it's damn good, he lays out the blueprint of Marxism / socialism/ woke ideology... i would say we are about 55-65 % there ( execution of the blueprint ) it's a must watch !!
https://twitter.com/theo_tj_jordan/status/1684318428104994827
it's damn good, he lays out the blueprint of Marxism / socialism/ woke ideology... i would say we are about 55-65 % there ( execution of the blueprint ) it's a must watch !!
https://twitter.com/theo_tj_jordan/status/1684318428104994827
Originally Posted by 1dollarboxcar
RichardBrodiesCombover has aids
RichardBrodiesCombover has aids
https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1683960143283716097
Imagine agreeing with these fucking LOSERS. Sickening.
RichardBrodiesCombover has aids
Paul Rieckhoff appeared on "Deadline: White House" and said that the January 6 Capitol riot was worse than the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
RichardBrodiesCombover has aids
Hilarious
RichardBrodiesCombover has aids
Seethe mentally disordered liberals
RichardBrodiesCombover has aids
In the past few years, however, judges with paradigms tainted by politics and ideology are becoming common. Debate judge Shubham Gupta’s paradigm reads, “If you are discussing immigrants in a round and describe the person as ‘illegal,’ I will immediately stop the round, give you the loss with low speaks”—low speaker points—“give you a stern lecture, and then talk to your coach. . . . I will not have you making the debate space unsafe.”
Debate Judge Kriti Sharma concurs: under her list of “Things That Will Cause You To Automatically Lose,” number three is “Referring to immigrants as ‘illegal.’ ”
On paper, the NSDA rejects what Lavender, Gupta, and Sharma are doing. Its rules state, “Judges should decide the round as it is debated, not based on their personal beliefs.” Founded in 1925, the NSDA chooses the debate topics and facilitates hundreds of tournaments, including the annual national tournament, starting June 11 in Arizona, where six thousand students from across the country will compete. (The NSDA did not respond to emails and phone calls asking for comment before this story went to press.)
Unfortunately for students and their parents, there are countless judges at tournaments across the country whose biased paradigms disqualify them from being impartial adjudicators of debate. From “I will drop America First framing in a heartbeat,” to “I will listen to conservative-leaning arguments, but be careful,” judges are making it clear they are not only tilting the debate in a left-wing direction, they will also penalize students who don’t adhere to their ideology.
In the past year, Lindsey Shrodek has judged over 120 students at tournaments in Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey. The NSDA has certified her with its “Cultural Competency” badge, which indicates she has completed a brief online training module in evaluating students with consideration for their identity and cultural background. Until last month, Shrodek’s paradigm told debaters, “[I]f you are white, don’t run arguments with impacts that primarily affect POC [people of color]. These arguments should belong to the communities they affect.” Recently, her paradigm was updated to eliminate that quote. When I asked Shrodek why, she told me she didn’t “eliminate the idea itself,” and that she “doesn’t know if it’s exactly my place to say what arguments will or won’t make marginalized communities feel unsafe in the debate space.”
One judge gives people of color priority in her debates. In general, students voluntarily, and mutually, disclose their evidence to their opponents before the debate round, as both teams benefit from spending more time with the other team’s evidence. But X Braithwaite, who’s judged 169 debate rounds with 340 students, has her own disclosure policy in her paradigm, which uses a racial epithet: “1. N****s don’t have to disclose to you. 2. Disclose to n****s.”
CONFRONTATION at Portland State University: Did I Harm Students By Asking This Question?
RichardBrodiesCombover has aids
This has to be a rib.
I was downtown Portland tonight for a concert and wish I had grabbed pictures but there were some wild anti-fur protestors that were more fucked up and scary than any caricature of a liberal you can conjure up.
Yelling at a gentle old man for wearing leather shoes, shoving some woman who told them (presuming them) to get the fuck out of her face, etc
Sloppy doesn't scare easily but I actually braced myself as I walked through this gaggle of monstrosity for fear of AIDS, a shank etc.
PokerFraudAlert...will never censor your claims, even if they're against one of our sponsors. In addition to providing you an open forum report fraud within the poker community, we will also analyze your claims with a clear head an unbiased point of view. And, of course, the accused will always have the floor to defend themselves.-Dan Druff
TheXFactor: Drink BLEACH!!!
how pathetic. this fag is going back through my old posts trying to throw tomatoes. what a feckless internet cunt.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
