Self Defense = Shot in face, stabbed 27 times and slashed form ear to ear... (Jodi Arias murder trial)

[LLL]

I won't lie, I want to bang Jodi Arias even after hearing how fucking nuts she is. I wouldn't get in the shower afterwards, but I'd otherwise take my chances. I have her clearly ahead of Casey Anthony on my list of killers I would bang. Plus, I couldn't get past the baby killing with Casey. Banging a guy and then killing him I could probably deal with.

On a side note, I was sweating this trial today and heard that she had a 4 year relationship with a guy she lived with. He is going to testify for the defense.

Dude's profile. He's 52. Good score for him considering she was likely about 25 at the time they started dating. Crazy girls really do it for me.

He testified yesterday...

Brewer, 52, dated Arias for four years and shared a home with her in California for two years. He told the court today that Arias called him in May 2008, asking to borrow gas cans, but would not explain why. She called him again at least two more times, and arrived at his house on June 2008, to borrow the cans.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/jodi-arias-...ry?id=18345450

[LLL]

Finally found the uncensored nude pics that she took before killing Travis. That pussy looks weird.

 

http://dazereader.com/2013/01/jodi-a...os-uncensored/

[LLL]

This jury is gonna shit the bed.

Accused murderer Jodi Arias was kept away from the Mormon friends of her lover Travis Alexander and their torrid sex affair was kept secret by Alexander, even as he sent lewd photos of himself to her online, according to court testimony today.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/jodi-arias-...ry?id=18368010

[Dan Druff]

There is no indication that there was any sort of abuse in that relationship. This chick seems like a cold-hearted psycho, and it's 100% she killed him out of rage and tried to cover it up.

There was a LOL interview of hers in September, 2008 where she insisted she wasn't anywhere near Mesa, AZ where the murders occurred, despite the investigator having proof:

I really hope the jury here isn't dumb enough to buy any of this crap, and gives her the death penalty.

[LLL]

There is no indication that there was any sort of abuse in that relationship. This chick seems like a cold-hearted psycho, and it's 100% she killed him out of rage and tried to cover it up.

Here is a LOL interview of hers in September, 2008 where she insisted she wasn't anywhere near Mesa, AZ where the murders occurred, despite the investigator having proof:



I really hope the jury here isn't dumb enough to buy any of this crap, and gives her the death penalty.

Based on what I have seen so far I would lay odds that she won't get sentenced to death. How could you not be worried after this:

Uh oh...

Jurors in the Jodi Arias murder trial asked questions today suggesting they had doubts about the investigation into the murder of her ex-boyfriend Travis Alexander.

Arizona is one of only three states that allow jury members to pose questions to witnesses after prosecutors and attorneys have finished their questioning.

Today, on the eighth day of Arias' trial in Maricopa County, the jury had several questions for the lead detective in the murder investigation.

The jury submitted multiple handwritten questions to Judge Sherry Stephens after the testimony of Detective Esteban Flores of the Mesa, Ariz., police department:

"When interviewing Mr. Alexander's roommates, did they ever show concern for his extended absence?"

"Did you ever check into their alibis?"

"Did Mr. Alexander have another boarder living in the house (and) were fingerprints of the boarder taken to see if they matched the scene?"

The questions suggested that the jury has not completely bought the prosecutions' argument that Arias, a jealous ex-girlfriend, drove to Alexander's house in 2008 and had sex with him before stabbing him 27 times and shooting him. His body was found five days later.

Arias faces the death penalty if convicted.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/jodi-arias-...ry?id=18229073

[Dan Druff]

Boy, these juries are full of complete morons.

So frustrating to read things like these.

Did you ever see the film "Runaway Jury"?

It was a hit piece against the gun industry, and it had some stupid twists, but I did enjoy the accurate depiction of how gullible and easily-swayed juries typically are.

[LLL]

Boy, these juries are full of complete morons.

So frustrating to read things like these.

Did you ever see the film "Runaway Jury"?

It was a hit piece against the gun industry, and it had some stupid twists, but I did enjoy the accurate depiction of how gullible and easily-swayed juries typically are.

Yes. Man, I miss seeing Gene Hackman in the movies.

[LLL]

As expected Arias took the stand yesterday.

Jodi Arias took the stand today and quickly told the jury that she killed her ex-boyfriend Travis Alexander in a bloody attack in 2008.

And in a surprise, Arias told the jury that she planned to also kill herself.

"Did you kill Travis Alexander?" defense attorney Kirk Nurmi asked Arias immediately after she took the stand.

"Yes," Arias said softly, turning to look at the jury.

"Why?"

"The simple answer is that he attacked me and I defended myself," she said.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/jodi-arias-...ry?id=18399979

[LLL]

It's been uploaded to Youtube... Cross examination should be HOF.

[LLL]

Yesterday's testimony...

[DJ_Chaps]

They better not use that pussycat prosecutor for cross examination. This bitch needs to be broken down.

[Dan Druff]

This is not looking good. Observers believe that the jury is "buying" the bullshit testimony from Arias and her friends that Travis Alexander was abusive and a "sexual deviant".

The "sexual deviant" part includes a recorded call where Alexander told Arias that she "sounds like a 12-year-old girl having an orgasm for the first time".

That is supposed to be justification of the "sexual abuse" that caused Arias to kill Alexander in "self defense".

Say what?!

I really, really, really hate the "sexual deviance" defense. Basically, any guy who is into sex that is even SLIGHTLY deviating from plain-vanilla is considered to be an abuser who deserves to be killed by his wife/girlfriend.

There was this terrible, terrible injustice in 2006:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Winkler

In this case, Mary Winkler was an idiotic hick who gave $17,000 to a Nigerian scammer. When her husband found out about it and (rightfully) gave her a hard time about it, she got out a shotgun and shot him -- IN THE BACK! Somehow this was still labeled as "self defense" and she got less than a year in prison!

One of Winkler's defenses was that he "made" her wear "slutty" outfits, and showed everyone a wig and high-heeled boots to prove what a freak he was. So apparently if you want your wife to wear high-heeled boots and a wig, you are some sort of freak who is abusing her and she can kill you.

This case looks like yet another one where they vilify basically a decent man, and the psycho female killer will get off with a slap on the wrist.

Why aren't femininst groups protesting cases like this and the Winkler one, so as to preserve the "battered wife defense" for women who are actually battered?

I'll tell you why -- because feminist groups are extremely hypocritical and afraid to speak out against any injustice unless the victim is female.

[Deal]

This is not looking good. Observers believe that the jury is "buying" the bullshit testimony from Arias and her friends that Travis Alexander was abusive and a "sexual deviant".

The "sexual deviant" part includes a recorded call where Alexander told Arias that she "sounds like a 12-year-old girl having an orgasm for the first time".

That is supposed to be justification of the "sexual abuse" that caused Arias to kill Alexander in "self defense".

Say what?!

I really, really, really hate the "sexual deviance" defense. Basically, any guy who is into sex that is even SLIGHTLY deviating from plain-vanilla is considered to be an abuser who deserves to be killed by his wife/girlfriend.

There was this terrible, terrible injustice in 2006:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Winkler

In this case, Mary Winkler was an idiotic hick who gave $17,000 to a Nigerian scammer. When her husband found out about it and (rightfully) gave her a hard time about it, she got out a shotgun and shot him -- IN THE BACK! Somehow this was still labeled as "self defense" and she got less than a year in prison!

One of Winkler's defenses was that he "made" her wear "slutty" outfits, and showed everyone a wig and high-heeled boots to prove what a freak he was. So apparently if you want your wife to wear high-heeled boots and a wig, you are some sort of freak who is abusing her and she can kill you.

This case looks like yet another one where they vilify basically a decent man, and the psycho female killer will get off with a slap on the wrist.

Why aren't femininst groups protesting cases like this and the Winkler one, so as to preserve the "battered wife defense" for women who are actually battered?

I'll tell you why -- because feminist groups are extremely hypocritical and afraid to speak out against any injustice unless the victim is female.

David Sklansky should be following with interest.

[LLL]

I bet the prosecutor can't wait to cross examine this bitch...

Accused murderer Jodi Arias testified today that her ex-boyfriend, Travis Alexander, had a "Bill Clinton view of sex" because Alexander was eager for oral and anal sex to get around Mormon church rules against premarital sex.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/jodi-arias-...ry?id=18420949

[LLL]

[big dick]

I recall when this aired on 48 Hours also, and it was just one of those cases where you knew what happened as soon as you saw the picture. Girl was crazy and really hot(not so much as a blonde) and the kid was a fucking Mormon and playing with fire. She's one of those girls you can't give up because crazy girls are just so dirty, but you can't turn your back on those types. Usually they'll just try and roll you financially or say you raped her or molested their kid or something insane when you break it off, but this girl obviously stepped up her game.

lol couldn't have said it better myself.....

[big dick]

Finally found the uncensored nude pics that she took before killing Travis. That pussy looks weird.

 

http://dazereader.com/2013/01/jodi-a...os-uncensored/

she looks about 1000xs better with clothes on. and yuk what an ugly pussy and her tits suck too.

[LLL]

While we wait for Jodi to continue her testimony let's hear from a male supporter...

Despite currently facing the possibility of being sentenced to death if found guilty of the gruesome murder of her last boyfriend, Jodi Arias already has a new male admirer — and he is strongly defending the moral fibre of the woman accused of viciously butchering devout Mormon, Travis Alexander .

Bryan Carr has been front and center every day throughout Arias’ sensational and controversial trial at the Maricopa County Courtroom in Phoenix, Arizona, sitting silently and listening to the shocking tales of sex, violence and betrayal, while the object of his affection literally fights for her life, as well as her liberty...

Having stayed silent about their blossoming relationship for all these months, Carr is finally opening up — speaking to local station, Channel 12 News about the woman who has been his close confidante for the past year — and insisting she is far from the manipulative, sex-crazed, jealousy–fueled, cold blooded killer many believe her to be.

“She is not that person at all. She is the nicest person you will ever meet,” he said, AZCentral.com is reporting.
http://radaronline.com/exclusives/20...ryan-carr-sex/
http://www.azcentral.com/video/2147548069001

[LLL]

And her testimony continues:

12:44 p.m. ET: Defense attorney Kirk Nurmi is asking Arias about the Valentine's Day gift Arias received from Alexander in 2007. Arias says it was a package of three pieces of boys' underwear with different Spider-Man prints on them.

12:49 p.m. ET: Arias said the underwear confused her, but she gave him the benefit of the doubt. She thought it was some kind of "trend." Alexander told her that he wanted her to wear the Spider-Man underwear.

12:51 p.m. ET: The Spider-Man underwear did not fit Arias' body. She had to make alterations to them be able to put them on. Arias said Alexander told her it was hot when she put them on.
http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/02...ay-4?hpt=hp_t4

[Dan Druff]

And her testimony continues:

12:44 p.m. ET: Defense attorney Kirk Nurmi is asking Arias about the Valentine's Day gift Arias received from Alexander in 2007. Arias says it was a package of three pieces of boys' underwear with different Spider-Man prints on them.

12:49 p.m. ET: Arias said the underwear confused her, but she gave him the benefit of the doubt. She thought it was some kind of "trend." Alexander told her that he wanted her to wear the Spider-Man underwear.

12:51 p.m. ET: The Spider-Man underwear did not fit Arias' body. She had to make alterations to them be able to put them on. Arias said Alexander told her it was hot when she put them on.
http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/02...ay-4?hpt=hp_t4

WHY IS THIS SHIT PART OF THE TESTIMONY?

This should be considered irrelevant to the case and never part of a defense.

Unless the victim was committing illegal sexual acts (bestiality, child molestation, unwanted spousal rape, etc), it should not matter at ALL what the victim found "hot", even if some of it was weird.

You would be hard pressed to find any adult male that doesn't have some sexual desire that is slightly out of the mainstream.

If you don't like your husband or boyfriend's sexual fetishes, there is an easy solution -- leave him. These are not ever justification for any sort of violence.

I can actually have sympathy for the battered woman who snaps and shoots her husband after years of physical abuse, even if not in direct self defense. I'm not saying that should be excused, but I can understand it. I can see it being used as a mitigating factor to consider during sentencing and to downgrade a first-degree murder charge. However, sexual desires should NOT be admissible in situations like this. It will also open up a huge can of worms to where basically any woman can fish out something "perverted" her husband said/did, and then use it as an excuse for killing him, claiming "sexual abuse".

Terrible.