Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: A woman stole $680,000 and spent it on a gambling game that doesn't pay out real money

  1. #1
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Blog Entries

    Double Down Casino and Big Fish Casino -- both free-money slot apps -- are accused of causing addicted gamblers to lose big money with no possible upside

    This is a bizarre and somewhat sad story.

    Double Down Casino and Big Fish Casino, which are run by two separate companies, both look like real-money online casino apps. But they're not. The coins you win on these casino apps have no value, and cannot be exchanged for real money.

    However, the companies are accused of using "predatory methods to target compulsive gamblers", encouraging players to buy more chips after their initial free allotment runs out.

    Amazingly, despite there being zero upside to winning on these "casino" apps, some people have spent as much as $400,000 buying play-money chips to keep playing, and they describe their need to do so in the same way compulsive gamblers behave.

    In March, a $155 million settlement was reached with Big Fish in a class action lawsuit.

    Presently, there are also lawsuits against Double Down, including one which attempts to use an old Washington law which allows all money won through illegal gambling to be refunded.

    There's also a woman who recently did an interview with NBC News, Kathleen Wilkinson. She's a grandmother from Montana, and claims she lost her "life savings" of $50,000 playing on the Double Down Casino. She's presently suing Double Down, as well.

    The legal question here is interesting.

    The attorneys suing these companies claim that these apps constitute "illegal gambling", and they claim that the chips which people purchase are considered "something of value". In the Big Fish case, this was upheld to be true. In all other cases prior to this, these arguments failed.

    The "something of value" test has to do with the three elements which define gambling:

    - Chance
    - Consideration
    - Prize

    "Chance" means that there's a random element to winning or losing, and that's not all skill-related. "Consideration" means that the player is putting up something of value to possibly lose. "Prize" means that the player receives something of value if they win.

    There's definitely "chance" and "consideration" here, as these slot machines run on a random number generator, and there's real money being spent on the chips. However, attorneys for the apps have argued that the "prize" element isn't there -- that the players only win worthless chips. However, the plaintiffs' attorneys argue that these chips DO have value, as winning on these apps gives you more of the chips which you otherwise spend money on, thus giving people a feeling that they're actually "winning" something.

    How do I feel about this? I don't agree that these apps are illegal gambling, but I do believe there needs to be massive reform involving in-app purchases, as it's a super-immature area of law, and there's tons of shady stuff going on. A good example of this was the 21 Blitz situation, which DOES more resemble a gambling game, and indeed their ads are highly misleading.

      shoeshine box: pos corp heads shd be in jail.

  2. #2

    A woman stole $680,000 and spent it on a gambling game that doesn't pay out real money

    WTF?! One would imagine that if someone stole almost a quarter of a million dollars to spend on a gambling game, some of that money would be recouped in winnings. Unfortunately for a woman in Australia, the slot machine simulator she was playing doesn't pay out in actual cash, just more of the virtual tokens that she continued to buy.

    ABC reports that Tasmania, Australia, resident Rachel Naomi Perri pleaded guilty to 25 charges of computer-related fraud and one count of fraud in court this week. Prosecutor say she made 475 fraudulent transactions while working at the Tasmanian Veterinary Hospital between 2016 and 2019, stealing a total of AUD $940,221 (USD $680,000).

    Perri used the stolen money to fund her addiction to mobile slot machine simulator Heart of Vegas Slots. The game, which has over 10 million downloads and a user rating of 4.1, recreates the Las Vegas slot machine experience, giving players the option of buying virtual coins to spend on the machines. However, these tokens cannot be turned back into real money; you just keep spending any winnings on the games.

    Heart of Vegas Slots' T&C section explains that players "may be required to pay a fee to obtain virtual items" but "regardless of the terminology used, virtual items may never be redeemed for 'real world' money."

  3. #3
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Blog Entries
    Yeah these are actual slots which get licensed to these apps, but don't operate for real money.

    Buffalo slots, one of the most popular slot games of all time, is all over these apps:

    While men overwhelmingly commit more crime than women, the crime of embezzlement from a company in order to fund gambling habits seems to be more often a female thing. This is the first one I've seen where there isn't real gambling taking place, though.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Who Says White Collar Crime Doesn't Pay?
    By GambleBotsChafedPenis in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-05-2019, 11:14 AM
  2. Goldman Sachs Senior Executive in India Stole $5.3 million To Pay Down Poker Debt
    By Shizzmoney in forum Scams, Scandals, and Shadiness
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-20-2019, 05:00 PM
  3. How much money have you spent in your life on lottery tickets?
    By NaturalBornHustler in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 12-18-2013, 06:26 PM
  4. BetSafe/Ongame stole $6,000 from me
    By BBBB in forum Scams, Scandals, and Shadiness
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-11-2013, 03:43 AM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-28-2013, 04:39 AM