Kings shot amazing in the first half draining a bunch of threes otherwise Detroit would have blown them out.Originally Posted by verminaard
Kings shot amazing in the first half draining a bunch of threes otherwise Detroit would have blown them out.
5-2 today.
How'd you do Verminaard?
Good luck tomorrow.
I should stay away from NFL but the Eagles vs Osweiller should be funny. We will see.
Sac under lost by 13.
Chicago almost screwed me in OT but was nice enough to lose by 6, instead of 8, with a basket at the 6 second mark. I deserved to win that anyway.
To early to tell. I still have 8 games outstanding. Not looking good. I think I am probably looking at a fairly significant loss overall.
If I sheeped you that would have been brutal. Cause I would have had +5.5 and lost. I think I will let you do your thing and not sheep you anymore. Probably the best for both of us.
I had a Miami O9 win future I made before the season started. Miami is going to go 11-0 and my bet is going to be voided because they missed a game due to a hurricane. 3rd time this has happened to me in the last 2 years.
USC has 2nd and goal at the 2 and Darnold throws an INT. Seriously, WTF? Horrible play call, and horrible play. Fire everyone.
I also have ga tech and ga state. But my easy losers didn't miss a game of course.
NFL:
Denver +8 -125 (Bovada line at the moment)
Tampa +7 -115
LA Rams Under 42 -105
Had USC -6. They were up 28-6 but are really pooping the bed now. I can definitely see them losing this. Did a live bet Az +8.5 -140. So 7-8 point middle, but I wouldn't be surprised if USC loses this outright.
NFL plays so far:
Teaser:
Eagles -2.5
Seahawks -1
Bucs +7 -110
Ravens +3.5
Giants +4.5
Cowboys -2.5
Bengals +6
Haha..nice
MOBILE - FOOTBALL - NFL - 452 PHILADELPHIA EAGLES -½ +105 FOR GAME
MOBILE - FOOTBALL - NFL - 468 SEATTLE SEAHAWKS -½ -104 FOR GAME
TYPE
RISK
TO WIN
TEASER
$100.80
$72.00
Was gonna add the Saints but didnt want to push it
Trying something new.
Betting UNDER in every morning game. Just seems like a week for low scoring games.
YOLO.
NFL a steaming pile this week.Haha..nice
MOBILE - FOOTBALL - NFL - 452 PHILADELPHIA EAGLES -½ +105 FOR GAME
MOBILE - FOOTBALL - NFL - 468 SEATTLE SEAHAWKS -½ -104 FOR GAME
TYPE
RISK
TO WIN
TEASER
$100.80
$72.00
Was gonna add the Saints but didnt want to push it
Where is badguy? Druff should use this time tuning up his snowblower or raking leaves instead
MOBILE - FOOTBALL - NFL - 452 PHILADELPHIA EAGLES -7 -102 FOR GAME
I won't see 6.5 ...but if I do we will reinvest.
I understand the quasi sharp narrative that this is a Broncos must win. I understand the public overvaluing a hot team. I see the bye coming up for Philly. This is easy second level stuff.
Look at Broncos dismal record against the spread. Then look at Philly. Yes sir.
There is some narrative questioning if Osweiller is in for just one week - such is the confidence in this bum. Body from god and a brain from Mattel. Imagine looking across the huddle and seeing Osweiller. Yup, you know your fucked.
God, Osweiller was fun with the Texans. Good times.
The under is your first reaction. Everyone else too. I'm off that. Spotting 7 in a low scoring game isn't correct - I'll admit that. That's why sides are hard but I have too much hate to be on the sideline here
May do something later with my Philly profit.
GL.
Broncos vs. Eagles over 41
Broncos +274
I wonder how many simulations it would take before North Dakota and Montana had NFL quarterbacks playing against each other again.
I'm with you on the Broncos. Not sure if they'll cover, but yeah, I think they'll play it far tighter than some Eagles fans are expecting.
NBA
Cleveland Over 221 -115
Might post some later games in a few hours.
Tried to get a teaser on bengals and saints considering fournette is out but too late
lol. I am on pace to go 0-10 I think.
Rams scored a TD on 3rd and 34.
Who calls the plays for Denver? And who made the decision not to challenge that no catch? Maybe the worst no challenge I've ever seen.
Bortles is shredding cincy
HILLARY WON
There are currently 12 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 11 guests)
Reply With Quote
