Atlanta won by 2, and that ended up the difference for me.Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Chicago won by 6.
Pittsburgh under looked good through 3, then fell apart.
Considered Baltimore, decided to skip it, now I regret skipping it.
Atlanta won by 2, and that ended up the difference for me.
Chicago won by 6.
Pittsburgh under looked good through 3, then fell apart.
Considered Baltimore, decided to skip it, now I regret skipping it.
Will be a high number but I expect a split today in the Braves/Mets doubleheader so whomever wins Game 1 will “throw” Game 2 to rest up for Tuesdays start of the playoffs.
Not a good spot for the Diamondbacks to be in waiting on a sweep.
DBacks to make playoffs NO -235 is a wonderful chalk piece. ATL & Mets definitely splitting the double header. Each only needs one game to get in and then it’s time to conserve resources and concede the other game.
Then do a Jameson Williams receiving yard alt prop for even money perhaps. I have low aspirations in my life.
Braves (Sale) -465…….way too rich for my blood.
MNF
Miami -2.5 -115 vs Tennessee
Miami/Tenn - Under 38 -110
seahawks +4.5
Also if you feeling frisky I found a +1000 on Metcalf first TD
Pollard fucks Druff…..news at 11
A smooth trouble free ✅
Jameson Williams smashed the 40 prop with 80 yards. The Mets Braves affair was nothing short of collusion but it was out in the open.
Why can’t we have stuff like this on the regular? Sure I left Williams money on the counter but I’m not an NFL guy and I’m a nit.
+137
If you aren’t hitting Michael King and Padres vs ATL with Ian Anderson on flute and jet lagged bullpen then you really shouldn’t be in this thread
seahawks did everything they could to lose that game
The end of that game was fucking ridiculous.Pollard fucks Druff…..news at 11
A fucking safety.... then a shitty punt by Miami followed by "unsportsmanlike conduct", putting the ball right back in the red zone for Tenn.
Then with seconds left, a pointless touchdown scored.
Someone must have bet the over in that group.
3 of 4 dogs won yesterday. Anyone expecting more of the same or a bounce back by the “favorites”?
In all 3 of these games I would argue the visitor/dog has the better starting pitcher today. I’m riding all 3 again.
Tigers +151
Royals +130
Mets Even
i like the astros to bounce back today but im not laying -180 on them
I think this is all technically correct. It comes down to courage.
I’m sorry but I love a parlay of Mets TT o2.5(alt) & Braves/Padres u8 for +108.
I really wanna target/capitalize Tigers Tyler Holton opening somehow. Tigers F3 ML +135
GL
As Meatloaf said….2 out of 3 ain’t bad. Especially with dogs.
Brewers around -135 today, I’m sitting this one out.
But I’m taking the Bucs at the new +2 line.
Also playing Mike Evans under 60.5 receiving, he’s not 100%. But one long pass and I’m Elvis Patterson.
So 85% of the bets and 44% of the money is on Falcons?
Why books make money case #3472
If one thinks a run will be scored in the first inning you can get +120 OR you can get either +130 or +165 by betting both teams. But we know most people would just bet the +120 and not think it through.
bucs +2.5
brewers -130
brutal night
When you lose say little
When you win say less
Others should look at those two games and think twice before crying. Savagery
You deserve a medal
There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 10 guests)
Reply With Quote