Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: 4 new supreme court justices coming

  1. #1
    Flashlight Master desertrunner's Avatar
    Reputation
    100
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    3,184
    Load Metric
    67583672

    4 new supreme court justices coming

    Democrats Introducing Legislation To Pack Supreme Court With 4 New Justices, Report Says- https://www.dailywire.com/news/break...es-report-says

    My opinion- Obvious packing of the court, more dirty play.
    Last edited by desertrunner; 04-15-2021 at 02:01 PM.

  2. #2
    Silver David USF's Avatar
    Reputation
    45
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Covina, CA
    Posts
    563
    Load Metric
    67583672
    *4 new supreme court justices might be coming

     
    Comments
      
      desertrunner: You know the libtards will cheat again and pack.
      
      gimmick:

  3. #3
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10144
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,758
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    67583672
    Normally I would be annoyed that desertrunner just started a news thread, after everything that has happened this week here, but I actually meant to start this thread myself, so I'll allow it.

    I knew this was possible, but the optimistic side of me said maybe they were just posturing in 2020.

    If this is really happening, it's terrible. It will ruin the Supreme Court. It will establish a precedent where the party in power just keeps adding justices until they get the majority. The number 13 isn't random. Adding 4 justices (all D) would put the balance to 7-6 liberal, whereas right now it's 6-3 conservative.

    If RBG had retired during Obama's 2nd term, I bet Dems would be looking to increase it to 11, as they'd only need 2 more justices.

    But this won't end. If Republicans win in 2024, they will add two more justices to get it back to 8-7.

    And so on.

    Sad!

  4. #4
    Welcher jsearles22's Avatar
    Reputation
    561
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,690
    Load Metric
    67583672
    Quote Originally Posted by desertrunner View Post
    Democrats Introducing Legislation To Pack Supreme Court With 4 New Justices, Report Says- https://www.dailywire.com/news/break...es-report-says

    More info? When? How? I don’t watch the show, so don’t know anything about this.
    It's hilarious that we as a society think everyone can be a dr, a lawyer, an engineer. Some people are just fucking stupid. Why can't we just accept that?

  5. #5
    Diamond Walter Sobchak's Avatar
    Reputation
    1243
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Bowling Alley
    Posts
    8,875
    Load Metric
    67583672
    This won't happen because of the filibuster, but it should happen.

    Republicans refused to even consider Obama's nomination in February 2016, an unprecedented move, saying "the American people should choose who will nominate this Justice." Then in October 2020 they rushed Barrett onto the Court, completely abandoning what they said before.

    Fuck them. Get rid of the filibuster, pass HR 1, pack the Court, admit DC and PR as states, then we'd be closer to fairness.

    SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798

    PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL

  6. #6
    Flashlight Master desertrunner's Avatar
    Reputation
    100
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    3,184
    Load Metric
    67583672
    Quote Originally Posted by jsearles22 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by desertrunner View Post
    Democrats Introducing Legislation To Pack Supreme Court With 4 New Justices, Report Says- https://www.dailywire.com/news/break...es-report-says

    More info? When? How? I don’t watch the show, so don’t know anything about this.
    A link was provided for you to click on and get info.

  7. #7
    Flashlight Master desertrunner's Avatar
    Reputation
    100
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    3,184
    Load Metric
    67583672
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak View Post
    This won't happen because of the filibuster, but it should happen.
    Why exactly should it happen? What specific deficienies are happening in the SCOTUS right now where the Justices are indicating this needs to happen? Are they over worked, can not take on more cases? Or want to take on more cases so they need more justices? Are they talking to each other and saying- "We need more justices here"? Did they contact Biden and request this? Are we so behind right now that we need to add more staff?

    What specific reason(s) do we need to do this?

  8. #8
    Diamond Walter Sobchak's Avatar
    Reputation
    1243
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Bowling Alley
    Posts
    8,875
    Load Metric
    67583672
    Quote Originally Posted by desertrunner View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak View Post
    This won't happen because of the filibuster, but it should happen.
    Why exactly should it happen? What specific deficienies are happening in the SCOTUS right now where the Justices are indicating this needs to happen? Are they over worked, can not take on more cases? Or want to take on more cases so they need more justices? Are they talking to each other and saying- "We need more justices here"? Did they contact Biden and request this? Are we so behind right now that we need to add more staff?

    What specific reason(s) do we need to do this?
    To quote another poster, it has been posted in this thread already.

     
    Comments
      
      gimmick:

    SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798

    PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL

  9. #9
    Flashlight Master desertrunner's Avatar
    Reputation
    100
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    3,184
    Load Metric
    67583672
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak View Post

    To quote another poster, it has been posted in this thread already.
    Please quote them, I dont see it. If you cant really give specific details, then stop.

  10. #10
    Master of Props Daly's Avatar
    Reputation
    2682
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    10,336
    Load Metric
    67583672
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak View Post
    This won't happen because of the filibuster, but it should happen.

    Republicans refused to even consider Obama's nomination in February 2016, an unprecedented move, saying "the American people should choose who will nominate this Justice." Then in October 2020 they rushed Barrett onto the Court, completely abandoning what they said before.

    Fuck them. Get rid of the filibuster, pass HR 1, pack the Court, admit DC and PR as states, then we'd be closer to fairness.
    “An unprecedented move”

    Was it really? Really?

  11. #11
    Diamond Walter Sobchak's Avatar
    Reputation
    1243
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Bowling Alley
    Posts
    8,875
    Load Metric
    67583672
    Quote Originally Posted by desertrunner View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak View Post

    To quote another poster, it has been posted in this thread already.
    Please quote them, I dont see it. If you cant really give specific details, then stop.
    I was quoting you.

    SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798

    PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL

  12. #12
    Diamond dwai's Avatar
    Reputation
    1653
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    7,855
    Load Metric
    67583672
    RBG SHOULD'VE RETIRED WHEN OBAMA WAS PRESIDENT

    TRUMP WITH THE DOUBLE DIP

    LIBS MAD AF PER USUAL

  13. #13
    Silver BlunderMaker's Avatar
    Reputation
    118
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    571
    Load Metric
    67583672
    There should be 101 justices, all gay black and jewish. Then, and only then, can fairness begin to happen.

  14. #14
    Flashlight Master desertrunner's Avatar
    Reputation
    100
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    3,184
    Load Metric
    67583672
    Quote Originally Posted by dwai View Post
    RBG SHOULD'VE RETIRED WHEN OBAMA WAS PRESIDENT

    TRUMP WITH THE DOUBLE DIP

    LIBS MAD AF PER USUAL
    This guy nailed it both items.

  15. #15
    Silver
    Reputation
    152
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    659
    Load Metric
    67583672
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak View Post
    This won't happen because of the filibuster, but it should happen.

    Republicans refused to even consider Obama's nomination in February 2016, an unprecedented move, saying "the American people should choose who will nominate this Justice." Then in October 2020 they rushed Barrett onto the Court, completely abandoning what they said before.

    Fuck them. Get rid of the filibuster, pass HR 1, pack the Court, admit DC and PR as states, then we'd be closer to fairness.
    Republicans actually won a POLITICAL battle (for once), so Dems go kamikaze, try to change the rules during the game, and actively sabotage the system.

    "Fairness" my ass.

    Lying about Kavanaugh and smearing him. DISGRACEFUL way to respond to a standard political battle.

    If Republicans were trying to add justices, I'd be saying the exact same thing.

    Also, Merrick Garland is a mental midget and a terrible nominee. Glad he isn't on the court.

  16. #16
    Flashlight Master desertrunner's Avatar
    Reputation
    100
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    3,184
    Load Metric
    67583672
    Quote Originally Posted by v12cl View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak View Post
    This won't happen because of the filibuster, but it should happen.

    Republicans refused to even consider Obama's nomination in February 2016, an unprecedented move, saying "the American people should choose who will nominate this Justice." Then in October 2020 they rushed Barrett onto the Court, completely abandoning what they said before.

    Fuck them. Get rid of the filibuster, pass HR 1, pack the Court, admit DC and PR as states, then we'd be closer to fairness.
    Republicans actually won a POLITICAL battle (for once), so Dems go kamikaze, try to change the rules during the game, and actively sabotage the system.

    "Fairness" my ass.

    Lying about Kavanaugh and smearing him. DISGRACEFUL way to respond to a standard political battle.

    If Republicans were trying to add justices, I'd be saying the exact same thing.

    Also, Merrick Garland is a mental midget and a terrible nominee. Glad he isn't on the court.
    Massive nailed it.

  17. #17
    Flashlight Master desertrunner's Avatar
    Reputation
    100
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    3,184
    Load Metric
    67583672

  18. #18
    Diamond dwai's Avatar
    Reputation
    1653
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    7,855
    Load Metric
    67583672
    Quote Originally Posted by desertrunner View Post
    NANCY PELOSI IS GOD

  19. #19
    Diamond Walter Sobchak's Avatar
    Reputation
    1243
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Bowling Alley
    Posts
    8,875
    Load Metric
    67583672
    Quote Originally Posted by dwai View Post
    RBG SHOULD'VE RETIRED WHEN OBAMA WAS PRESIDENT

    TRUMP WITH THE DOUBLE DIP

    LIBS MAD AF PER USUAL
    That's for sure.

    SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798

    PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL

  20. #20
    Diamond Walter Sobchak's Avatar
    Reputation
    1243
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Bowling Alley
    Posts
    8,875
    Load Metric
    67583672
    Quote Originally Posted by BlunderMaker View Post
    There should be 101 justices, all gay black and jewish. Then, and only then, can fairness begin to happen.
    They should all be Muslim trannies.

    SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798

    PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Indian tribe owns half of Oklahoma per Supreme Court
    By cyberbabble in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-10-2020, 05:09 AM
  2. ****Official Supreme Court Justice Thread****
    By Draymond in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-10-2016, 12:22 AM
  3. Supreme Court Justice Scalia - Donkdown
    By DRK Star in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 97
    Last Post: 02-19-2016, 12:43 PM
  4. Supreme Court bans warrantless cell phone searches
    By 4Dragons in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-25-2014, 09:42 AM
  5. DeShaney vs. Winnebago - 1980's Supreme Court Case
    By Beebs9Dizzle in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-13-2013, 07:00 AM