Blatant Gambling Scammer Christopher Mitchell (YouTube/Baccarat/Roulette/Sportsbetting)

[PositiveVariance]

Games like Baccarat and Roulette are unique to an online casino because they only need 1 table. Other games such as Blackjack are limited to the number of spots that are on a table, such as 7. Games like Roulette and Baccarat, everyone is playing off the same Spin or cards. So as long as an online casino is ok with taking the variance, 1 table can work. An unlimited number of bets can be placed per spin.

So if an online casino was going to cheat, which it’s my guess it’s a very slim chance BOL would, it would benefit them if they were to use the bouncy ball (lol), when the ball landed in the colored slot that has the most action on it, in hopes it would land in the lower action slot. There would be no guarantees that it won’t land in another black slot, but you have a free chance at it. Like in the video, it “jumped” from a black slot to another black slot.



Most online casinos, if they wanted to “Cheat You”, they would just keep your money. Being in a foreign country, what will you do about it? The sad part is the only thing that keeps these online casinos from not stealing your money is their reputation. They know, they live and die by their reputation regarding withdrawals. Once an online casino starts to go under, that’s when they are more likely to take a customers money.

So if your a player:
I’m not sure on BOL’s set up if you can see the number of bets on each colored slot, but I know some online casinos you can see this. So if you are concerned you are being cheated by a bouncy remote control ball or another method where they try to get the ball to land on the color where the least amount of dollars would be paid out. If you suspect this, then you can place your bet on the color with the least amount of action.

[zealanddonk]

Games like Baccarat and Roulette are unique to an online casino because they only need 1 table. Other games such as Blackjack are limited to the number of spots that are on a table, such as 7. Games like Roulette and Baccarat, everyone is playing off the same Spin or cards. So as long as an online casino is ok with taking the variance, 1 table can work. An unlimited number of bets can be placed per spin.

So if an online casino was going to cheat, which it’s my guess it’s a very slim chance BOL would, it would benefit them if they were to use the bouncy ball (lol), when the ball landed in the colored slot that has the most action on it, in hopes it would land in the lower action slot. There would be no guarantees that it won’t land in another black slot, but you have a free chance at it. Like in the video, it “jumped” from a black slot to another black slot.



Most online casinos, if they wanted to “Cheat You”, they would just keep your money. Being in a foreign country, what will you do about it? The sad part is the only thing that keeps these online casinos from not stealing your money is their reputation. They know, they live and die by their reputation regarding withdrawals. Once an online casino starts to go under, that’s when they are more likely to take a customers money.

So if your a player:
I’m not sure on BOL’s set up if you can see the number of bets on each colored slot, but I know some online casinos you can see this. So if you are concerned you are being cheated by a bouncy remote control ball or another method where they try to get the ball to land on the color where the least amount of dollars would be paid out. If you suspect this, then you can place your bet on the color with the least amount of action.

In one of the "lost episodes" Chrissy did mention never play roulette at a live casino alone, because they'll fuck you.
This despite all of his "big wins".

Cheating is much more likel to be just not getting paid out, or banning someone who is too successful, both of which have not happened to Chrissy.

[Dan Druff]

Believe it or not, I agree with 2020 Chrissy regarding the "online casinos cheat you" thing. They definitely can, and some definitely do.

To answer the question of, "Why would they cheat you when they could just no-pay you?", it's because no-paying kills their reputation, whereas cheating players does not (as long as they don't get caught).

Are there no-pay online casinos? Tons. Most of the small ones eventually go under and don't pay. Some of them are outright scams from the beginning.

But would I believe that some of the medium sized and bigger online casinos are rigging their games? Fuck yeah.

Of course, it's easy to change your opinion about online casinos when you get banned from enough live ones -- and when you find an online casino which pays you 35% of the losses of suckers you refer there.

[J T]

Larger online casinos usually outsource to third parties for their live games and slots. Evolution, Playtech, ect. They've been caught doing shady shit occasionally but I'd trust a third party over a house casino.

[TheRivers]

Larger online casinos usually outsource to third parties for their live games and slots. Evolution, Playtech, ect. They've been caught doing shady shit occasionally but I'd trust a third party over a house casino.

I’ve often wondered if even the large casino companies like Caesars and MGN run their online casinos completely cheat-free. In New Jersey they don’t outsource them and you can actually look in and see the operation when visiting places like Caesar’s and Golden Nugget in Atlantic City. I don’t play online very often. But when I have those are the ones I use. I’ve not noticed anything shady.

[TheRivers]

Yeah…I don’t think any explanation is needed for this. You can figure out what it is and where it came from.

[Dan Druff]

Larger online casinos usually outsource to third parties for their live games and slots. Evolution, Playtech, ect. They've been caught doing shady shit occasionally but I'd trust a third party over a house casino.

I would, too, but I wouldn't trust any of them, unless licensed/regulated by a first world country.

[FRANKRIZZO]

Where is betonline located? This guy is such a train wreck have to look in thread. Like a car accident you just have to.

[J T]

Larger online casinos usually outsource to third parties for their live games and slots. Evolution, Playtech, ect. They've been caught doing shady shit occasionally but I'd trust a third party over a house casino.

I would, too, but I wouldn't trust any of them, unless licensed/regulated by a first world country.

Evolution is not some mickey mouse company.

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/EVO.ST

[donkey]

I would, too, but I wouldn't trust any of them, unless licensed/regulated by a first world country.

Evolution is not some mickey mouse company.

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/EVO.ST

https://www.reuters.com/technology/s...on-2021-11-17/

[J T]

Evolution is not some mickey mouse company.

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/EVO.ST

https://www.reuters.com/technology/s...on-2021-11-17/

Everyone knows this, most gambling stocks are down bad, and if you're not cashing in on the crypto gambling online you're a fool.

I wish I owned 1% of stake.com

[Dan Druff]

I would, too, but I wouldn't trust any of them, unless licensed/regulated by a first world country.

Evolution is not some mickey mouse company.

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/EVO.ST

I don't play online casino games, so I haven't looked into this all too closely. However, unless there are regulations with teeth upon companies providing online casino gaming, and they're providing partially for unregulated markets, I still would have plenty of reservations.

I had the same discussion with people in the 2000s regarding huge online poker sites like UB and Full Tilt. "They're huge and basically printing money. Why would they ever cheat anyone? We don't need bureaucratic regulation. I trust them fully."

Oops.

You've got to be really, really careful before you play against the house online, even if the game is being farmed out to a third party. (I do agree that mostly-trusted third party companies are far more likely to be honest than directly provided games, though.)

[J T]

Evolution is not some mickey mouse company.

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/EVO.ST

I don't play online casino games, so I haven't looked into this all too closely. However, unless there are regulations with teeth upon companies providing online casino gaming, and they're providing partially for unregulated markets, I still would have plenty of reservations.

I had the same discussion with people in the 2000s regarding huge online poker sites like UB and Full Tilt. "They're huge and basically printing money. Why would they ever cheat anyone? We don't need bureaucratic regulation. I trust them fully."

Oops.

You've got to be really, really careful before you play against the house online, even if the game is being farmed out to a third party. (I do agree that mostly-trusted third party companies are far more likely to be honest than directly provided games, though.)

Pinnacle never screwed me out of a dollar but bookmakers licensed and regulated in multiple first world countries certainly have, usually with the support of the regulatory body.

[PositiveVariance]

J T,

What would make you think that half of us are dead broke?

And for the record very few of us in this thread, are from that other poker site (NWP)
Just look at our forum join dates. That site was 10 years ago?


Also, you see how you were talking about Macau in the comments in KD’s video, then he brings up this thread out of no where? He is obsessed.

[J T]

The majority of NWP was broke, there were some real ballers though.

[PositiveVariance]

I believe there are only 2 posters that post in this thread regularly besides Druff that posted on that other site (NWP). (Forum Wars, Zealanddonk) based on their sign up dates. Most of the posters on this thread signed up here after the thread was started - Including your boy KD.

[Dan Druff]

The majority of NWP was broke, there were some real ballers though.

We're getting off topic, but durrrrr (Tom Dwan) got his start on NWP.

[Dan Druff]

Well... I shall remain true to my word.

KD is libeling me in his comments section again. Therefore, he has lost access to read this thread.

Please respect this decision of mine, and do not provide him any content from this thread. I simply wish to end this guy's stalking of this site and the content theft he has recently engaged in, and this is the only way to do it. While I trust that almost all of you will respect my wishes, I do want to note that I will remove anyone from accessing this forum who is found sharing the thread contents with this individual. This includes lurkers.

If he wishes to discuss this with me and have this decision reversed, he knows how to get a hold of me.

[zealanddonk]

Well, this is interesting.
Chrissy just posted a quick 16 minute video.
He did a dog and pony show where he showed screenshots of withdrawing $5000 from his BOL account.
Natch he doesnt do a live withdrawal, and he doesnt do a live show of recent transaction.

Anyways, he is doing a real song and dance about lowering the Inner circle cost to $99.
He claims he and his wife "brainstormed" how he could drop the price.
Yeah its easy, drop the price to $99.
But apparently it took Einstein a lot of brainpower to come up with this.

But wait, theres less!
Its now $99 a month.
He's finally figured out how to use Patreon without using Patreon (by doubling the price).

So to clarify:
January $1000
Mid February $500
Late February $250
Final days in the bunker in late Feb $99 (per/month)

He'll also throw in some crypto tips as well.
Before you sign up, remember he refers to his desktop wallpaper as a screensaver.

So, given how well Patreon went for him, this is likely to be another fail.

And yes, I was on NWP, there were some good times there, Bring Back NeverHeeb for a heeb run!

[TheRivers]

Annnd…the inner circle has now gone recurring. $99 per month to join. Not sure how our primitive scammer is going to keep up with those recurring payments…especially if he honors the lifetime payment that a lot of folks have already made. This is what he tried to do when he briefly sold sports picks. He quickly abandoned that when he realized he had no infrastructure to maintain it.

The video he just posted (at around 11:45 Eastern time) seems like it was shot at night…which tells me he is still in the US. No mention of Macau on the video.