*****OFFICIAL SCIENCE THREAD****

[limitles]

From my understanding science is a profession based on observations and recording changes therein under strict conditions

This endeavour must also qualify all data via the scientific method, an elaborate process rest assured.

If you are distrustful of information originating from a scientific source consider the above.

[Cerveza Fria]

From my understanding science is a profession based on observations and recording changes therein under strict conditions

This endeavour must also qualify all data via the scientific method, an elaborate process rest assured.

If you are distrustful of information originating from a scientific source consider the above.

Scientifically speaking...you're an idiot. The data reviewed to reach this conclusion is comprised of your posts in this forum.

[limitles]

From my understanding science is a profession based on observations and recording changes therein under strict conditions

This endeavour must also qualify all data via the scientific method, an elaborate process rest assured.

If you are distrustful of information originating from a scientific source consider the above.

Scientifically speaking...you're an idiot. The data reviewed to reach this conclusion is comprised of your posts in this forum.

Herein lies the idea for this thread.
The geniuses of science is based on objective change. Recorded data and experimental results are literally a record of change. So the only option to dispute recorded data is to repeat the process and submit those results for review.

My opinion and yours are baseless compared to these standards.

[dwai]

the science in action!

[devidee]

[Entropy]

The JWST is causing problems for the beloved big bang theory.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/techn...ed/ar-AA10SJTD
Many scientists have been studying these new images and determining evidence that has stood for many years. The big bang theory essentially states that the universe began some 14 billion years ago in an incredibly hot and dense state that has been expanding ever since. However, the characteristics of the galaxies that are furthest away should be huge and contain a “red shirt” to their light. What the James Webb Telescope has discovered is that those galaxies are the complete opposite.

The new evidence would debunk the Big Bang Theory in a big way, as the initial idea is the universe exploded into existence and began to expand. In fact, it should be ever-expanding. But the new galaxies found are said to be older than when the Big Bang was said to have initially occurred. The young stars in those far galaxies should be hot and blue in color, as most young stars are. However, the stars being discovered are all cooler and reddish in color, indicating they are older than when the Big Bang would have occurred. Naturally, these new findings would have a massive impact on the scientific community. The Big Bang Theory being debunked would result in years of research being useless, in a sense. More importantly, the religious community that has believed that a singular god created the universe and accompanying stars would have some much better ground to stand on.

I wouldn't call it debunked just yet.