Bring back desertrunner?

[MrTickle]

If the problem was mass posting, the obvious choice seems to be to reinstate him and limit him to a point where he wouldn't feel it, UNLESS he wanted to go on a mass posting spree. Say, 50 posts per day.

[simpdog]

Let us know in advance though so we can code up a desertrunner response bot that replies to him (obv powered by chatgpt)

[simpdog]

Nevermind, chatgpt is on team desertrunner

It is not appropriate to exclude someone from a forum or any other community based on their mental disability. Doing so would be discriminatory and could potentially harm the individual in question. It is important to treat all members of a community with respect and kindness, regardless of any disabilities they may have. Inclusive communities are often more welcoming and supportive for all members, and can foster a sense of belonging and connection.

[limitles]

The poll is the hidden punchline.

You are asking the opinion of Trump voters and to a point the opinion of a "nurse" who recommended candling for your bogus ear condition.

Do as you want. Do not pretend to seek the opinion of others.

Todd is Fraud

[Dan Druff]

Next poll will be about banning limitedles

[Jayjami]

If he does come back, these will be the terms -- similar to the ones I stated in April 2021. He did not keep to these, so I banned him. However, if he's brought back, the terms will be along the same lines as back then.

1) No more than one new thread per day

2) No calling members pedos or groomers

3) No accusing people of attacking you due to them being "liberal". If you wish to answer their criticism and rebut what they say, that's fine, but no "You're just attacking me because you're a liberal" posts.

4) No bumping any old threads unless something really relevant and important has happened

5) No posting of memes

6) Don't attack every single person who criticizes you, or otherwise it becomes a situation where most of PFA becomes you fighting with all of the regulars here.


If I decide to bring him back, and he agrees to these 6 terms, then his account will be reactivated. But I haven't decided yet.

Ok. I change my vote. Zero point Zero chance he will be able to control himself. He’s just like Trump in that regard. It’ll be interesting how far he can push you before you pull the plug again.

[Cerveza Fria]

Next poll will be about banning limitedles

I would vote against banning this Gringo Hoser. Every Village needs an idiot.

[simpdog]

Next poll will be about banning limitedles

I would vote against banning this Gringo Hoser. Every Village needs an idiot.

[FRANKRIZZO]

Next poll will be about banning limitedles

Limitless vs Desert runner danceoff poll

[sonatine]

PFA boxing match.

[limitles]

Pray tell, I have upset the frauds.

Whatever will become of me?

[Jayjami]

Next poll will be about banning limitedles

How about freeing Fluffer!

[JeffDime]

I won’t judge the guy over that moment in time. It could of been just a combination of factors that caused him to have a rough time. If he had a track record of the same shit happening on other forums, than I think it would be a different story. It’s easy to be cynical and say it will be a disaster.

It does seem harmless to me to give him another try. But there will be a barrage of needles thrown his way and there’s really no way to stop that. It will be up to him to take them in stride.

I do wonder the motivation. If my experience here was that negative, I wouldn’t see much reason to return. If the motivation is to prove to himself & Druff he can take all the shit in stride imho… that’s not enough. He should really want back in because he finds enjoyment (for lack of a better word) here & not to prove anything to anyone.

[mickeycrimm]

If he does come back, these will be the terms -- similar to the ones I stated in April 2021. He did not keep to these, so I banned him. However, if he's brought back, the terms will be along the same lines as back then.

1) No more than one new thread per day

2) No calling members pedos or groomers

3) No accusing people of attacking you due to them being "liberal". If you wish to answer their criticism and rebut what they say, that's fine, but no "You're just attacking me because you're a liberal" posts.

4) No bumping any old threads unless something really relevant and important has happened

5) No posting of memes

6) Don't attack every single person who criticizes you, or otherwise it becomes a situation where most of PFA becomes you fighting with all of the regulars here.


If I decide to bring him back, and he agrees to these 6 terms, then his account will be reactivated. But I haven't decided yet.

He has to live up to these rules while his detractors have carte blanche to attack him?

[RichardBrodiesCombover.]

Why not just have friends who aren't unstable idiots?

[country978]

If he does come back, these will be the terms -- similar to the ones I stated in April 2021. He did not keep to these, so I banned him. However, if he's brought back, the terms will be along the same lines as back then.

1) No more than one new thread per day

2) No calling members pedos or groomers

3) No accusing people of attacking you due to them being "liberal". If you wish to answer their criticism and rebut what they say, that's fine, but no "You're just attacking me because you're a liberal" posts.

4) No bumping any old threads unless something really relevant and important has happened

5) No posting of memes

6) Don't attack every single person who criticizes you, or otherwise it becomes a situation where most of PFA becomes you fighting with all of the regulars here.


If I decide to bring him back, and he agrees to these 6 terms, then his account will be reactivated. But I haven't decided yet.

He has to live up to these rules while his detractors have carte blanche to attack him?

Good question Mickey. It caused me to go back and read the list again. I understand rules 1&4. The rest of the rules are double standards, no? All this build up to the time he returns. Some people in this thread who I respect a lot have said things that make it seem his return won't be a good thing. I'm keeping an open mind. Les can be downright rotten. Marley IS downright rotten, yet they're both still here. Nunbeater is a freak. I accept them all. I'm sure if this dude is your friend we can all find something to like about him.

[dwai]

bring the faggot back already also he's a pedo

[country978]

bring the faggot back already also he's a pedo

and a groomer?

[dwai]

bring the faggot back already also he's a pedo

and a groomer?

most definitely

[limitles]

You had to ban a longtime friend because the general population demanded it. What has changed? Nothing. You started this thread.