I got big Dick's back on this, literally and figuratively..
He doesn't lie..
He told me he squeals like a pig , and dam, does he squeal..
I got big Dick's back on this, literally and figuratively..
He doesn't lie..
He told me he squeals like a pig , and dam, does he squeal..
It is not you pathological fucking liar. You even admitted that in the thread you started to present the proof that you were not lying.Originally Posted by big dick
This is what happened you fucking retard
You followed me around for 6+ months under the premise that I was talking shit about your cubbies when they were down 3-1 in the WS & when I finally found out what your problem with me was, I told you that wasn't true & you proceeded to follow me around for another month+ instead of going to check if what I was saying was true.
You ended up starting a thread to clear your name that spectacularly backfired as it showed what I was saying to be true & everything you said was incorrect & you even admitted that. I could have probably just let it go at that but instead of just admitting that is was mistaken identity(which you did) & you were wrong for doing that(which you never did) you decided to double down on the lies by saying you did it for the lol's & it was because I was an easy target blah, blah, blah, which is an obvious fucking lie & is what liars do.
In conclusion: your username should be changed to "big pussy" & your undertitle to "big fat liar".
(•_•) ..
∫\ \___( •_•)
_∫∫ _∫∫ɯ \ \
lol dude you take this shit way to seriously . Clear my name? wtf are you talking about? I honestly don't even remember the full details of why I hate you I just remember you talking shit in the cubs world series thread so I decided to troll you a bit.
Folds to guy in mid position makes it 3k with 600/1200 blinds. One caller and I push with 24k with AK off. Initial raiser folds and woma calls with 3s. Flop A 10 Q A J. Im at 47k now
No, you're just a fucking liar. Your story has changed 3 times now. It's what fucking liars need do I guess.
(•_•) ..
∫\ \___( •_•)
_∫∫ _∫∫ɯ \ \
Blinds still 800/1600 Ante 200. Guy limps UTG +1, I make it 4200 with AJ off. Button Goes all in for 18700, limper folds and I call. Button shows KQ. Flop is K 10 4 8 10.
Down to 25500ish.
I dont understand the bump to 4500, but hey that must be why I dont get these juicy porterhouse stakes.
This is the only hand he's posted which isn't a complete disaster. I'm assuming the SB is the maniac here (he's not clear, but that's what it seems.)
When the maniac fires out on a board like Q24 and you have KQ, you need to kick it up, as the maniac will pay you off with less. The BB just calling on the flop means he's probably behind, and you want to charge him for it.
When the BB flats the 7k on the turn, then you have to consider whether he's calling that much off with worse than your QK (though I don't know the BB's stack size here, which is important), and it's actually a tough decision on what to do. Much of this is player dependent -- whether you think the BB is the type who would still flat this much with a better hand, and how much of a chance he's flatting with a worse hand or a draw. Much of this is also stack size dependent.
In this case, OSA made the right fold, as the BB was flatting with a set, and the SB (maniac?) had shit.
id rather let the maniac bluff
You're probably even lying about that.
(•_•) ..
∫\ \___( •_•)
_∫∫ _∫∫ɯ \ \
I understand, but especially in a tournament setting, since I only have top pair, I'd much rather get the other guy out and let the maniac stack off against me (which he would have and lost versus OSA, had the BB not been in the hand).
Don't get me wrong, though. Most of OSA's hands posted in this thread have been lolbad, but this wasn't one of them.
Slava Ukraini!
More importantly, what's your take on big dick being a big fucking liar?I understand, but especially in a tournament setting, since I only have top pair, I'd much rather get the other guy out and let the maniac stack off against me (which he would have and lost versus OSA, had the BB not been in the hand).
Don't get me wrong, though. Most of OSA's hands posted in this thread have been lolbad, but this wasn't one of them.
Inquiring minds need to know.
(•_•) ..
∫\ \___( •_•)
_∫∫ _∫∫ɯ \ \
Blinds are going to be 1/2k next hand, and im on life support 22100.
If it folds to you in middle position or later, and you have an average+ hand, start shoving. Don't let yourself get blinded down.
If one needs advice like this, you should probably not be playing poker.If it folds to you in middle position or later, and you have an average+ hand, start shoving. Don't let yourself get blinded down.
Slava Ukraini!
This is the only hand he's posted which isn't a complete disaster. I'm assuming the SB is the maniac here (he's not clear, but that's what it seems.)
When the maniac fires out on a board like Q24 and you have KQ, you need to kick it up, as the maniac will pay you off with less. The BB just calling on the flop means he's probably behind, and you want to charge him for it.
When the BB flats the 7k on the turn, then you have to consider whether he's calling that much off with worse than your QK (though I don't know the BB's stack size here, which is important), and it's actually a tough decision on what to do. Much of this is player dependent -- whether you think the BB is the type who would still flat this much with a better hand, and how much of a chance he's flatting with a worse hand or a draw. Much of this is also stack size dependent.
In this case, OSA made the right fold, as the BB was flatting with a set, and the SB (maniac?) had shit.
You're missing the exact reason *not* to bump it up:
the BB flatting the flop bet from SB.
If he was HU with maniac, cool. But exactly what hand do you think the BB is flatting with? The instinct to throw more chips into that situation is why tournaments are profitable for people who dont throw more chips into that situation.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
Dont know if it is correct, but was thinking the same
This is the only hand he's posted which isn't a complete disaster. I'm assuming the SB is the maniac here (he's not clear, but that's what it seems.)
When the maniac fires out on a board like Q24 and you have KQ, you need to kick it up, as the maniac will pay you off with less. The BB just calling on the flop means he's probably behind, and you want to charge him for it.
When the BB flats the 7k on the turn, then you have to consider whether he's calling that much off with worse than your QK (though I don't know the BB's stack size here, which is important), and it's actually a tough decision on what to do. Much of this is player dependent -- whether you think the BB is the type who would still flat this much with a better hand, and how much of a chance he's flatting with a worse hand or a draw. Much of this is also stack size dependent.
In this case, OSA made the right fold, as the BB was flatting with a set, and the SB (maniac?) had shit.
You're missing the exact reason *not* to bump it up:
the BB flatting the flop bet from SB.
If he was HU with maniac, cool. But exactly what hand do you think the BB is flatting with? The instinct to throw more chips into that situation is why tournaments are profitable for people who dont throw more chips into that situation.
Slava Ukraini!
Q10, Q9, any pocket pair?
This is the only hand he's posted which isn't a complete disaster. I'm assuming the SB is the maniac here (he's not clear, but that's what it seems.)
When the maniac fires out on a board like Q24 and you have KQ, you need to kick it up, as the maniac will pay you off with less. The BB just calling on the flop means he's probably behind, and you want to charge him for it.
When the BB flats the 7k on the turn, then you have to consider whether he's calling that much off with worse than your QK (though I don't know the BB's stack size here, which is important), and it's actually a tough decision on what to do. Much of this is player dependent -- whether you think the BB is the type who would still flat this much with a better hand, and how much of a chance he's flatting with a worse hand or a draw. Much of this is also stack size dependent.
In this case, OSA made the right fold, as the BB was flatting with a set, and the SB (maniac?) had shit.
You're missing the exact reason *not* to bump it up:
the BB flatting the flop bet from SB.
If he was HU with maniac, cool. But exactly what hand do you think the BB is flatting with? The instinct to throw more chips into that situation is why tournaments are profitable for people who dont throw more chips into that situation.
What is the BB flatting with on the flop for a mere 1500?
This is the only hand he's posted which isn't a complete disaster. I'm assuming the SB is the maniac here (he's not clear, but that's what it seems.)
When the maniac fires out on a board like Q24 and you have KQ, you need to kick it up, as the maniac will pay you off with less. The BB just calling on the flop means he's probably behind, and you want to charge him for it.
When the BB flats the 7k on the turn, then you have to consider whether he's calling that much off with worse than your QK (though I don't know the BB's stack size here, which is important), and it's actually a tough decision on what to do. Much of this is player dependent -- whether you think the BB is the type who would still flat this much with a better hand, and how much of a chance he's flatting with a worse hand or a draw. Much of this is also stack size dependent.
In this case, OSA made the right fold, as the BB was flatting with a set, and the SB (maniac?) had shit.
You're missing the exact reason *not* to bump it up:
the BB flatting the flop bet from SB.
If he was HU with maniac, cool. But exactly what hand do you think the BB is flatting with? The instinct to throw more chips into that situation is why tournaments are profitable for people who dont throw more chips into that situation.
Could be anything, including a pair, open-ended draw, gutshot-draw....
If you play scared poker because the BB flats a small bet on the flop when you hold top pair/good kicker against a maniac leading out, then you are either going to get run over or you're going to whine after the BB spikes his weird gutshot or 2-pair on the turn.
The presence of the maniac (and his leading out) is what changes the hand entirely from the standard.
The good thing about OSA's raise is that it showed the BB had a strong enough hand to call, so it probably rules out a gutshot draw or worse than top pair. So when the maniac shoved the turn and the BB called, it was an easier (but not totally obvious) fold.
My thought in this spot (on the flop) is, "At the moment I probably have the best hand, and I want the BB out so the maniac can stack off against me. If either has a monster, then so be it."
For just 3k more, OSA got valuable information which allowed him to make a correct fold.
One limper, andI go all in for 17000 with pocket 3s. Guy who just rebought and sat at the table went all in for like 30k and turns over 4s. So fucking standard.
Board runs out and I dont get help.
Out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
