Deja Haseeb

[haleylh]

Anybody following that latest Haseeb Qureshi thread over at 4, in which the infamous Haseeb claims all these charitable donations for like $500,000, and then can't back up more than about $45K of with real docs?

1) The name "Jasep" did come to mind;

2) I'm also reminded that a lot of con artists also do give a lot of money, as it helps them convince those near them that they're really really really good people. Except that it's easy to be generous with other people's money. Noted poker example: Russ Hamilton, who was a generous benefactor to several charities.

And on that note, Merry Christmas.

[SpewArtist]

Cliffs to this?

I saw the thread blowing up but have no idea what's going down.

[Ryback_feed_me_more]

Cliffs to this?

I saw the thread blowing up but have no idea what's going down.

Cliffs: Haseeb aka DogIsHead a well known infamous scammer associated with the whole Girah fiasco claims he is quitting poker, and giving all his money away to charity except 10K. Real Cliffs: Dude is full of shit as usual and is in desperate need of a mental enema.

[BeerAndPoker]

Haseeb thinks it's a game! He thinks it's a fucking game!

[yaahello]

thread is gold, has ex girlfriend come in, has an escort who is friends with dog come in as well.

[Dan Druff]

So I got involved in that 2+2 thread.

As usual, I regret it. It has degenerated into a whole mess of terrible, with people completely ignoring obvious logic.

Haseeb himself PM'd me and wants to have a conversation with me.

Bsaically, the most notable part of the thread involves two supposed women who appeared there, both of whom know Haseeb personally.

One posted as "OpheliaMayRose", and claims to be a prostitute with college degrees in mathematics and literature. She writes incredibly like Haseeb. Here was her original post:

I don't understand one of the arguments here. People suspect that Haseeb is guilty of things for which there is no evidence because (i) he was friends with an admitted scammer, and (ii) it's not believable that a clever person--Haseeb is clearly clever--could be duped by a scammer for long. So Haseeb must also be a scammer.

Here's the problem. Haseeb knew Jose for, what, less than a year? But Haseeb was himself a part of the poker community for four or five years. You guys were friends with him. You worked and played with him and respected him as a player and teacher. Not a single person suspected Haseeb of being a scammer before the Jose incident. Did you? I wasn't around, so someone enlighten me if I'm wrong.

So what is the deal? If your argument makes Haseeb a scammer, then it also makes everyone else in the poker community a scammer or an idiot or both.

I think I know Haseeb pretty well. I've been close friends with him for a year and a half. He refused to talk poker math with me when I was reading his book, so I made an account here a few months ago to find a teacher. He asked me last week to keep an eye out for a thread about him and to try to counter obviously false claims (e.g., that Jose was not even a real person). It sounded like a reasonable response to the insane stuff that some people say here, but it turns out that I can't pretend to be an NVGer.

I think Haseeb has some secrets. He grew up a Muslim in central Texas and an atheist in a Muslim family. Then he became a poker player. So it's not surprising that he never learned to be forthright and unguarded. That doesn't make him wholly, irredeemably evil or deserving of hatred. Some of you blow his faults out of all proportion.

She also went on to post this:

How do you have any clue what my work is like? I work for myself. No one but me and my clients know what happens between us.

You're also assuming, incorrectly, that I have an ethical issue with my work. I don't. I never did. It's not a sacrifice for me. I didn't have to compromise anything or cross any line for it. I don't believe that I am doing anything wrong. I think the US sex laws are outdated and sexist. This is the best job I've ever had. I am making money in a lucrative industry while I have the opportunity. If I were a man, you'd call that being smart. It's what all you poker players are trying to do.

That's right. You don't know about my background. My mom was an abusive alcoholic, and my dad slit her throat and killed her new husband when I was 9. She survived. He went to prison. She started drinking and abusing me and my siblings. I ran away when I was 10. Stuff got worse. By the time I was 13, she would kick me out, or I would leave. I was homeless from 13 to 15. I got in lots of trouble. I dropped out of high school when I was 16 to start working and move out of my house.

I worked in restaurants for the next 10 years while I educated myself in math, physics, neuroscience, philosophy, and linguistics. I worked my way back to school and got a degree in math and linguistics from a top school here outside of Boston. I was miserable doing math research a couple summers ago, so I decided to take a break from school, make some money, pay off my student loans, and do some writing. Then I met Haseeb, and now I'm wasting my time here defending myself to you guys because I think he's worth it.

What's your background?

Here is one of OpheliaMayRose's many hooker websites: https://www.slixa.com/ophelia-may-rose


Also appearing was "Rachel" aka "UseHerName", supposedly Haseeb's ex. Rachel claimed to be a London-based lawyer, and unlike Ophelia, is anti-Haseeb:

I've just spent hours in one of Haseeb's infamous Skype sessions of projection, ranting and contrition (rinse and repeat).

Ever the gent he has issued veiled threats to 'expose' me on the Internet, tried to get me to confess to some bogus weirdness which apparently involved hacking and voice modulators for which he has no proof, then (and this is the priceless part) has threatened my career. Why, because he's **** scared and wants me to think if I say anything he will have the 'she's a nutty liar' defence.

Well Haseeb, I don't respond well to threats.

My name is xxxxxx (hi). I'm a city lawyer in London and I knew Haseeb very well (internet bull**** romance....don't judge me..ok judge me if you like but how was I to know he was mad as a box of frogs). Our dalliance was over the prop bet/girah/fall from grace period (so maybe you get why hes bricking it). I got dragged into this by Haseebs hooker ex/girlfriend not sure which... also called xxxxx I believe and from Boston (stay with me) who thought someone was me, but they were someone else.

Haseeb asked me for 80k as he was going to lose his house.. well he didn't ask he emailed. He also emailed jungle and Jose...yep girah...that fiendish villain that he has nothing to do with. This was late august this year. Yet suddenly he has half a million. Shall I continue with this story? Its got interesting since your Skype rant. Putting the house in a parents name when they paid the mortgage off doesn't seem so altruistic as gifting huh.

Or maybe the one about the night of the exposure of the girah scandal and the Skype calls and damage control machine in overdrive.

Or another one... the prop bet and aftermath...the rise of girah

(BTW Haseeb why do you think you are owed payment for stuff I did the copy reading/editing/etc for?)

I'm an open book, just flick my pages.

Haseeb responds with:

Oh, man. Rachel?

Okay, I guess she wants to talk about this. Cliffnotes version: a fake online dating account messaged me from San Antonio, was really attractive and nice and asked me lots of questions about my previous relationship (with Rachel). I say bad stuff about her, saying how bad the relationship was. Fake online account tried to convince me that Rachel was awesome and I was in the wrong for all my complaints about her. Soon I realize fake account is fake because is unwilling to meet, talk, or cam, so I stop talking to it.

Months later, my computer gets hacked in a pretty hardcore way. Rachel claims that the hacker sent her copies of all of the chat logs with this fake online dating account, which incidentally include me badmouthing her (the hacker sent apparently no one else anything. Rather odd; I'd been hacked before, but hackers are usually after money. Or if they want to sabotage someone, they do it more widely, not just to one random ex. Also, Rachel had a hacker ex-boyfriend that she'd often tell me about). From there, the story gets even more insane, but that's the basic outline.

[/TMI]

Then Haseeb goes on to make another post where he says that Rachel was the actual hacker, but I'll spare you that.

He and "Rachel" fight back and forth for awhile.

But I noticed something... their posts NEVER overlap. That is, when one writes a long post, the other stops posting -- clear evidence that only one person is operating all accounts.

Here is my post on 2+2 about the matter:

Gentlemen,

I have been away from 2+2 for over 2 weeks due to a vacation. I am a bit late to the party, and am spending my Friday night trudging through 90 pages of this garbage.

I know, tight life.

I'm about halfway through, and have already reached various conclusions. I apologize if these have already been brought up, but I wanted to get these out while still fresh in my tiring mind.

I will admit that I found this whole sordid tale fascinating, and I read this thread more as a game to unravel Haseeb's depraved little fantasy world.

Simply put, this is all fake.

Haseeb is Ophelia.

Haseeb is Rachel/UseHerName.

It is possible that there are real people techincally behind these identities, but only as shills/voices for purposes of legitimizing the lies.

Of course, none of that is anything new. People were screaming "FAKE" from the very first Ophelia-the-cultured-genius-hooker-who-inexplicably-cares-deeply-for-Hasseb post.

Rather than theorize or guess, I decided to focus upon something a bit more concrete.

There is no doubt that Haseeb is a smart guy. He's also quite creative. He specializes in internet sock puppetry. That is, he creates fascinating characters, presents them to the public, and then inserts himself into their stories for legitimacy. He gets some sort of twisted kick out of fooling people in this way, and sometimes (such as in the case of Girah), it graduates from internet forum dishonesty to cheating and scamming.

These "Ophelia" and "Rachel" characters are in the same vein as Girah, except we're substituting salacious sex and romance in the place of prodigious poker skill.

But let's step away from the conjecture and into the hard evidence.

As talented as Haseeb is with his sock puppetry, he still possesses physical limitations.

Much like a ventriloquist cannot speak as both his dummy and himself at the same time, neither can Haseeb and his various puppet accounts.

That is, Haseeb cannot answer ongoing questions here (coming to him live) without having to take a short break posting as his fake accounts.

Let's focus on the "argument" between Rachel and Haseeb starting with post #590, when Haseeb supposedly "woke up" from attempting to sleep. (Side note: It's likely Haseeb "went to sleep" to allow himself to post as his fake accounts without having to deal with the hassle of using his own account to answer questions, but he couldn't help himself when he was taking such a beating here.)

Haseeb and Rachel (UseHerName) were supposedly arguing back and forth in the next several pages. Their posts comprise a large percentage of all posts between pages 40 and 45.

In a real argument, their posts would sometimes "overlap". That is, Rachel might post something long at 12:55pm, while Haseeb would have another long post (perhaps addressed to someone else on the forum) at 12:56. You would see plenty of instances where both parties would be furiously hammering away at their keyboards, nearly simultaneously producing walls of text.

But that's not what happened here.

Like a puppeteer manipulating his dummy, Haseeb's long diatribes caused "Rachel" to go silent until he was finished typing.

Below is a list of posts from Haseeb, "Rachel", and "Ophelia" with both timestamps and the notation of LONG (long post), MEDIUM (medium length post) or SHORT (short post).

Please note that Haseeb is a fast typist (like many of us here), and can likely type out a lot of text in 10 minutes. However, it is impossible for him to type out a lot of text in, say, 1 or 2 minutes.

Starting from post #590, all times PST

Hasseeb 12:53pm MEDIUM
Ophelia 1:02pm MEDIUM
Haseeb 1:11pm LONG
Rachel 1:14pm SHORT
Haseeb 1:20pm MEDIUM
Rachel 1:28pm SHORT
Haseeb 1:30pm SHORT
Rachel 1:36pm SHORT
Haseeb 1:37pm SHORT
Rcahel 1:41pm SHORT
Haseeb 1:43pm SHORT
Hasseb 1:46pm SHORT
Rachel 1:49pm SHORT
Haseeb 1:54pm SHORT
Rachel 1:56pm SHORT
Haseeb 1:58pm SHORT
Haseeb 2:00pm SHORT
Rachel 2:03pm SHORT
Haseeb 2:04pm MEDIUM
Haseeb 2:10pm SHORT
Haseeb 2:16pm SHORT
Rachel 2:23pm SHORT
Haseeb 2:25pm SHORT
Haseeb 2:30pm MEDIUM
Haseeb 2:35pm SHORT
Haseeb 2:38pm SHORT
Haseeb 2:41pm SHORT
Haseeb 2:45pm SHORT
Rachel 2:45pm SHORT
Haseeb 2:46pm SHORT
Haseeb 2:50pm MEDIUM
Rachel 2:53pm SHORT
Haseeb 2:59pm MEDIUM
Haseeb 3:03pm SHORT
Rachel 3:03pm SHORT
Haseeb 3:10pm MEDIUM
Rachel 3:15pm SHORT
Haseeb 3:19pm MEDIUM
Rachel 3:31pm MEDIUM
Haseeb 3:33pm SHORT
Haseeb 3:37pm MEDIUM
Rachel 3:38pm SHORT

You get the picture.

Note that the times listed are when the posts are complete (submitted). So basically "Rachel" and "Ophelia" never seem to start typing, even if replying to someone other than Haseeb, until Haseeb is done posting on his account.

A good example of this is Haseeb taking 4 minutes to write a medium-length post at 3:37 (he had just posted at 3:33), and then Rachel posts a one-liner in response to GMLAW at 3:38. Notice that Rachel's post does not show up BETWEEN 3:33 and 3:37, because Haseeb is spending those 4 minutes writing his own post.

By itself, this would mean little, but every single post by "Ophelia", "Rachel", and Haseeb follow this pattern.

Bottom line: This is yet another Haseeb Qureshi lie/deception, and he's either doing it for attention whoring, book sales, or most likely both.

This guy needs serious psychological help.

I also posted this:

Expanding upon that, I went back to post #417 (page 28), where Haseeb appeared at 11:49pm (Dec 23) to explain Ophelia's presence.

Notice the same pattern of Ophelia, Rachel, and Hasseb being unable to make long posts at the same time:

Haseeb 11:49 SHORT
Haseeb 11:58 SHORT
Rachel 1:12 LONG (this was the "bombshell" post by Rachel, which likely took Haseeb an hour or so to put together)
Rachel 1:19 SHORT
Haseeb 1:20 SHORT
Rachel 1:24 SHORT
Haseeb 1:28 MEDIUM
Rachel 1:33 MEDIUM
Ophelia 1:33 SHORT
Haseeb 1:37 MEDIUM
Rcahel 1:41 SHORT
Haseeb 1:42 SHORT

And then, of course, there was Ophelia's use of "em dashes" in the exact same style Haseeb is known for.

Finally, while Ophelia has a webpage and seemed to be practically begging people to Skype her (did anyone take her up on it?), it seems somewhat dubious that she is really the hooker she claims to be.

There are absolutely ZERO reviews of her on TheEroticReview, which is a highly popular hooker review site.

She was questioned about that here: http://m.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=898462 ... where she claimed this:

You won't find any public reviews of me because I have never allowed reviews. My no-review policy is also why I won't be advertising in the Verified Provider section. Until I find/create a site that gives me the tools to truly protect my privacy and reputation, I ask my dates to respect my wishes on this matter. I have happy, loyal friends who will vouch for me privately if this is crucial to someone.

Yeah, that's not really how it works in the hooker world.

If you're really seeing enough clients in order to make a living, you are going to get reviewed whether you like it or not. There's no such thing as "not allowing reviews", just as restaurants and hotels cannot avoid reviews being published of their establishments.

I'm just conjecturing now, but it would not surprise me if "Ophelia" was just a creation of Haseeb's to screw with yet another community, and now he has unleashed "her" onto 2+2.

Rachel then showed up and responded 12 minutes after I posted, even though the thread had been dead for 6 hours prior to that.

I asked her to get on Skype with me. She demanded a 500 pound bet as to whether or not she was real, and when I refused, she wouldn't get on Skype.

Hours later, she skyped some guy named Dantes (a 2+2 mod), but by then "Rachel" could have been coached by Haseeb.

Like Girah, I believe Haseeb probably has two real females behind these identities, but the backstories are fake, and Haseeb is actually making all of the posts.

Rachel also had a very unique writing style, which abruptly vanished once I started accusing her of being fake. It's as if Haseeb forgot to continue with the writing style difference once I got him all worked up.

Anyway, a lot of idiots are still unconvinced, and think that Ophelia and Rachel are real, and that Haseeb wasn't operating their accounts.

It's pretty much Girah all over again, and morons are once again falling for it.

Mind you, this is all part of a thread which some shill created to bring up Haseeb's name, promote his new book, and make that ridiculous charity claim.

[IamGreek]

Enter stage left--Ophelia over at 4. LOL

[Bootsy Collins]

Enter stage left--Ophelia over at 4. LOL

I have posted on 2+2 with my observations about Ophelia. I have quite a few more as well.

You are making zero sense here.

Why would someone with a BA in mathematics and linguistics choose to be an escort as her profession?
1. You are not making a fraction of what you can be earning with a more respected career as an engineer, mathematician, etc etc.
2. Why would anybody risk their life night after night when they could be making more money.
3. You have shown zero proof that you are indeed the person that you claim to be.

This does not add up.

[Bootsy Collins]

I have decided to present the smoking gun that Ophelia is a lie.

Originally Posted by OpheliaMayRose View Post

4) I decided to start an escort business in the Spring of 2013 after being miserable during the above research projects in the summer of 2012. People here have already written me through the email on my site and ads, and one person posted my response in this thread.

It is actually common for escorts--especially ones like me--to have no-review policies. Here is a small sample of women who I happen to know or know of:

Google "escort 'no review' policy" for "About 863,000 results":
http://sweetashleyadams.com/faq.php
http://www.janexo.com/faq.html
http://www.alovejourney.com/policy.htm
http://www.kingtutescorts.com/index.php/policies
...

I am who I say I am. STFU.

No it is not. In fact it is the exact opposite. The reason for the reviews is to ensure the customer that the escort is not law enforcement and vice-versa. That is why hobbyists go to TER and other review sites, to protect themselves from getting arrested, scammed or even worse. The majority of the sites that you listed do not show the users face. The sites that you have listed are ones created by law enforcement targeting noobs in the hobbyist community.

I guess this dude never tried to get an escort before.

[Dan Druff]

Here is Ophelia's bombshell post on 2+2. Now I don't know what to think, though I still think Haseeb has been orchestrating all of this. It does seem that Ophelia is real to some degree, though again, the lack of any reviews really makes me wonder how real her "escort" business is.

Druff/Kilowatt, you are what rational people call a crackpot. Your theories are logically ****. More importantly, they are false. You and your fellow crackpots are so offensive in so many ways that I have to inject some truth and evidence into this thread.

My name is Rachel Basse.

1) My dad is indeed an ax-murderer:

http://www.sptimes.com/2006/12/29/No...its_inve.shtml

About 3 a.m. on Dec. 15, 1991, Keith Yunk and his wife of seven months, Anita, were sleeping in their Largo home just west of Taylor Park when they were attacked by an intruder wielding a knife and hatchet.
Keith, 31, who was stabbed 14 times, died within minutes. Anita, 34, suffered wounds to her throat, head and ribs, but survived. The attacker cut the couple's phone line, but Anita managed to get to a neighbor's house for help.

...

The detectives' attention quickly turned to Anita Yunk's ex-husband, Luther Basse, an Idaho firefighter.

2) I graduated in the spring of 2013 from Brandeis in Waltham, MA with a BA in math and linguistics:

http://www.brandeis.edu/now/2012/may/fellowships.html

Awards announced for Schiff Fellows, Undergraduate Research programs

Rachel Basse ’13 (mathematics, linguistics)
With Sheldon Joyner
“A Nonstandard Approach to the Prime Number Theorem”

I did an independent study in NSA a couple years ago...

http://people.brandeis.edu/~smalamud/ling130/

LING 130a. Semantics: truth, meaning, and language

Teaching Assistant
Rachel Basse
Quote:
http://www.naclo.cs.cmu.edu/2013/NACLO2013ROUND1.pdf

The Seventh Annual North American Computational Linguistics Olympiad

Contest Site Coordinators:
USA
Brandeis University: Rachel Basse, Jasenia Hartman, James Pustejovsky

3) I know way more math than a non-mathematician like Haseeb could pretend to know:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...7m3PhfalW3USE/

2012 Michigan REU Seminar

Speakers: Rachel Basse (Brandeis) and Claire Janke (Carnegie Mellon)

Faculty Mentor: Scott Schneider

TItle: Classifying Pairs of Hyperfinite Borel Equivalence Relations

Abstract: Let x and y be infinite sequences of natural numbers, and consider the following two equivalence relations. Say x E0 y iff x and y eventually agree, i.e., there is some j such that xi+j = yi+j. Say x Et y iff x and y can be made E0-equivalent by shifting their indices some finite amount, i.e., there are j and k such that xi+j = yi+k. We want to compare E0 and Et (and other relations) using something stronger than a homomorphism -- a reduction. A reduction is a function f from the underlying set of a relation E to the underlying set of a relation F such that x E y iff f(x) F f(y). A reduction makes F behave as if it were E and tells you that F must be at least as complicated as E. It turns out that reductions exist between E0 and Et in both directions, even if, for religious or masochistic reasons, you don’t allow yourself the axiom of choice in defining them -- and we don’t. Relations E0 and Et come from a special class that are already completely classified up to isomorphism (bijective reduction), but this information isn’t (obviously) enough to answer some interesting questions concerning them. So we have been asking when a single reduction f exists from a pair (E,F) to another pair (E’,F’) so that x E y iff f(x) E’ f(y) and also x F y iff f(x) F’ f(y). Can you always turn a pair of single reductions into a single reduction of pairs? Is there always a reduction when the relations have very nice properties? What properties will a reduction transfer from one pair to another? Is there a pair that can behave like any other pair? Our answers, let us show you them.
​
I wrote the above abstract. Note the em-dashes.
​

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/10...ence-relations

Constructing an injective reduction of equivalence relations
​...​

asked Aug 29 '12 at 11:17
Rachel Basse
Quote:
​​http://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.8028.pdf​
​Simultaneous Reducibility of Pairs of Borel Equivalence Relations

Acknowledgments. I would like to thank Andreas Blass and Rachel Basse for helpful discussions on the material in this paper.

4) I decided to start an escort business in the Spring of 2013 after being miserable during the above research projects in the summer of 2012. People here have already written me through the email on my site and ads, and one person posted my response in this thread.

It is actually common for escorts--especially ones like me--to have no-review policies. Here is a small sample of women who I happen to know or know of:

http://daniellemori.com/terms/discretion/

You may be curious as to why I have no reviews. Reviews are arguably a simpler way to gain exposure and recognition within this veiled world. I cherish my role in providing discreet companionship and in my estimation reviews work against that. Being a private person with another life, as you do, I consider having reviews an unnecessary risk. Review boards as they exist require a level of detail that is not only invasive but also legally compromising. I don’t wish to place either you or myself in a difficult situation.

http://kellyparker.net/index.php?page=faq

Do you have any reviews?

I believe our time together is just that. Time between only you and I. I will never divulge details of our fun, and I expect the same discretion from you. I understand that reviews are very popular, and I have no problem with them per se-but it’s not how I choose to promote myself. Please note: if you are someone who is a frequent poster on any of the many review boards, I would kindly request that you contact another companion to spend your valuable time with. ​
​

http://www.thebohemiancourtesan.com/#!faq/c1b47

Do you have any reviews?

Nope!

1) For reasons of my own personal moral code, and taste, I have a "no review" policy. I find a man who comes to his own conclusions and decisions wildly attractive. For those I want to attract, I have a laboriously self crafted website, a thoughtful blog (with candids), picture verification and a curious twitter account. The quality of the experience I offer and my sincerity will no doubt be reflected in the way in which I have lovingly crafted my presentation.

2) I give you my word as a professional with a reputation that I care to protect: Though I operate sans reviews, I have gone to great lengths to accurately represent myself through my website, blog, and pictures. However, in the event that you decide within the first 15 minutes of our date that you don't want to move forward, politely let me know and I will return your patronage minus any travel or arrangement expenses. I will be utterly gracious, thank you for your time, and we will part; hassle free.

I should probably say that this has yet to happen, believe it or not. But think about it....if I was some sort of ripoff artist, surely there would be word about it somewhere? Use your noggin!

http://yourjourneyintobliss.com/etiquette.php

Review Policy

I consider our time together as special and unique to us, and as such, the details of which have no place on sites that include graphic descriptions of intimate encounters and standardized ratings. My service is not geared to those who select providers on the basis of reviews, forums or discussion boards on public sites. Your privacy is of the utmost importance to me- I will always respect it and I ask that you respect mine and ours by honoring my NO review policy. I approach every session with integrity, consideration and discretion and have always had the good fortune of meeting those who value these qualities in me.

http://www.sensualistextraordinaire.com/discretion.html

Our time together is special and unique. I will never share the intimate details of our encounter with others, including, but not limited to, when giving reference checks. Please return the courtesy, and do not share private details of our time with anyone else, especially on fantasy review sites. If reviews are important to you in your decision making, I will not be the companion for you, and I wish you all the best on finding what you seek with another suitable lady. Feel free to peruse some of the ladies on my Friends page for a range of other quality options.
Google "escort 'no review' policy" for "About 863,000 results":
http://sweetashleyadams.com/faq.php
http://www.janexo.com/faq.html
http://www.alovejourney.com/policy.htm
http://www.kingtutescorts.com/index.php/policies

5) Rachel = Ophelia = the person who has been posting on this account.

Here are non-escort pictures of me:
https://plus.google.com/100454055463007547113/posts
http://www.okcupid.com/profile/iwasafraid

I edited in a reference in the above profile. CTRL+F "NVGer". Also, note the many references to Shakespeare and Hamlet and the tattoo of a quote from Hamlet on the back of my neck.

I altered my math.stackexchange profile and my escort website to reference this thread:
Quote:
http://math.stackexchange.com/users/21701/rachel

email meetophelia@gmail.com
real name Rachel Basse, of NVG

I am credited in Haseeb's book as Rachel for helping him edit it and taking his pictures. I took the pictures in Austin in November, the same time that others have pointed out that Ophelia was there.

If you still think Haseeb is controlling this account, you'll have to argue that (a) he created BOTH Rachel and Ophelia fake identities many years ago, or (b) he just outed this real-life escort or falsely linked her with this real-life math woman. If you think (b) is the case, send emails to Rachel and Ophelia and post the responses you get.

Also, people can get email notifications when someone posts in their subscribed threads and hence know when new posts are made. And discussions work by taking turns. It's expected that people who are having a discussion with each other don't all post at the same time. That would not work. Trust me--I have a degree in this ****.

I am who I say I am. STFU.

In any case, looks like I got this fish to jump out of the water.

[Pooh]

Who's this franxic dude trolling the hell out of you there?

[BCR]

You got burned by being late to the party because of your vacation Druff. The disconnect comes from the fact that the girl's name was posted in full earlier in the process, later deleted, along with posts that had already exposed her murdering dad, education history, etc had been sanitized from the thread.

Had you been around, you would have known her name, googled her and known she was, at least to a degree, what she was claiming. I watched it go down in real time, googled her, and found the stuff she later provided. I still agree with your premise in general, that he likely is ghost writing her responses for her despite her being smart enough, and she's just another shill. I'm less sure about the other Rachel lawyer. She seems legit, and seemed to be pointed to the thread to bash him, possibly by Girah himself, as she seems to like Girah personally. That was my initial impression, but so many posts have been deleted I don't recall why.

But if you were around, you would have known the other Rachel is indeed an educated escort by all appearances that he likely met in some sordid way. It's still hokey and clearly orchestrated, and the most likely scenario is he simply found another sociopath to be co-dependent with, is using her back-story because it's interesting and she exists, but is doing the writing for her or feeding her what to write. If you're going to go full length on 2+2, you should test run it here because we like you and will fill in any blanks you may have missed because of your absence. With all the deleted posts, those that had followed it closely were ready to pounce on any error you made.

[Steve-O]

I really don't know what to think with this guy other than it doesn't seem to go very well for people that interact with him. Basically if I got a phone call from a Haseeb Qureshi I'd probably insta-hang up, light my phone on fire, drive 200 miles and throw it in a river.

[superallah]

druff. what are you doing.

[Pooh]

Can somebody post cliffs of the 100,000 word essay that was just posted on 4

[superallah]

everyone grasping at straws.

[agerow1]

At first I was agreeing with Druff about everything (all of Ophelia and Lawyer) being posted by Haseeb. But in the past few hours Haseeb has been vigilantly defending himself with seemingly very angry posts. How much money could he make selling a few extra $10 books? Is he just bored? Is he really desperate for cash? I think the only people who might have bought the book from the NVG thread exposure has to be minimal. Probably less then a hundred extra sales? A few hundred? Seems like way too much effort. I really have no opinion now. Just going to sit back and watch show. This Haseeb saga started slow but has really come into its own. Its at least 53x better then the Moneymaker vs Jason Young thread.

[Steve-O]

I'll grasp at a few straws myself, and posit they he simply likes the attention. He seems to always be overshadowed by his latest poker playing friend (Ashton Griffin, Dan Cates, Girah) so maybe this is his way of going from the second tier to the top tier.

A member here bought the book and said it was good so far, I have the sample on my kindle but I'm loath to buy it and give him money, probably will though.

[Deal]

Can somebody post cliffs of the 100,000 word essay that was just posted on 4

A bunch of people on 4 think Druff's an arrogant asshole and Druff is busy proving them correct.

[garrett]

Long story short, Haseeb Quareshi is pushing another manifestation like he did "Girah" (lol), except this time his end-game is just different. Same approach, random thread pops up on NVG, couple posts in obv Haseebs vouchers chime in, bunch of drivel follows.


The same ordeal/manifestation as his "Girah" scandal. Quareshi trying to drum up some more retarded look at me time. Instead of Jungelan/Girah now he has a semi-hooker, and some other random. Ala the "Girah" thread.

Guy is insane, possibly broke, and no one gives two fucks about what this POS actually does, other than as something new to read and laugh at him about!