Quote Originally Posted by 1dollarboxcar View Post
let's compare this case with the Johnny Depp case... and i think we should, very comparable cases... why was Depp allowed to bring evidence to show what a whack job Amber Heard was?? well because that is part of the process and a normal and legal defense tactic to discredit an accuser and weed out possible false allegations. Trump was never afforded any of this and was basically told to shut up and take it on the chin... i am pretty sure without looking that the Depp and Trump case were in 2 different court districts but the laws should be not that far off as to what a defense can bring as evidence or try to discredit what the plaintiff brings as evidence. it's a total 180 of what Depp and his defense was able to do compared to Trump's case....

and we all know now what kind of ties the Trump judge had with the plaintiff and who financed the plaintiff's case (Caroll) .... total hit job from start to finish... any lawyers that come here and try to defend what just happened to Trump should be disbarred right in line with this judge and the prosecutor attorneys who represented Caroll... end of story... GET OVER YOUR TDS !!!...
Going to be one of the more hilarious moments when he is President and this gets tossed on appeal. You think TDS is bad now, just wait until that meltdown happens. Winning $85M on being called a whack job. This just makes Trump stronger, only the far left loons think this is a just verdict.