Nevada -2.5
Nevada -2.5
Originally Posted by DrPeters
Well look at the bright side at least you didn’t do a fast cash
lol, it was not a good day yesterday, hopefully today will be better, I got
Well look at the bright side at least you didn’t do a fast cash
Redskins +3
Bills +7
Saints +2.5
Patriots 1H and Game totals are 6-0-1 to the under
I have Minnesota +1. I want my bet voided. No way I would have done that bet if Daniels was going to be the QB. :/
Minnesota only had 2 possessions the first half. WTF.
Last edited by ErickAA; 09-29-2019 at 01:50 PM.
VOID THIS MANS BET PEOPLE
agreed
7-0-1 for those scoring at home. I had a feeling it would be a profitable angle this year but this is crazy
Taking under 47.5 in the Sunday night game.win
3-4-1 on the year now.
Last edited by simpdog; 09-29-2019 at 07:28 PM.
No guarantees in life. Surprises happen every day. Let the buyer beware and all of that shit.
I’d be genuinely suprised if that LSU -24 line holds. I make it -34.5 vs Utah St this coming Saturday andid still take LSU.
yesterday was as bad of an NFL Sunday as i can ever remember. <Sigh>
Steelers -3.5
if verm'd means gave u a winner, then yes I did
Man gambling rehab is awful. Took away my cell phone and offshore accounts.
- The Nationals are 0-3 in winner-take-all post-season games, all at home. They've never advanced in four previous trips to the playoffs over the past eight years.
- Since a 2013 AL Division Series victory for Detroit, Scherzer has made seven post-season appearances, in a mix of starting and relieving roles, and his teams are 0-7.
- Scherzer himself is 0-4 in that stretch, lowering his career record in the post-season from 4-1 to 4-5.
- The three-time Cy Young Award winner was 11-7 with a 2.92 ERA was slowed by back trouble this season.
Somebody talk to me. I feel like I'm getting +165 on a flip.
I’ll post what I told you at GA. You look good kid. Pro and kid hockey started, right?
Nats. Period
The following is conventional thinking
Nats must win. There will be a crucifixion in Washington if they lose
They have the best rotation in the playoffs. (Except Astros of course.) EVERYONE is available. Strasburg &/or Corbin then Doolittle
The Brewers have been money. I bet them a lot in September. However, they were playing the dregs of MLB. Cakewalk.
Brewers are depleted. The rest will be pitched around.
Woodruff may not last long. He is fresh off shoulder surgery. They do have Hader but the damage may already be done.
Scherzer’s numbers have been good after his return except ERA. ERA is a public stat.
Scherzer or Cards Flaherty may be this year’s Bumgarner in playoffs. Scherzer is an animal. Flaherty is Pedro Martinez (almost serious)
Last edited by Sanlmar; 10-01-2019 at 08:06 AM.
What a dreadful couple of wagering days. NFL only. Baseball done
Been a tough transition.
Scherzer’s numbers have been good after his return except ERA. ERA is a public stat.
Thinking one thing and typing another. I’m losing it
Mostly on my knees with an AMZN trade
I feel compelled to try to prevent financial distress in our community
The Oakland A’s have 97 regular season wins. Absorb that. 97 wins.
This is a number similar to the Venezuelan bolívar. Inflation y’all. Haves & have nots.
Each series and each game’s matchups must be treated in isolation.
You are gonna hear a lot of noise about variance and crying. These people didn’t read the sentence above. You can’t help them.
The Dodger wins # is just a number. It is not a historical achievement in real terms. Look at September’s Dodger schedule and try not to laugh.
Yankees are not exempt from similar regard. Maybe disregard.
Don’t look for value in playoffs. Choose winners. Dodgers and Yankees, to continue our examples, are gonna skew the numbers. Don’t chase dog lottery tickets. Do the matchups. This is like the NFL. You don’t have large numbers to fuck around with value.
Multiple posting was done with the express permission of lol wow. So bite me.
Last edited by Sanlmar; 10-01-2019 at 09:42 AM.
just saw this on 'lock it in'...
under 4.5 HRs in MLW/WSH -120...
very odd there...
There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)
Reply With Quote