Jared Monroe aka "Not Gay Jared", longtime Steven Crowder sidekick, asks for help against "legal system abuse" by Crowder

[limitles]

Two thing that are hard to fake are being funny and being gay, ok being filthy rich it seems as well.

Chowder boy is a cruise comic if and anything and here is part two. Big man is a dick sucker who attacks his wife and is a low life cheat. PHONY
And he's a republican

[Dan Druff]

Matt Bruenig has filed charges against Louder with Crowder with the National Labor Relations Board https://www.nlrbedge.com/p/i-have-fi...labor-practice

The charges claim Louder with Crowder violate these unfair labor practices:
* Maintaining an illegal confidentiality rule in an employment agreement.
* Maintaining an illegal confidentiality rule in a separation agreement.
* Maintaining an illegal non-disparagement rule in a separation agreement.
* Engaging in unlawful interrogation and surveillance by seeking to obtain information about protected activity using the tools of judicial discovery.
* Sending legal threats instructing Jared to not engage in protected activity.
* Filing a baseless, retaliatory lawsuit that seeks the illegal objective of enforcing illegal confidentiality and non-disparagement rules.

If these charges prevail, all former employees will be released from their NDAs and LwC would have to reimburse Jared for all legal expenses.

I saw this. Very interesting.

This was in response to Crowder filing an actual lawsuit against Jared on March 27.

Jared winning this complaint is not automatic. I am no expert in separation agreement law, but my understanding is that this will come down to whether or not Jared was coerced into signing a restrictive separation agreement upon leaving.

If it can be shown that Jared did not sufficiently gain from giving up various rights via the agreement, and that it was likely signed out of fear of frivolous litigation, it is likely they will rule for Jared. If you recall, Jared's story is that he signed it because they were willing to do a carveout for a media job he was offered, which otherwise would not be competing with Louder with Crowder. If that's true, Jared will probably prevail here, as simply promising not to sue him for taking another job is not enough consideration on Jared's side for making him sign a restrictive agreement. Additionally, if they violated their own agreement by threatening his new company anyway, that's another way he can get the ruling in his favor.

How could the ruling go against Jared? If he accepted a substantial severance package not previously offered, but available in exchange for the agreement, he would likely lose here. If his original terms of employment came with a restrictive agreement, he might also lose this.

Not sure how long it takes to rule on these.

[Dan Druff]

Some guy on Twitter made this, and it was well received and shared, and then deleted.

But I grabbed it before that happened.

[DrSayre]

lol I wonder why it was deleted

[DrSayre]

The latest deep dive on the Crowder/Monroe situation

[NickyPipes]

Simple question why’d he sign the contract on the way out?

[Dan Druff]

Simple question why’d he sign the contract on the way out?

That's the question we all want answered.

Here's perhaps a hint:

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/ToddWitteles/status/1775606185997332822

[DrSayre]

Simple question why’d he sign the contract on the way out?

From Jared's video, I think he said his initial employer contract was interpreted as a non-compete clause for 2 years after he leaves Louder with Crowder. So as a compromise, they came to an agreement that Jared could work at a specific company. But after he started with that company, Louder with Crowder sent a cease and desist letter, and that company let Jared go. It looks like Quieter with Crowder found tweets that strongly suggest that company was CRTV (now Blaze TV).. which makes sense, because at the time Steven Crowder was probably CRTV's biggest personality, so they probably didnt want to upset Crowder.

[Dan Druff]

Update:

The first lawsuit against Jared (for violating the NDA) has been dropped.

There is now a second lawsuit for defamation.

Here is Jared's lawyer's take on it: https://www.nlrbedge.com/p/update-on...-crowder-legal


I mostly agree with Jared's lawyer. This defamation suit looks about as meritorious as Postle's defamation suit against me.

In fact, this could be even worse, because it appears Crowder's suit hinges around defamatory text messages which were shared to the public by Crowder's own CEO, Gerald Morgan Jr!

So how can Crowder be suing about defamatory private texts between his ex-wife and Jared, shared with the public, when the person sharing them was Crowder's CEO?

Bizarre.

Here's a link to the complaint. Looks extremely frivolous: https://www.nlrbedge.com/api/v1/file...3628184fb4.pdf


Texas also has its own version of anti-SLAPP legislation, making this sort of case even more difficult to win (or even drag on for awhile). Additionally, Crowder is clearly a public figure, making a defamation case win nearly impossible.


One interesting factor here? Crowder has retained law firm Platt Richmond for this case. Recognize the Richmond part? That's Bill Richmond, Crowder's "half Asian lawyer", who was a longtime part of the show, then abruptly disappeared and seemed to have cut ties with Crowder, at least publicly.

I had long thought that Richmond had received a piece of Louder With Crowder in exchange for his ongoing legal work, and then had a falling out with Crowder, thus leaving the two "stuck" together.

But now I'm getting away from that belief. Otherwise, why would Crowder hire Richmond's firm for this? I suppose it's possible that Richmond's firm is doing this work for free or very cheap, due to Richmond's (likely) ownership in Louder With Crowder. Richmond himself is not one of the listed lawyers on the case, but he was seen at one of Crowder's divorce proceedings, so clearly there's an ongoing legal relationship at minimum.