I will admit those are good questions and I'm curious about the answers myself.

But I don't think Veronica needs to be a perfect accuser. Postle is the one accused of cheating and Veronica's word isn't the only reason people believe he cheated. I haven't kept up with her position over the years, but I recall her saying that she wasn't sure and went to others for confirmation when this all first started. Even if she screwed up, the stream archives seem to support the idea that Postle cheated, and he hasn't done a thing to directly refute the conclusions people have drawn from the videos.

While these things you brought up are interesting and might demonstrate some motive for Veronica to go public with the cheating accusations, it doesn't make her accusations false. And personally I'm more interested in knowing whether or not the guy cheated than knowing if Veronica is a flawed person. I don't see much of a point for Veronica to having this sit down because Postle doesn't appear to have any interest in having a good faith discussion about this or presenting actual evidence. From the few statements he has made, it seems likely he would just try to attack her personally while he provides non-responsive answers to her questions.

So, I guess we agree on the perspectives of each of the parties and that's why I doubt this would ever happen. Similar deal with his insistence about talking to Berkey without cameras or microphones or whatever. It seems like an empty offer because Berkey would obviously prefer it to be on the record for his podcast.