My book has Indiana +1 -110. Know nothing about this, but gonna fireOriginally Posted by Dan Druff
My book has Indiana +1 -110. Know nothing about this, but gonna fire
well at least you didn't have to sweat missing the top of the market on albot, san...
i allowed myself to get suckered in to the KC-SF teaser, which is looking quite good right now (34-7 SF), but still feeling like a sucker for not betting both faves SU or parlaying.
think the tease was the way to go over parlaying SU...
err i meant betting both at -7.5think the tease was the way to go over parlaying SU...
although here comes GB....
Aight Krypt, I’m getting pissed.
I took this couple days ago
Lanovic v Kyle Edmunds 9pm
It is now +127 —> +171. Kyle Edmunds is a slow witted player who didn’t look good against big ol’ Isner. Kid needs to only play grass or clay.
You have, no doubt, recognized my brand as ridiculing stupid sharps when they disagree with me and I use sharps to confirm my handicap. Give me credit for not blind following them.
In this instance, the sharps are the dumb money. Feel free to unload.
I’m officially annoyed now. Why do I have to correct all these mistakes?
Why was match canceled? Can't find on open bets wtf
be willing to bet the chair suspended it...think I read on the bottom line on ESPN that they have discretion to do that with the wildfires...Aight Krypt, I’m getting pissed.
I took this couple days ago
Lanovic v Kyle Edmunds 9pm
It is now +127 —> +171. Kyle Edmunds is a slow witted player who didn’t look good against big ol’ Isner. Kid needs to only play grass or clay.
You have, no doubt, recognized my brand as ridiculing stupid sharps when they disagree with me and I use sharps to confirm my handicap. Give me credit for not blind following them.
In this instance, the sharps are the dumb money. Feel free to unload.
I’m officially annoyed now. Why do I have to correct all these mistakes?
Why was match canceled? Can't find on open bets wtf
Aight Krypt, I’m getting pissed.
I took this couple days ago
Lanovic v Kyle Edmunds 9pm
It is now +127 —> +171. Kyle Edmunds is a slow witted player who didn’t look good against big ol’ Isner. Kid needs to only play grass or clay.
You have, no doubt, recognized my brand as ridiculing stupid sharps when they disagree with me and I use sharps to confirm my handicap. Give me credit for not blind following them.
In this instance, the sharps are the dumb money. Feel free to unload.
I’m officially annoyed now. Why do I have to correct all these mistakes?
perfect time to bet him now then?
he is +390 on live betting and the match is in rain delay... he's down 5-2 in the 1st set but they go best of 5 sets don't they? so plenty of time for a comeback?
I spent most of the game regretting the Pacers -1 pick and it covered by 9.
oooooooookay
yup 5 sets in the majors...Aight Krypt, I’m getting pissed.
I took this couple days ago
Lanovic v Kyle Edmunds 9pm
It is now +127 —> +171. Kyle Edmunds is a slow witted player who didn’t look good against big ol’ Isner. Kid needs to only play grass or clay.
You have, no doubt, recognized my brand as ridiculing stupid sharps when they disagree with me and I use sharps to confirm my handicap. Give me credit for not blind following them.
In this instance, the sharps are the dumb money. Feel free to unload.
I’m officially annoyed now. Why do I have to correct all these mistakes?
perfect time to bet him now then?
he is +390 on live betting and the match is in rain delay... he's down 5-2 in the 1st set but they go best of 5 sets don't they? so plenty of time for a comeback?
early thoughts on the big game?
Thinking I like the KC -1 and over 53.5
well san we don't even get to bet against 'mr 5 cent head'...
shapo already lost his shit and his place in the tournament...
didn't even think to check if he was a big favorite in that match...
yup 5 sets in the majors...
well in reality he's only down 1 break in the very 1st set... any idea why the live odds would be -703 for his opponent and +390 for him?
either way i already took it for a small bet, how can one go wrong taking a Sanlmar lock at +390?
Lot of tomfoolery going on at the offshore books. I’ve read that not only was Bovada and sportsbook playing games with Sharp/square lines but so was BOL. All three were advertising “3” as the number but anyone who wanted San Fran it went to a review and then came back as +1. I know this happened with a few people.
For what it’s worth this is literally the sharpest game of the year by a magnitude of 100. I make San Fran the small favorite but Not demonstrably so. Early indicators said public flocked to KC and there has been professional money looking to take the 1-2 points or the +110 ML. I don’t think there will be much of a story on the line leading up to the game. I don’t see it hitting 3 and I don’t see it jumping the fence.
Now it’s hurry up and wait for the props..
I find it hard to believe BOL was doing that. That definitely is the profile for Bovada and Druff has written extensively about it. We KNOW that is their practice.
Lot of tomfoolery going on at the offshore books. I’ve read that not only was Bovada and sportsbook playing games with Sharp/square lines but so was BOL. All three were advertising “3” as the number but anyone who wanted San Fran it went to a review and then came back as +1. I know this happened with a few people.
For what it’s worth this is literally the sharpest game of the year by a magnitude of 100. I make San Fran the small favorite but Not demonstrably so. Early indicators said public flocked to KC and there has been professional money looking to take the 1-2 points or the +110 ML. I don’t think there will be much of a story on the line leading up to the game. I don’t see it hitting 3 and I don’t see it jumping the fence.
Now it’s hurry up and wait for the props..
BOL originates it’s own lines. Interesting to me, they took a Pinnacle trader and a BWIN trader for instance. On some sports they are running their own live action and not using a service.
They are first overnight with baseball lines. Before Pinny. That was very important to me. I don’t follow NFL overnight so I’ll step back a tad there.
Bovada has small NFL limits compared to BOL. BOL will take $25k and $50k from some.
So when they are originating lines the amounts are low and BOL don’t give a fuck. They know who you are and what that bet means.
Bovada is a square book that copycats other books and does shading.
It’s impossible to conflate those two books. They couldn’t be more different.
Heads is +110 on my book. Suckers bet imo. I like Tails -120
Hope everyone had a great weekend. Had the over in last night's GB/SF game and won easy but otherwise took it easy this weekend.
Hate paying this much juice on a puck line, but Detroit is awful and content to lose.
Colorado -1.5 -160
Bonus pick - I'm waiting/hoping for 230 but Raptors/Atlanta under 230.
Edit: Got under 230 just before gametime line went up to 231. Apparently should have took some Hawks ML or +10 as well.
Last edited by simpdog; 01-20-2020 at 12:51 PM.
tennis picks - one cancelled and another suspended. Those were the highlights
Remember Druff mocking Searles & the Royals? Imagine Sizzle bet Druff the city of Kansas City would win another Championship before Los Angeles.
What a lock that would have been. How about them Rams?
Druff is getting old and it is pretty likely he will never see a parade before he dies.
Shapo,
Yeah, when the player is arguing with the ump that he didn’t break his racquet when he smashed it on the ground you know. I was trying to buy low on him but he is untouchable. He could never lose a set from this point on and I’ll have no regrets.
Canadians.... Why didn’t this Jew play hockey instead?
Last edited by Sanlmar; 01-20-2020 at 11:33 AM.
OBV it is b/c i didn't tail.
tennis picks - one cancelled and another suspended. Those were the highlights
So what happens with the suspended one? My book's rules say as long as it is completed the bet stands. Is this going to be resumed later or what is going to happen?
There are currently 16 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 16 guests)
Reply With Quote
