Quote Originally Posted by Jasep View Post
Quote Originally Posted by fluffer View Post
''This week on Filthy Limper, Johnny and Kevin did what they do best: they examine areas of the poker world that don’t often get the attention they deserve. This week they go old school. I have to admit that I wasn’t overly optimistic that I was going to enjoy the topic. Though I don’t consider myself a historian, I have been around the block a few times.

But I must say that I found myself totally immersed in the interview the guys did with Johnny Hughes. He had great stories about some of the old school cheats and historical gambling legends like Arnold Rothstein and Titanic Thompson. The show is three hours long but even if you can’t commit that much time I recommend checking out the Hughes interview.

I also suggest skipping the first 40 minutes of the show for reasons that would take me an entire article to explain. Maybe I’ll write an opinion piece later in the week if time permits.''



http://pokerfuse.com/features/week-i...dcasts-apr-16/
Spoke to Mike from Pokerfuse about this... He has a tremendously different opinion of online poker than Steve-O does and felt that Steve was either grossly misinformed or intentionally misleading the audience.
Really? Can someone let me know if I said something inaccurate, that wasn't an opinion? I know people disagree with some of my opinions on this topic, but that's precisely what it is; an opinion. I'm pretty sure my facts were solid. More so, it's an opinion on something nobody really knows the truth to. I'd feel sorry for this person if he made a statement like that without having a legitimate reason for wanting to silence differing opinions than his own.