the bookie, there isn't enough evidence he was freerolling Moneymaker at any point to justify Moneymaker freerolling him. generally when people owe you $20k for 18 months your finances get a little fucked up, which I think is what Sheets is alluding to.

This statement here is the key,
"Moneymaker aka Dunlap lost over 20k NOT directly to me.................",
if moneymaker doesn't dispute that, then there is a bookie somewhere. (and even if he did call them in through JY, I still vote he owes the cash.)
And just because that book scammed someone else, that has nothing to do w/what happened between Chris and that book and JY.


Just amazing the debts people let other people run up in the poker world.
No one gets over a G in my area w/out established credit.

If the bookie doesn't exist, then Moneymaker doesn't owe anything.

You can't owe $20k to a fictitious person.

And if the bookie is fake, then Jason never fronted $20k for Chris, because you can't front money to a fake person.

You can't just go making up fake third parties for people to bet with, and then expect them to pay when they lose (and realize their betting partner was fake).

If Jason cannot prove that the bookie was real and that he actually fronted that money, then Chris doesn't owe it.

Remember, even if the bookie WAS real, there is no proof that Jason actually paid it. He claims he paid it, but if the bookie ran off and vanished, there is no one to verify that this payment really occurred.

The burden of proof is on Jason now, and he's not providing it.

He is conveniently dodging the bookie questions on 2+2, btw, making it likely that the bookie never existed.