Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Obama executive order to force 'diversity' in thousands of US neighborhoods

  1. #1
    Diamond DRK Star's Avatar
    Reputation
    1282
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    8,401
    Load Metric
    68036536

    Obama executive order to force 'diversity' in thousands of US neighborhoods

    http://www.examiner.com/article/obam...-neighborhoods

    Obama executive order to force 'diversity' in thousands of US neighborhoods


    A report published this morning by The Hill says President Barack Obama is pressing forward with new Department of Housing and Urban Development regulations that will withhold block grants to communities if they don’t build enough "affordable housing in wealthy neighborhoods." The executive order, known as the “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Act,” was issued by the president last year and will be used to promote racial quotas in white suburban neighborhoods. It will also force thousands of communities to house the nation’s burgeoning population of new immigrants.

    “HUD is working with communities across the country to fulfill the promise of equal opportunity for all,” a spokesperson for the federal agency said, according to the Hill report. “The proposed policy seeks to break down barriers to access to opportunity in communities supported by HUD funds.”

    In other words, it doesn't matter that the families who currently live in these neighborhoods worked hard to achieve their American Dream. It is racist to deny that same outcome to those who haven't worked for it. It should just be handed to them out of "fairness."

    According to the Hill, "HUD says it is obligated to take the action under the Fair Housing Act of 1968, which prohibited direct and intentional housing discrimination, such as a real estate agent not showing a home in a wealthy neighborhood to a black family or a bank not providing a loan based on someone’s race."

    The Hill quoted Debby Goldberg, vice president at the National Fair Housing Alliance, who said the country has “a history of putting affordable housing in poor communities, and this regulation would rectify that perceived bias."

    World Net Daily was the first news outlet to report on the new HUD rules in an article published last July. The regulations are due to come into effect later this month. In order to qualify for federal grant money, WND says "cities would have to look at their communities’ patterns of segregation and devise plans to counter them."

    The president is pushing the plan in spite of widespread public opposition to his executive order. The Hill report says the regulations will impact up to 1,250 municipal governments across the nation.

    There is currently an effort underway in the House of Representatives to block the new regulations. Rep. Paul Gosar, (R-AZ) is spearheading that effort.

    “American citizens and communities should be free to choose where they would like to live and not be subject to federal neighborhood engineering at the behest of an overreaching federal government,” Gosar told the Hill.

    Heritage Foundation fellow Hans von Spakovsky told the Hill that "the regulations seemed to be yet another way for Obama to inject race into a policy discussion."

    “It’s a sign that this administration seems to take race into account on everything,” von Spakovsky said in a statement to the Hill.

    House Republicans are trying to block the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule by amending HUD's funding bill this week with language that would prohibit the agency from enacting the new regulations. HUD claims that the new rules will break down racial barriers, but Gosar believes the regulations will have negative repercussions.

    “Instead of living with neighbors you like and choose, this breaks up the core fabric of how we start to look at communities,” Gosar said to the Hill. “That just brings unease to everyone in that area.”

    “People have to feel comfortable where they live,” he added. “If I don’t feel comfortable in my own backyard, where do I feel comfortable?”

    Critics also say the regulations are designed to skew the voter demographic in areas that have traditionally voted Republican. By moving minorities into the neighborhoods, the left hopes to win elections in districts where they previously had few voters.



    <story from mid 2015 but I never heard about this and found it interesting>

     
    Comments
      
      ftpjesus: [plain]Its called tilting the voting blocks because by forcing liberal welfare types into the rich areas it dilutes the voting power of the GOP types and raises the chances they can turn the district democrat. Its nothing but racial gerrymandering[/p
    Quote Originally Posted by Tyde View Post
    (I'm) a little preoccupied in Thailand right now

  2. #2
    Photoballer 4Dragons's Avatar
    Reputation
    2686
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    10,648
    Load Metric
    68036536
    Just remember people: There is no outcry for diversity in an all black neighborhood.

  3. #3
    Gold gauchojake's Avatar
    Reputation
    584
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Zipolite
    Posts
    2,450
    Load Metric
    68036536
    Gentrification is racist

  4. #4
    Platinum herbertstemple's Avatar
    Reputation
    288
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,211
    Load Metric
    68036536
    LOL

    This is the democrats trying to get minorities into the suburbs so they can vote for democrats. This was the beginning of the housing crisis. Here we go again.

     
    Comments
      
      ftpjesus: yeah you beat me to it slightly

  5. #5
    Gold gauchojake's Avatar
    Reputation
    584
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Zipolite
    Posts
    2,450
    Load Metric
    68036536
    As Drk noted in his post this is old "news". You can read the HUD final rule in the link below. Basically if you take HUD money, you follow their rules which include building affordable housing. I didn't read through the whole thing but it looks like HUD updated the way that they report data on the areas they serve. It's a way to enforce compliance is what I read. Come to think of it I have seen more minorities milling around in the crosswalks near my house...

    https://www.huduser.gov/portal/affht_pt.html#final-rule

     
    Comments
      
      herbertstemple: Buy a gun while you still can.

  6. #6
    100% Organic MumblesBadly's Avatar
    Reputation
    94
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In the many threads of this forum
    Posts
    9,408
    Load Metric
    68036536
    The title of this thread is in error. This initiative isn't going to "force" any city to do anything. As stated in the first paragraph, the Feds will at most WITHHOLD FUNDS. If a city/municipality doesn't want this *handout* from the federal government, don't bother following the conditions.

     
    Comments
      
      VaughnP: You know nothing.
      
      herbertstemple: You don't know anything abour American politics. This is just a first step.
    _____________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I actually hope this [second impeachment] succeeds, because I want Trump put down politically like a sick, 14-year-old dog. ... I don't want him complicating the 2024 primary season. I just want him done.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Were Republicans cowardly or unethical not to go along with [convicting Trump in the second impeachment Senate trial]? No. The smart move was to reject it.

  7. #7
    Photoballer 4Dragons's Avatar
    Reputation
    2686
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    10,648
    Load Metric
    68036536
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post
    The title of this thread is in error. This initiative isn't going to "force" any city to do anything. As stated in the first paragraph, the Feds will at most WITHHOLD FUNDS. If a city/municipality doesn't want this *handout* from the federal government, don't bother following the conditions.
    Please go read this and try to catch up.

    Name:  2527900.jpg
Views: 501
Size:  56.9 KB

  8. #8
    100% Organic MumblesBadly's Avatar
    Reputation
    94
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In the many threads of this forum
    Posts
    9,408
    Load Metric
    68036536
    Quote Originally Posted by 4Dragons View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post
    The title of this thread is in error. This initiative isn't going to "force" any city to do anything. As stated in the first paragraph, the Feds will at most WITHHOLD FUNDS. If a city/municipality doesn't want this *handout* from the federal government, don't bother following the conditions.
    Please go read this and try to catch up.

    Name:  2527900.jpg
Views: 501
Size:  56.9 KB
    Here's the underlying issue: Federal policies this one use "bribing" states or municipalities into doing certain things. If those government get hooked on such federal inducements, but can't meet the requirements, tough shit. Let those governments manage their libertarian utopias without that federal largess.
    _____________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I actually hope this [second impeachment] succeeds, because I want Trump put down politically like a sick, 14-year-old dog. ... I don't want him complicating the 2024 primary season. I just want him done.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Were Republicans cowardly or unethical not to go along with [convicting Trump in the second impeachment Senate trial]? No. The smart move was to reject it.

  9. #9
    Diamond Pro Zap_the_Fractions_Giraffe's Avatar
    Reputation
    1416
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    3,795
    Load Metric
    68036536

     
    Comments
      
      herbertstemple: Barak Obama a woman?

  10. #10
    Platinum
    Reputation
    21
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,110
    Load Metric
    68036536
    PFA radio intro? one time

  11. #11
    Silver VaughnP's Avatar
    Reputation
    152
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    893
    Load Metric
    68036536
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post
    The title of this thread is in error. This initiative isn't going to "force" any city to do anything. As stated in the first paragraph, the Feds will at most WITHHOLD FUNDS. If a city/municipality doesn't want this *handout* from the federal government, don't bother following the conditions.
    Why are there so many of this type of people ^ who preach from the perspective that it is the government doing all of us favors and blessing us with their *handouts* -- it's like these fucking morons seriously forget that the government is 100% tax payer funded. And I promise you that the people who are against this kind of bullshit in question paid much more in federal income taxes than those who are for it.

     
    Comments
      
      herbertstemple: They are called socialists.

  12. #12
    Diamond hongkonger's Avatar
    Reputation
    706
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5,640
    Load Metric
    68036536
    Quote Originally Posted by VaughnP View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post
    The title of this thread is in error. This initiative isn't going to "force" any city to do anything. As stated in the first paragraph, the Feds will at most WITHHOLD FUNDS. If a city/municipality doesn't want this *handout* from the federal government, don't bother following the conditions.
    Why are there so many of this type of people ^ who preach from the perspective that it is the government doing all of us favors and blessing us with their *handouts* -- it's like these fucking morons seriously forget that the government is 100% tax payer funded. And I promise you that the people who are against this kind of bullshit in question paid much more in federal income taxes than those who are for it.
    That's where you're wrong. Almost every red state receives more money from the federal government than its residents pay in federal taxes. https://wallethub.com/edu/states-mos...vernment/2700/

    And the 10 states who boast the smallest percentage of their residents paying any federal tax at all are all red except FL and NM that are swing states. http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_recko...our_taxes.html

     
    Comments
      
      herbertstemple: Tmose red states have lots of blacks in them.
      
      NaturalBornHustler: ^^ Because, poor n-words

  13. #13
    Diamond hongkonger's Avatar
    Reputation
    706
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5,640
    Load Metric
    68036536
    Quote Originally Posted by 4Dragons View Post
    Just remember people: There is no outcry for diversity in an all black neighborhood.
    I disagree. Whenever there's only a Popeye's there always seems to be agitation for a Church's.

  14. #14
    Bronze
    Reputation
    64
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Las Vegas, Nv
    Posts
    424
    Load Metric
    68036536
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post
    The title of this thread is in error. This initiative isn't going to "force" any city to do anything. As stated in the first paragraph, the Feds will at most WITHHOLD FUNDS. If a city/municipality doesn't want this *handout* from the federal government, don't bother following the conditions.

    This is how things are done and it works every time...two great examples

    Lowering BAC levels from .10 to .08...that's fine don't do it, we will withhold money for roads

    Seatbelt from secondary violation to primary violation..don't have to do it, we just withhold money if you don't

    It's easy to say you dont have to take the money...but the money isn't just chump change either. And where else are communities going to get the money from, raising taxes?

  15. #15
    Photoballer 4Dragons's Avatar
    Reputation
    2686
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    10,648
    Load Metric
    68036536
    Quote Originally Posted by hongkonger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by 4Dragons View Post
    Just remember people: There is no outcry for diversity in an all black neighborhood.
    I disagree. Whenever there's only a Popeye's there always seems to be agitation for a Church's.

  16. #16
    100% Organic MumblesBadly's Avatar
    Reputation
    94
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In the many threads of this forum
    Posts
    9,408
    Load Metric
    68036536
    Quote Originally Posted by lvpkr1009 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post
    The title of this thread is in error. This initiative isn't going to "force" any city to do anything. As stated in the first paragraph, the Feds will at most WITHHOLD FUNDS. If a city/municipality doesn't want this *handout* from the federal government, don't bother following the conditions.

    This is how things are done and it works every time...two great examples

    Lowering BAC levels from .10 to .08...that's fine don't do it, we will withhold money for roads

    Seatbelt from secondary violation to primary violation..don't have to do it, we just withhold money if you don't

    It's easy to say you dont have to take the money...but the money isn't just chump change either. And where else are communities going to get the money from, raising taxes?
    Why do the local governments have to spend the money? Why can't they practice what the GOP preaches and shrink the local governments small enough to "drown in a bathtub". And let free enterprise address the needs of the citizens?
    _____________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I actually hope this [second impeachment] succeeds, because I want Trump put down politically like a sick, 14-year-old dog. ... I don't want him complicating the 2024 primary season. I just want him done.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Were Republicans cowardly or unethical not to go along with [convicting Trump in the second impeachment Senate trial]? No. The smart move was to reject it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 137
    Last Post: 01-01-2018, 07:31 AM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-30-2015, 02:10 PM
  3. Cultural diversity
    By splitthis in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-16-2014, 08:55 AM
  4. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 07-12-2014, 05:06 AM
  5. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-13-2013, 08:33 PM