Quote Originally Posted by vegas1369 View Post
Quote Originally Posted by peter mcneil View Post
The entire grammar expert thing is a joke, I'm assuming Searles is sending that single post and asking them what it means? Nobody would dispute the answer of that, Vegas has clearly outlined what the bet was, the intention of the bet is crystal clear to everyone reading the thread, 100% Searles loses this bet if the entire thread is sent to any impartial judge, not sure why he would even bother wasting anyones time. It's a lousy $500 man, give $200 to druff for the radio show free roll like Vegas said and ship him the $300.


This outside arbitration bullshit is just another angle shooting stall tactic. The lengths this guy will go not to pay me would make Bernie Madoff proud.
The bet included a clause for three impartial arbitrators. I am merely exercising my rights per the bet. The bet did not include escrow, but I'm still willing to do that, assuming the bet clause pertaining to three impartial judges is met. I'm abiding by the terms of the bet, Vegas is not. The ONLY reason he is not is because he fears losing.