Originally Posted by
4BET
I still think this bet is +EV
Doing some "back of the envelope" calculations, I'm starting to agree with those who are saying it's pretty neutral EV with the One Drop included, although I’m still thinking it is +EV to take the Anti- Bracelet side.
I’m curious as to what some of you poker-minded and math-minded people think about the following:
By my count, there are thirteen 10k events that they will both likely play (#5, 10, 13, 18, 22, 28, 32, 38, 40, 46, 52, 61 and 64). I'm not even including the Main Event in this because imo they are such long shots to win that. Besides 10k events, there is Event #2 25k Mix Max, Event #57 Million Dollar One Drop, and some amount of random smaller buy-in larger field events sprinkled throughout that they will likely play, especially if their incentive to win a bracelet is large enough.
(1) I'm giving them each a (very conservative) 60:1 shot at winning a bracelet in Event #2, 5, 10, 13 ,18, 28, 38, 52 and 61. These are mostly the 10k events that I think have the best chances of being “small field” events. (Maybe this is a gross over-estimate of their chances in any one of these nine events?)
(2) I'm giving them each a 120:1 shot at winning a bracelet in the 10k HORSE, the 10k NLHE 6-max, the 10k Heads Up NLHE event, the 50k Players Championship and the 10k PLO Event. I think these events will have substantially larger fields, and so 120:1 seemed fair, yet very conservative, factoring in skill level and anticipated field size.
(3) I'm giving them a 40:1 shot each to win the One Drop. There is a 56 player cap on this event, and a fair number of rich businessmen play.
(4) With regard to the smaller buy-in large field events, considering their propensity to "multi-table" and try to run up their stacks, as well as larger field sizes, but also considering that many of the events listed above are three, four and five day events, which limits their ability to go deep in and play concurrent tournaments, I'll allow for FOUR random large-field events each (so 8 total), at a 480:1 shot for each event... (so, Eight 480:1 shots). Here I am probably under-estimating the number of events they will play, but probably over-estimating their chances to win in one of these events, considering large field size and their general concentration levels at the earlier stages of these events.
Again... back of the envelope type calculations.... doing some simple arithmetic and algebra.... To summarize, between both Daniel and Phil:
(1) 18 total 60:1 shots (or 36 total 120:1 shots)
(2) 10 total 120:1 shots
(3) 2 total 40:1 shots (or 6 total 120:1 shots); and
(4) 8 total 480:1 shots (or 2 total 120:1 shots).
.... for a grand total of 54 total 120:1 shots. Not a landslide “bet the farm” by any means, but still +EV to take the Anti Side.
Comments and persuasive criticisms welcome before PFA collectively pulls the trigger on this bet.