Weren’t unders roughly 44-22?
I would like an explanation before I stuck my finger in the over socket.
Bets for August 30- Sept 5 (Week 6)
Settled. All Lost
PGA Tour Championship (Bonus Strokes Applied) - $1600 on Jon Rahm +400 (Caesars)
Euro Italian Open - $400 B Wiesberger +2200 (MGM)
Parlay of Both - $100 +10250 (MGM) * Note payoff is less b/c Rahm is +350 but only site allows me to parlay.
Parlay Rahm w/strokes +350 with C Bezioudenhout Korn Ferry Champ +1800 (MGM) - $180 at +8450
Start $50,000 Remaining $44,020 Current Week $0 Last Week -$2,280
Total Win/Loss -$5,980
覧覧覧覧覧覧-
It sucks.
sports betting python
https://www.indeed.com/jobs?q=Sports...7fa861b0b05363
AI & Machine Learning Data Scientist ….
I’ve described my AI vision before. If I was crooked I would AI/Mach Learn my online casino for customer behavior.
I feel like the doctor gave me a cancer diagnosis. I knew the Golden Age was in its Golden Years.
I suck at chess and I can’t paint watercolors
Not much time left this season, but I have found that average-ish AL teams playing at home in interleague games have way outperformed the line in the last 15 years. There were a few dud years in there, but most years this printed money.
Indeed, this year, if you take out the Yakees, Rays, White Sox, Red Sox, and Astros (good), as well as the Orioles and Rangers (bad), you have a very good interleague record, especially at home.
Weekend results:
OU - Tulane OU spread, loss
Texas - Louisiana second half over, win
FSU - ND over win
Clemson straight up, loss
Ole - Louisville under win
Normally when you win 3 and lose two its a nice weekend, but I got crushed on OU.
I am not probably betting any more college until the virus cools off, too many players all of a sudden not playing day of game. The way OU played they might have had 5 starters out.
Genessee Ale Bowl
Boston College @ UMass
Boston College -36ス -115
Opened 38
Boston College/Massachusetts under 59 -110
BC has a 99.3% vax rate tgull
Co-sign?
Smash the under?
Last edited by Sanlmar; 09-07-2021 at 07:39 AM.
In football, what痴 better value:
+2.5 point spread at +100, or
+3 point spread at -110
?
Sorry about the long winded rep but great job with UFC. I do think there are times in Football when the spread is around 3 where it makes sense, as long as what you are laying is not ridiculous. In this case laying normal juice at +3 would be my guess is the proper play.
Football is not my specialty so Daly may rip my ass open here, but I do think in this particular situation I am correct. There technically would be more value at +100 but I don’t think that half a point is worth it in this exact scenario.
Give me Noren for the Euro BMW with a splash of Horsfield
All I am doing this week is betting Horsfield. A lot of top guys from the Euro Tour, good players who underperformed in the playoffs in the US and some nice long shots in the field. Hovland may very well win but not if he misses greens. Can’t take him at the price. Hatton last big win was this tournament last year. But he is in his worst form in years. Alot of money and R2D points.
I can make a lot of cases for a lot of guys here. Instead I am just taking a punt on Horsfield. I got him $800 at 66-1 and he quickly moved to 50-1. I think you can probably find him at 60-1 or better in some places.
That will be the only play this week. I’ll update the ledger later. It’s a major gamble and that’s why his odds are what they are. Not jumping off the horse at this price in a field that is really tough to narrow down when you start looking elsewhere.
I’ll cover Noren as well because of the big guy. Not for 8 bills but he’ll be covered.
Here's two coming up very soon:
Cleveland (Civale) vs. Minnesota (Gant) - Over 10.5 -105
Pittsburgh (D. Peters) -109 vs. Detroit (W. Peralta)
Just wanna mention that if you have a Disney + account for your kid, you probably have ESPN+ also. Just use your Disney login.
All this time I didn't realize this, and feel like a moron.
There are currently 17 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 17 guests)