I've seen more of this trial than I care to admit....Zimmerman is walking..period. The State simply does not have a case. The State should have been hitting home runs while calling their own witnesses, but most ended up helping the defense...I agree there is chance for civil unrest when the not guilty verdict is read...
Go watch Dateline or 20/20 or 48 Hours. Your conclusion will be juries are idiots.
Juries are really, really, really stupid. There is almost zero chance he walks. 2nd Degree murder has got to be a big favorite here. I wouldn't take 25 to 1 he walks. The DOJ was down there tainting the jury pool with their CRS division or whatever it is called.
YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK CAUSING RACIAL TENSION CROWE DIDDLEY
"Documents Obtained by Judicial Watch Detail Role of Justice Department in Organizing Trayvon Martin Protests
July 10, 2013
Document: DOJ Community Relations Service was deployed to Sanford, FL, “to provide technical assistance for the preparation of possible marches and rallies related to the fatal shooting of a 17-year-old African American male.”
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has obtained documents in response to local, state, and federal records requests revealing that a little-known unit of the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Community Relations Service (CRS), was deployed to Sanford, FL, following the Trayvon Martin shooting to help organize and manage rallies and protests against George Zimmerman.
JW filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the DOJ on April 24, 2012; 125 pages were received on May 30, 2012. JW administratively appealed the request on June 5, 2012, and received 222 pages more on March 6, 2013. According to the documents:
March 25 – 27, 2012, CRS spent $674.14 upon being “deployed to Sanford, FL, to work marches, demonstrations, and rallies related to the shooting and death of an African-American teen by a neighborhood watch captain.”
March 25 – 28, 2012, CRS spent $1,142.84 “in Sanford, FL to work marches, demonstrations, and rallies related to the shooting and death of an African-American teen by a neighborhood watch captain.
March 30 – April 1, 2012, CRS spent $892.55 in Sanford, FL “to provide support for protest deployment in Florida.”
March 30 – April 1, 2012, CRS spent an additional $751.60 in Sanford, FL “to provide technical assistance to the City of Sanford, event organizers, and law enforcement agencies for the march and rally on March 31.”
April 3 – 12, 2012, CRS spent $1,307.40 in Sanford, FL “to provide technical assistance, conciliation, and onsite mediation during demonstrations planned in Sanford.”
April 11 – 12, 2012, CRS spent $552.35 in Sanford, FL “to provide technical assistance for the preparation of possible marches and rallies related to the fatal shooting of a 17 year old African American male.”
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-r...rtin-protests/
Holder gonna Holder
Why are you aiming that at me? Is this supposed to legitimize your OP concerning random/trolling twitter death threats? Does this have anything to do with anything I've brought up, or questioned, or even mentioned in passing? I can't see how it does, really.Originally Posted by Rollo Tomasi
Your style of arguing is fucking incomprehensible, scatter-shot, and generally ignorant as fuck. And your OP is still retarded. For that last post, I have no interest in arguing about a government group that I never heard of spending dozens of hundreds of dollars on bullshit when other parts are burning huge piles of money by the billions to the detriment of almost everybody in the country, or the world if you want.
I swear that i'm starting to think that this stupid twat is trying to lay the groundwork for an appeal if he's found guilty.
me...
Is there a line on this? Curious to all those prop bettors.
My guess would be something like this:
2nd Degree murder - 5% chance of conviction
Manslaughter - 25% chance of conviction
One or more other charges but not 2nd degree murder or manslaughter - 60% chance of conviction
Joe Sebok has a Micropenis.
Acquittal - 25%
What is the line on a Rodney King-like riot? It's summer & it's fucking hot. I remember Summer of '92.
Sometimes you just need an excuse... except folks in that part of the country are lazy & slow.
So, I guess rioting is a pick 'em proposition.
It wasn't the summer of 1992. It was April 26, 1992.
Acquittal - 25%
What is the line on a Rodney King-like riot? It's summer & it's fucking hot. I remember Summer of '92.
Sometimes you just need an excuse... except folks in that part of the country are lazy & slow.
So, I guess rioting is a pick 'em proposition.
If I am betting on this I am going with a conviction on manslaughter.
IMO there is a 30% chance he is acquitted.
Unless this case is rigged there is no chance he is convicted of murder 2.
What idiots decided to try such a polarizing case in the heart of summer in fucking Florida? Now, if we get a quick jury, we could have a Friday verdict. They should have pushed this shit to dead winter. This could definitely spread the lolFlorida to other cities. I don't think anything has been this polarizing in the social media age. Going to be remembered as the Twitter Riot if it goes south.
Everyone is expecting riots over this verdict, what's the price on the under? Because I'm gonna go ahead and ride that line while it's hot
Man, I'm actually getting a bit paranoid now too, and I'm across country... time to check out the I need a gun thread.
this one is a shocker even for regular government waste standards:other parts are burning huge piles of money by the billions to the detriment of almost everybody in the country, or the world if you want.
By Michael Marlow
July 10, 2013
"Lost amid last week's cascade of major Supreme Court decisions was the news that the Court will hear a case challenging the legality of President Barack Obama's recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board. Importantly, this case will also cover Obama's appointment of the current director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Richard Cordray.
Since the organization's creation, critics have been concerned by the lack of any meaningful accountability or oversight and Cordray's appointment, without a thorough Congressional vetting, did nothing to soothe those concerns.
Though it's an organization that's supposed to represent consumers, the CFPB doesn't have to ask those consumers' elected representatives for annual funding. This shields the agency from lawmakers' most awesome means of accountability, power of the purse. Instead, the CFPB is entitled to 12 percent of the Federal Reserve's annual operating expenses, which in fiscal year 2013 totaled $597.6 million.
Any amount requested under that cap is automatically granted. Congress can't say otherwise. That leaves the CFPB ample room to spend handsomely on itself. The agency budgeted $95 million in the current fiscal year to renovate its downtown Washington headquarters. That's more than the entire annual construction and acquisition budget for the General Services Administration for all other federal buildings combined.
Unlike most other federal agencies, the CFPB is not required to abide by salary limits established by the Office of Personnel Management. That's why 58 employees have higher salaries than executive cabinet secretaries, and over 60 percent of its 1,200-employee workforce earns over $100,000 a year — before bonuses. Even lowly interns command an average $18.45 per hour.
These are the types of budgetary excesses that should receive intense Congressional scrutiny during the annual appropriations process. But even if Congress does have suspicions about reckless spending within the CFPB, the organization's founding legal charter prohibits congressional appropriators from altering its half a billion dollar budget.
All of this illustrates that the CFPB's problems are far greater than just its director. While a court decision that required Cordray to be approved by Congress would be a step in the right direction, critics would do well to keep their eye on the bigger prize: Structural reforms that increase accountability and oversight.
Michael Marlow is a professor of economics at California Polytechnic State University."
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/opi...,1955820.story
I was about to say I was down in Danville VA, a major redneck area but also alot of blacks too down there, to go to Prom with a chick I knew there and we literally had a baseball bat in the car when we were out the night before due to fears of racial shit going on even there (already had been some issues in the city itself). So it wasnt just LA that had problems due to Rodney King it apparently seemed to be an excuse by certain minorities to take a potshot at a white person for no fucking reason nationwideIt wasn't the summer of 1992. It was April 26, 1992.
How many negros are on this jury?
I know it's an all female jury.
The prosecution keeps putting out theories they think might have happened.
They don't know what exactly happened.
Zimmerman should beat the most serious charges against him but he might
get convicted on some other charges.
I couldn't agree more, this rotten bitch is doing everything within the law and her power to not let Mark O'Mara's brilliant defense make a mo-chary of the State. I mean it's so obvious she is doing it too. It's almost like she is doing everything within her power to get him convicted. In Florida, the State is ridden with this type of debauchery.
Last edited by garrett; 07-11-2013 at 06:30 AM.
He walks.
If you haven't done so already and care enough to do so youtube the John Good testimony. He eyeballs T.M. on Zimmerman in a ground and pound MMA position beating the piss out of him and confirms it was Zimmerman crying for help.
Reconcile that with the "stand your ground laws" that Florida has and he walks.
Now you can argue many other aspects of the case and he may be guilty of "asking for it' - but what can't be argued is he shot him in self defense.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
