At 4:34:15 he says he doesn’t listen to podcasts then says he does listen to PFA.
At 4:43:50 he says some people don’t like Todd (lol).
At 4:34:15 he says he doesn’t listen to podcasts then says he does listen to PFA.
At 4:43:50 he says some people don’t like Todd (lol).
You keep hearing a lot of these guys who came in around the boom do listen to PFA. I think the deep dive into the topics that Druff does appeals to alot of players who came in or were around then. The story telling is more appreciated. I think the younger generation have shorter attention spans, rather talk about solvers and saving the spotted owl. Druff gets plenty of material from them at least.
Despite both of us being in poker a long time, I got to know Jonathan only semi-recently when I discovered our mutual dislike of Mason Malmuth. Sometime shortly after that he started listening to PFA Radio (without even telling me), and I only realized it when he DM'd me about something I had talked about.
I didn't know that PFA is the only show he listens to. Nice to hear that.
While most of the PFA audience consists of recreational players, there are some known pros who listen, as well as a number of lesser known pros. Ari Engel listens to every episode, as does recent million dollar winner Matt Glantz. Bart Hanson is another regular listener.
The show's length puts off a lot of potential listeners, but the timestamps have helped somewhat negate that. People do like how I will go into detailed discussion about a lot of topics, and that I won't shy away from controversial or politically incorrect subjects. I also am never afraid to criticize poker sites or tournament series, but at the same time, I have no agenda and will also defend them if warranted.
Little is really the only guy I follow on YouTube for poker strategy. The only negative is that all of his co hosts look like idiots compared to him.
Speak to the topic. Do you not host a podcast that resembles no other comparing time frames?
Is your podcast focused on a particular topic, one which you may have knowledge of, or do you take liberties
with almost every word you speak?
As an example, you opine, on occasion, with regards to humour. You have no experience in this field and thus no authority to speak on
the subject but that does not stop you.
As I said, anyone, including you who rattles on for hours must be considered a fool
Fantasy world
truly fascinating and sick at the same time
Not going to fight with the owner a site but, I will not listen to a madman/fool in any format.
You think you have an audience for your podcast? Sure, there must be someone but comparing it to
the entertainment Donkdown radio provided is delusional. You were the hanger on in that production.
You were made fun of for a reason. Not saying you were not an important part of the show but
you were the least important portion.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)