Druff/Kilowatt, you are what rational people call a crackpot. Your theories are logically ****. More importantly, they are false. You and your fellow crackpots are so offensive in so many ways that I have to inject some truth and evidence into this thread.
My name is Rachel Basse.
1) My dad is indeed an ax-murderer:
http://www.sptimes.com/2006/12/29/No...its_inve.shtml
About 3 a.m. on Dec. 15, 1991, Keith Yunk and his wife of seven months, Anita, were sleeping in their Largo home just west of Taylor Park when they were attacked by an intruder wielding a knife and hatchet.
Keith, 31, who was stabbed 14 times, died within minutes. Anita, 34, suffered wounds to her throat, head and ribs, but survived. The attacker cut the couple's phone line, but Anita managed to get to a neighbor's house for help.
...
The detectives' attention quickly turned to Anita Yunk's ex-husband, Luther Basse, an Idaho firefighter.
2) I graduated in the spring of 2013 from Brandeis in Waltham, MA with a BA in math and linguistics:
I did an independent study in NSA a couple years ago...
3) I know way more math than a non-mathematician like Haseeb could pretend to know:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...7m3PhfalW3USE/
2012 Michigan REU Seminar
Speakers: Rachel Basse (Brandeis) and Claire Janke (Carnegie Mellon)
Faculty Mentor: Scott Schneider
TItle: Classifying Pairs of Hyperfinite Borel Equivalence Relations
Abstract: Let x and y be infinite sequences of natural numbers, and consider the following two equivalence relations. Say x E0 y iff x and y eventually agree, i.e., there is some j such that xi+j = yi+j. Say x Et y iff x and y can be made E0-equivalent by shifting their indices some finite amount, i.e., there are j and k such that xi+j = yi+k. We want to compare E0 and Et (and other relations) using something stronger than a homomorphism -- a reduction. A reduction is a function f from the underlying set of a relation E to the underlying set of a relation F such that x E y iff f(x) F f(y). A reduction makes F behave as if it were E and tells you that F must be at least as complicated as E. It turns out that reductions exist between E0 and Et in both directions, even if, for religious or masochistic reasons, you don’t allow yourself the axiom of choice in defining them -- and we don’t. Relations E0 and Et come from a special class that are already completely classified up to isomorphism (bijective reduction), but this information isn’t (obviously) enough to answer some interesting questions concerning them. So we have been asking when a single reduction f exists from a pair (E,F) to another pair (E’,F’) so that x E y iff f(x) E’ f(y) and also x F y iff f(x) F’ f(y). Can you always turn a pair of single reductions into a single reduction of pairs? Is there always a reduction when the relations have very nice properties? What properties will a reduction transfer from one pair to another? Is there a pair that can behave like any other pair? Our answers, let us show you them.
I wrote the above abstract. Note the em-dashes.
4) I decided to start an escort business in the Spring of 2013 after being miserable during the above research projects in the summer of 2012. People here have already written me through the email on my site and ads, and one person posted my response in this thread.
It is actually common for escorts--especially ones like me--to have no-review policies. Here is a small sample of women who I happen to know or know of:
http://daniellemori.com/terms/discretion/
You may be curious as to why I have no reviews. Reviews are arguably a simpler way to gain exposure and recognition within this veiled world. I cherish my role in providing discreet companionship and in my estimation reviews work against that. Being a private person with another life, as you do, I consider having reviews an unnecessary risk. Review boards as they exist require a level of detail that is not only invasive but also legally compromising. I don’t wish to place either you or myself in a difficult situation.
http://kellyparker.net/index.php?page=faq
Do you have any reviews?
I believe our time together is just that. Time between only you and I. I will never divulge details of our fun, and I expect the same discretion from you. I understand that reviews are very popular, and I have no problem with them per se-but it’s not how I choose to promote myself. Please note: if you are someone who is a frequent poster on any of the many review boards, I would kindly request that you contact another companion to spend your valuable time with.
http://www.thebohemiancourtesan.com/#!faq/c1b47
Do you have any reviews?
Nope!
1) For reasons of my own personal moral code, and taste, I have a "no review" policy. I find a man who comes to his own conclusions and decisions wildly attractive. For those I want to attract, I have a laboriously self crafted website, a thoughtful blog (with candids), picture verification and a curious twitter account. The quality of the experience I offer and my sincerity will no doubt be reflected in the way in which I have lovingly crafted my presentation.
2) I give you my word as a professional with a reputation that I care to protect: Though I operate sans reviews, I have gone to great lengths to accurately represent myself through my website, blog, and pictures. However, in the event that you decide within the first 15 minutes of our date that you don't want to move forward, politely let me know and I will return your patronage minus any travel or arrangement expenses. I will be utterly gracious, thank you for your time, and we will part; hassle free.
I should probably say that this has yet to happen, believe it or not. But think about it....if I was some sort of ripoff artist, surely there would be word about it somewhere? Use your noggin!
http://yourjourneyintobliss.com/etiquette.php
Review Policy
I consider our time together as special and unique to us, and as such, the details of which have no place on sites that include graphic descriptions of intimate encounters and standardized ratings. My service is not geared to those who select providers on the basis of reviews, forums or discussion boards on public sites. Your privacy is of the utmost importance to me- I will always respect it and I ask that you respect mine and ours by honoring my NO review policy. I approach every session with integrity, consideration and discretion and have always had the good fortune of meeting those who value these qualities in me.
5) Rachel = Ophelia = the person who has been posting on this account.
Here are non-escort pictures of me:
https://plus.google.com/100454055463007547113/posts
http://www.okcupid.com/profile/iwasafraid
I edited in a reference in the above profile. CTRL+F "NVGer". Also, note the many references to Shakespeare and Hamlet and the tattoo of a quote from Hamlet on the back of my neck.
I altered my math.stackexchange profile and my escort website to reference this thread:
Quote:
http://math.stackexchange.com/users/21701/rachel
email
meetophelia@gmail.com
real name Rachel Basse, of NVG
I am credited in Haseeb's book as Rachel for helping him edit it and taking his pictures. I took the pictures in Austin in November, the same time that others have pointed out that Ophelia was there.
If you still think Haseeb is controlling this account, you'll have to argue that (a) he created BOTH Rachel and Ophelia fake identities many years ago, or (b) he just outed this real-life escort or falsely linked her with this real-life math woman. If you think (b) is the case, send emails to Rachel and Ophelia and post the responses you get.
Also, people can get email notifications when someone posts in their subscribed threads and hence know when new posts are made. And discussions work by taking turns. It's expected that people who are having a discussion with each other don't all post at the same time. That would not work. Trust me--I have a degree in this ****.
I am who I say I am. STFU.