Reversible male birth control that lasts for 10 years?!

[Dan Druff]

Sounds kinda painful, though, even if it's under local anesthetic.

http://techcitement.com/culture/the-...n/#.T3EwYGEgeK

Not even sure if this is real, or if it's some bullshit internet hoax to get idiots sharing it on Facebook. If it is, I just fell for it.

[NaturalBornHustler]

1. That is absolutely not a level. It doesn't sound that painful, and while I have no experience I would think the scrotum is totally different than your dick when it come to sensitivity to pain. Allthey would be messing with is loose skin.

2. There have been stories for the past couple years that have said a male birth control pill exists(tried, tested ready to go), but of course won't be on the market for quite some time due to worthless government holding up the process with all their bullshit.

3. I will be first in line when either of said methods is readily available in the US.

[Vwls]

This is awesome IMO. It's really so overdue, as birth control has always been for women, and it's just not fair placing the onus on the female every damn time. This sounds much better than a vasectomy. I hope to God they don't find anything about this that makes it unsafe - this is so needed.

[Muck Ficon]

I heard about a similar procedure (or maybe the same one) years ago. I think they were experimenting with it in China on animals.

[408Mike]

I call bullshit. Won't dig deeply but from my understanding of cellular metabolism there is no way this stuff will just sit in place for ten freaking years. No way! All without ANY side effects of any kind? And just some water and NAOH and we're good- in two to three months whaaa?

Sorry charlie sounds legit but I think its bunk. Also druff if you're worried a few hundred mgs of nandrolone every month will decrease sperm production by 80% at least, is cheap and relatively side effect free. Not fool proof but good enough to have been a legal contraceptive in Australia for some time now.

[smithbk]

Long story short, I finally realized I had a relative insensitivity to the usual local anesthetics (Novocaine, Lidocaine) during my "key-hole" vasectomy. It doesn't completely work for me, and I just thought dental fillings were supposed to hurt a little, you know. Doc said "Sorry, there's nothing else I can do. It's mostly working, because otherwise you'd be trying to kill me."

[SrslySirius]

Grunching here, but I've heard of this as well and I believe it's been used in India for quite a long time and proven effective. I doubt we'll be seeing it in the USA any time soon, though.

[BeerAndPoker]

Sorry but no thanks the girl better take her pill and around the same time every day.

[SrslySirius]

Sorry but no thanks the girl better take her pill and around the same time every day.

Great plan. Just hope that she doesn't "forget" to take it.

[Muck Ficon]

This is awesome IMO. It's really so overdue, as birth control has always been for women, and it's just not fair placing the onus on the female every damn time. This sounds much better than a vasectomy. I hope to God they don't find anything about this that makes it unsafe - this is so needed.

Your pussy, your problem.

[Beebs9Dizzle]

This is awesome IMO. It's really so overdue, as birth control has always been for women, and it's just not fair placing the onus on the female every damn time. This sounds much better than a vasectomy. I hope to God they don't find anything about this that makes it unsafe - this is so needed.

Your pussy, your problem.

ROFL Your dick, your problem too.

[4Dragons]

And here I thought this was going to be some legal way that libs had found to abort children up to 10 years of age.

[verbatim]

[Walter Sobchak]

And here I thought this was going to be some legal way that libs had found to abort children up to 10 years of age.

You're making a case for most massive faggot on the
board.

[verbatim]

This is awesome IMO. It's really so overdue, as birth control has always been for women, and it's just not fair placing the onus on the female every damn time. This sounds much better than a vasectomy. I hope to God they don't find anything about this that makes it unsafe - this is so needed.

I think the reverse argument would be that women shouldnt be able to stake claim to children once they are born then. How come right now regardless of the biological fathers situation the woman is considered to be the best caregiver for a newborn child? That isnt always the case, but everyone KNOWS that the woman gets custody absent any exigent circumstances. If women want the men to bear some of the burden of responsibility pre-conception, they must also allow the men a fair shot to bear that burden post conception right?

[4Dragons]

And here I thought this was going to be some legal way that libs had found to abort children up to 10 years of age.

You're making a case for most massive faggot on the
board.

That would mean that you are all for the following:
http://liveactionnews.org/dr-phil-sh...-disabilities/

[Dan Druff]

This is a year-old thread, guys. But at least it has found new life.

I would not want to go through a painful procedure for male birth control, even if it's reversible.

[smithbk]

This is a year-old thread, guys.

Yeah, that's my fault. Not sure how I stumbled on to this.

[Yiddishdonk]

Sounds kinda painful, though, even if it's under local anesthetic.

http://techcitement.com/culture/the-...n/#.T3EwYGEgeK

Not even sure if this is real, or if it's some bullshit internet hoax to get idiots sharing it on Facebook. If it is, I just fell for it.

Sign me up !!!! Woot ...

No pain no gain ...