Here's the problem.

Kessler is an honest guy and believes what he's saying.

Even Torelli, who has had his share of controversies, seems to honestly believe what he's writing.

I don't think any of these "pros" have bad intentions.

They were sold a convincing story, and figure that it can't be a scam because each person holds their own funds.

They just don't understand the flaws in the plan -- and these flaws exist on several fronts.

The biggest flaw comes from the inability to seize funds from cheaters. That's huge.

The other flaws include being illegal in the US (despite their claims otherwise), the token scheme possibly being a securities violation, the userbase being easily scammed by clever crypto phishers, the "ownership" scheme basically being a farce (and having failed before when tried in the past), and the fact that this won't appeal to the typical recreational player who will find it all too complicatged.

I don't believe this site is a scam, but it's just not likely to work out, and I'm surprised how easily people are attaching their good names to it.