Unbelievable. I used to have respect for TIME (though this was many, many years ago), but this shit just borders on child porn (even if that's not the way the mother sees it.)
I don't mind them doing a story on 3-year-olds still breast feeding, but to put a posed picture of it on the cover?! And do you think they would have put this on the cover if the mom was 43 and saggy, rather than 26 and hot?
Three year olds are very aware of things, and it's just not appropriate for them to still be breastfeeding, especially given that there aren't really health benefits from doing so at that point.
Pretty pathetic that TIME is resorting to shock pictures (which at the same time will excite pedos) in order to sell magazines.
Reply With Quote