I'm assuming it's because Lock is late paying for their ads in the Lock support forum. Not a good sign for those with money on Lock.
I'm assuming it's because Lock is late paying for their ads in the Lock support forum. Not a good sign for those with money on Lock.
I'm probably risking my newfound 2+2 "freedom" by posting this, but I have been very disappointed lately with their policies regarding advertising by shady poker sites.Originally Posted by BuSTMeANuT
Lock's banners and forum should have been removed from 2+2 back when they mishandled the whole Girah scandal, and it DEFINITELY should have come down when they cheated everyone on their Casino Bonus promotion in 2011-2012.
And it REALLY, REALLY, REALLY should have come down when Lock was having obvious cashout issues that went far beyond typical US payment processor problems.
You're probably right -- it's likely that they just didn't pay 2+2 for their ads, and that's what killed the ads. Pretty selfish.
I agree that the banners should have been removed much earlier but the subforum not so much.
Why? Because when you clicked it you could read about the most problems Lock had/has, at least enough negative threads that make you dont want to deposit and play there.
I wonder more why Lock doesnt ask 2p2 to nuke it. It definitely paints a very negativ and true picture of Lock.
Last edited by pavoe; 04-09-2013 at 04:28 AM.
Well I guess Lock paid their past due bill. Banners are back.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote