It funny. To me, this showed how academic journals are nonsense far more than some weird political thing.
It wasn't actual professors that accepted these. Nor was it really "academia" that reviewed the papers. They call the journals "prestigious", but don't actually mention them by name. LOL.
List the journals at least.
I mean, they would need to submit shit papers in other fields etc to have some of comparison, to draw any conclusion similar to the one drawn. How do we know that similar things wouldn't be approved at similar rates when not weirdo identity jargon?
Do you see that your conclusions are nonsensical?






Reply With Quote