YupOriginally Posted by Dan Druff
Yup
Tease both games. Tampa +10.5 and Bills +9.5
Great pick brother
I also had this parlayed with TB over 51.5 close to making this a huge day Fla helped as did Druffs picks especially utah
U guys played great today.
If you are really going to do this I def wait to do it on the GB game. That will close 4/5
Lets all not forget TB beat the fck out of GB once already.
New Orleans also beat the fck out of TB twice
I have a tidbit for you all.
Everyone saying that its hard to beat a team 3 times in one season in the NFL
After the Browns beat the Steelers last week and TB beat NO today
The team that is going for the sweep has won 21 times and only lost 16 times.
Use that shit next year.
Its not true. Though it was this year.
OSA, please don't ever tease any dogs bigger than +2.5 or favorites bigger than -8.5.
When you do this +4.5 -> +10.5 crap, it makes the entire forum cry.
man the PFA run good was real today...got IND/LAC U 229.5 after the buzzer ended Q1...for some reason the algo dropped the line immediately to 224.5 after i bet it...shit gets funky after Q1 for like 0.5 to 1.0 points, but dont think i ever saw a massive drop like this...
final score...129-96...
Yeah 100%.
We can you you through the math on it if you want. Unless you cross 3 and 7 in football, and it low scoring games to boot, you should parlay not tease.
In the 8ish years I’ve been sharing plays I don’t think I’ve ever shared one quite as shitty as this.
I subscribe heavily to the Red Auerbach theory “it doesn’t matter if you lose by 2 or 20 it’s still a loss” sort of thing. I also think you can’t get caught up in results. It’s either a good bet or a bad bet when it’s made. I think I could argue with the numbers that I’d willingly make this play again.
4 targets 0 catches - and what’s worse is he looked fucking awful doing it. Shit the pick 6 was a ball thrown his way.
We move on.
I have watched a lot of Brees in my life, although not as much this year. Watched most of this game and was real surprised how weak his arm has gotten. No zip at all, just soft floaters. Hard to blame any of the WRs too much when that is what they are working with.In the 8ish years I’ve been sharing plays I don’t think I’ve ever shared one quite as shitty as this.
I subscribe heavily to the Red Auerbach theory “it doesn’t matter if you lose by 2 or 20 it’s still a loss” sort of thing. I also think you can’t get caught up in results. It’s either a good bet or a bad bet when it’s made. I think I could argue with the numbers that I’d willingly make this play again.
4 targets 0 catches - and what’s worse is he looked fucking awful doing it. Shit the pick 6 was a ball thrown his way.
We move on.
My book puts line up for next weeks playoff game right away, as a lot of books do. Anyways right after the Chiefs game ended I was curious because of the Mahomes concussion thing, and there was a line, which seems to assume Mahomes will play. Anyways, the total was also 55.5, which seems insanely high given how these playoffs have gone. I took under 55.5, and it is already done to 54, so glad I anticipated that one.
Here’s some stupid holiday wagering
3 team teaser +160
Basketball - 882 UNLV -7 for Game
Basketball - 877 Wyoming +1 for Game
Basketball - 876 Louisville +1 for Game
Use it as a filter or use it to mock me later.
I bought a little Bills +3. Concussion has value here. No other reason.
Is this not the weakest collection of NFL teams we are left with? What are people saying?
The skunkworks is hard at work on hockey
BOL stories
I got paid before the end of the Tampa Bay game last night. That never happens on BOL.
I’m noticing some data feed issues for hockey. It’s not just with BOL. It’s a feed shared by many.
I mentioned I got paid on a totals bet I should not have. I bet over 6.5 on Lightning Hawks Weds 1/13. In real life it ended 6. I was so confused I went to SportsBookReview and screen shot when that was wrong too.
ACTUAL
FUCKED UP FEED
The last game of that Weds night I’m watching the score box in the corner of my television.for the late Edmonton game. It flashes “Final”. The game is still playing. It’s like the 1st period. BOOM the live wagering window went to lockdown and never reopened.
Some odd shit.
I’ve seen some other shit that mostly has to do with slow adjustments by the live wagering service. Some really sloppy stuff that’s harder to describe.
Finally, I made a payout request and received my money in my BTC wallet in less than an hour. I haven’t had anything like that happen since 2004 or something.
Last edited by Sanlmar; 01-18-2021 at 12:25 PM.
Lots of stats feeds were screwy the first few days of NHL. Things seem to be back to normal.
1st periods today
Leafs over 1.5 -140ish
Bruins under 1.5 -120
Forum drama is really dragging on me, I barely wanted to post these. If it keeps up will likely start looking for other forums.
Yesterday's big bet paid off hoping for a nice 2-0 day today.
flawless first for the BOS game...let's see some red lights in the second one...
Immaculate.
Wish I could gamble like that
Looking for a quick score, so I don't have to pay my AMEX bill later this week, which is a $1K. Can someone give me a legit half time score tonight? Please?
NBA coming up in a few mins:
Milwaukee vs Brooklyn - Under 240.5
Second game was the same. But we had the over.Immaculate.
Wish I could gamble like that
I got a craving for salami. under that is.Second game was the same. But we had the over.
goose eggs everywhere
Well, this Bucks game isn't going like I had hoped.
These 240 type totals lines are always one of those things where you're assessing the chance that it won't just be a no-defense score fest, and if it's better than 52.38%, you fire.
Lines over 240 require consistent high scoring to go over, so if there's any real scoring drought, it falls under. However, sometimes it's just a fast-paced shoot-fest, and you get crushed.
This was looking okay for awhile, and was a favorite at halftime to win. However, the third quarter sucked (70 points), and given that the game is close, we are looking at a likely loss now.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Reply With Quote