Originally Posted by NickyPipes
no nothing at all weird about a grown man with a little girly voice trying to meet up and have lunch with other random dudes from the internet to prove their ‘net worth’
4BET why has he been trying to ‘meet you for years’
whats the backstory here ?
please tell me you didn’t exchange dick pics
No backstory, He was referring to Cerveza
no nothing at all weird about a grown man with a little girly voice trying to meet up and have lunch with other random dudes from the internet to prove their ‘net worth’
4BET why has he been trying to ‘meet you for years’
whats the backstory here ?
please tell me you didn’t exchange dick pics
He is on super tilt because people on the internet don’t believe he is worth millions lol
Agree he did sound like he had a dick in his ass when he called into radio
-Allergic to the struggle
Ok Im in
STRAIGHT BET
Ticket# Date Placed Risk Win
Aug 31
04:31 PM [188] TCU -20½-110
550 500
TCU team total over 41.5 -122 (FD)
]]I missed this one. This is actually easy. Another grand. Thanks for the reminder.
I asked a professional handicapper I know that specializes in college football about Colorado/TCU. This guy is good. He scores high in the contests every year. Here's what he had to say:
"Impossible to play. TCU was stripped on offense and was likely overrated last year. This year's QB, however, was originally supposed to start all games until dinged, when Duggan, the previous two-year starter, regained his job. Colorado is completely revamped in terms of personnel, which is a plus (I guess), but really -- importing SWAC players is more mirage than boon. The TCU defense should shut them down, which leads to trying to anticipate when the substitutes come in...for both teams. There is a (strong) possibility TCU blasts their first three opponents by pinball scores. In fact, there is a chance they rampage through everybody until the @Texas Tech.
The great unknown is the rule changes, which -- due to the clock running -- are allegedly going to hack six to seven plays apiece off each team. Number one -- that's a lot of missing plays. Two -- those are formal estimates. My own reviewing of the process opening week strongly suggests more plays will be missing than formally projected.
So with all of these monster lines this week -- very, very tough to figure the effects of surgically removing all of these plays. I have my own suspicions about which brackets of spreads will be affected the most.
Hint: if you're not up on the rule changes and effects, take the college season off, because you do not know what you are doing.
Summary -- and the reason I share this is I'm not betting the game -- if you put a gun to my head, I take TCU. I think Colorado's offensive line is probably overmatched. They are going to have a hard time. The key question will be an inexperienced TCU offensive line against a jumbled together front seven on defense for Colorado. Unknown what that will look like. Always hard to lay 20 opening week with a brand new offensive line. Some pundits are famously predicting TCU to hang a "half a hundred" on Colorado. Personally, I think it more likely that they shut Colorado down and have the QB running for his life all day, but if TCU goes bang-bang-bang first three or four possessions, yeah, the game could get out of hand and pinball-ish.
I have to make forced choice decisions on this game for the Northbet contest anyway, so people will see who I took after the fact. Likely TCU, even though they are not nearly as good as last year's squad, which was not as good as they appeared."
POKER FAG ALERT! FOR BLOW JOB SEE SLOPPY JOE THE TRANNIE HO.
This is a good take, with the exception of the fact Colorado has only 9 scholarship players returning. There is no way they will have any cohesion on either the Offensive Line or Defensive Line. It's also going to be 100 degrees Saturday afternoon. Colorado and that stupid fucking Cowboy hat Deion is wearing is going to get blown the fuck into the stands. This one is about as easy as easy gets. Look for TCU to run an even par on the Buffs.
Anyone who thinks 7-9 plays a team will be stripped away due to the rule changes has no idea what they are talking about
It’s astounding that the fraud of all frauds on a fraud alert forum calls someone else outthis is of course untrue
I have however called you repeatedly out for….
making false claims about your phony vacations to western Australia and other exotic destinations
creating countless dupe accounts
spotlighting your ridiculous multiple personality disorder and chronic alcoholism
starting new threads about large bets which you never made
etc etc etc
—-
I have no desire whatsoever (now or ever) to ‘obtain your personal information’ and the extent of our private communications over the span of at least a decade has been virtually nonexistent
listen and listen good whatever your name is…
its very simple
you produce ANY valid and/or verified form of proof that you placed a $3000.00 bet on TCU vs Colorado, and I will publicly apologize for questioning your claim in a YouTube video as well as a public written statement
nobody gives a fuck about your personal information, address, name or family
I just happen to think you are essentially a cartoon character who craves attention and accolades for shit he didn’t do, trips you never took, dinners you never ate, and now bets you never placed
now print that out…
take it to your fake attorney…
and shove it straight up both your asses
Jewdonk is the liar
Jewdonk has never produced a single piece of evidence
to counter the claim that he was released from a mental institution in the Reagan years.
Picking college games early in the season ain’t easy. Absolutely no frame of reference. Better to refrain until they get a few games under their belts. Not saying TCU is a bad bet though. I certainly wouldn’t take the Buffs!
Well disagree. You get plenty of upsets late in the year. Early in the year is actually where you find value, usually returning starters. Then injuries hit, but the first three or four games are usually what team has the most returning starters, then teams on the fringe start to rise.
Another brilliant insight from a pos lawyer
Anyone making money on sports betting is not posting here.
Tgull is brilliant for the fact he gets this whole thing and is playing with those who take it seriously
Also betting on sports is like putting down 5 bucks a week in lotto and just waiting for the windfall
Ask yourself. If someone believes a random Internet forum poster
do they also believe in Bigfoot?
Its not easy unless you are very well read and understand all the ins and outs of player movement.
Knowing the OC’s and the impact to totals are super important. This guy running the ship went to Iowa the total would go from 39 to 79 by week 3, as an example
Here's the new rule.
What is changing in college football?
Stopping and starting the clock
Previously in college football, the game clock was stopped when the offense gained a first down. This rule has been changed for the 2023 season, and the clock will stop on an offensive first down only in the final two minutes of each half.Aug 14, 2023
POKER FAG ALERT! FOR BLOW JOB SEE SLOPPY JOE THE TRANNIE HO.
He didn't say 7 to 9 plays apiece. He said the new rule will "allegedly hack six to seven plays apiece off each team." But he thinks that estimate is probably to low.
The rules committee believes the new rule will lower the average number of plays, 180, to 172.
This is a statistic that's going to manifest itself in just a few weeks so we will get to see who had the best estimate.
POKER FAG ALERT! FOR BLOW JOB SEE SLOPPY JOE THE TRANNIE HO.
DO as mickey says guys
the man has never had a losing week in 27 years as a professional gambler
"Professional gambler" is an oxymoron.
POKER FAG ALERT! FOR BLOW JOB SEE SLOPPY JOE THE TRANNIE HO.
My eyes are bleeding re reading that.
He didn't say 7 to 9 plays apiece. He said the new rule will "allegedly hack six to seven plays apiece off each team." But he thinks that estimate is probably to low.
The rules committee believes the new rule will lower the average number of plays, 180, to 172.
This is a statistic that's going to manifest itself in just a few weeks so we will get to see who had the best estimate.
I think what you or your pal is trying to say that total plays will drop 6-8 total. I think thats a tick high but its a far cry from 12-16 total which would be absurd.
Its going to be referee dependent and situation dependent. Some refs/crews would take 8-10 seconds to set the ball. Ive seen some Big 12 crews in these 77-70 shoutouts not stop the clock at all, so no change to the new rule.
It will impact total plays differently depending on the conference.
OK"Professional gambler" is an oxymoron.
Mick has been gambling weekly for 27 years and has never had a losing week
1404 weeks straight without ever losing one of those weeks
Impressive stuff mick
Hey Gringo, YOU are the BITCH. All I ever did was call you out way back for being full of shit. I don't have any anger or hatred towards you. I just call out bullshit when I see it.
I don't have the need, the desire, nor the time to meet you. Get over it.
En boca cerrada, no entran moscas
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote