Pentagon finally ADMITS that UFO's are REAL and that they have been testing UFO wreckage for DECADES

[nightmarefish]

UFO just means any flying object that is unidentified. A helium balloon blowing around in the wind that reflects sunlight in a way that looks weird to you on the ground could be a UFO, and has been reported as such thousands of times. A test flight by the air Force, a drone, a spy plane, a meteorite, all kinds of things.

There's no intelligent life form secretly visiting earth and accidentally dropping their amazing technology anywhere. This is just the modern equivalent of "I can't immediately explain this, it must be supernatural!" AKA religion. Please find something better to do with your time.

I know someone who essentially believes in benevolent aliens who want to give us advanced technology to save us from destroying our planet’s ecosphere but who are waiting for NASA to slowly reveal to the public that such aliens exist until the greater public is acclimated enough to the idea so that there isn’t a disruptive massively panic when learning of these aliens. Also, he estimates that the aliens will almost definitely show themselves to the greater public within 50 years, a time span that he is hoping to live long enough to witness his prediction come true.

In other words, these aliens are the science fiction version of the Messiah, but he doesn’t see it fiction, but as fact. And no amount of trying to reasonably challenge him on his interpretations of events UFO enthusiasts and hucksters claim are alien UFO sightings can get him to accept a non-alien cause for them.

You should try to reasonably challenge this guy. He’s not even saying he believes in aliens, he’s saying we (mankind) are no where close to the technology he and his team saw with their own expert eyes.

[FRANKRIZZO]

Its not out of the realm of possibility [that there were a few crashes imo. Supposedly ufos have access to worm holes. I believe there is an area 51 that has crashed wreckage of ufos and there was reverse engineering going on. Govt probably has another base then studio 54. Universe is extremely vas pretty likely there is some type of intelligence that is superior to our own.

[TheXFactor]

The material that these "UFO's" were constructed with is not found on Earth.

As for the Aliens, the typical E.T. is about 3 and half feet tall with a big head, really big eyes and may communicate telepathically.

Aliens would not be able to live on Earth.
The atmosphere and bacteria would kill them easily.

They are not interested in making contact with idiot human beings, cows are more interesting to them.

[MumblesBadly]

I know someone who essentially believes in benevolent aliens who want to give us advanced technology to save us from destroying our planet’s ecosphere but who are waiting for NASA to slowly reveal to the public that such aliens exist until the greater public is acclimated enough to the idea so that there isn’t a disruptive massively panic when learning of these aliens. Also, he estimates that the aliens will almost definitely show themselves to the greater public within 50 years, a time span that he is hoping to live long enough to witness his prediction come true.

In other words, these aliens are the science fiction version of the Messiah, but he doesn’t see it fiction, but as fact. And no amount of trying to reasonably challenge him on his interpretations of events UFO enthusiasts and hucksters claim are alien UFO sightings can get him to accept a non-alien cause for them.

You should try to reasonably challenge this guy. He’s not even saying he believes in aliens, he’s saying we (mankind) are no where close to the technology he and his team saw with their own expert eyes.

Eyewitness testimonials of a few individuals, even by folks who are well-meaning and have a yeoman’s knowledge of human technology, are woefully unreliable. That’s because the human mind is subject to creating memories of things that simply didn’t happen. But under the stress of certain circumstances, as well as chance firings of braim synapses and the human mind’s tendency to try to fill in the blanks in our perceptions where are minds expect to see something, people can come to truly believe they visually witnessed something that simply didn’t happen they way they remember it.

[nightmarefish]

You should try to reasonably challenge this guy. He’s not even saying he believes in aliens, he’s saying we (mankind) are no where close to the technology he and his team saw with their own expert eyes.

Eyewitness testimonials of a few individuals, even by folks who are well-meaning and have a yeoman’s knowledge of human technology, are woefully unreliable. That’s because the human mind is subject to creating memories of things that simply didn’t happen. But under the stress of certain circumstances, as well as chance firings of braim synapses and the human mind’s tendency to try to fill in the blanks in our perceptions where are minds expect to see something, people can come to truly believe they visually witnessed something that simply didn’t happen they way they remember it.

You watched 0.0 seconds of the interview. This was witnessed by the commander, two other pilots that were in other planes with him, and the data was recorded by the aircraft carrier they took off from. There’s video of what it looked like of radar and data on its unique characteristics. The navy had been tracking whatever it was for multiple days/weeks and made the decision to send the commander and his team to check it out up close. Seriously Watch the first part of the interview, you’re not gonna find a more credible guy for something like this. This isn’t some random drunk guy thinking he saw something strange, the Navy admits they have no clue what it was and it has technology that doesn’t currently exist.

[MumblesBadly]

Eyewitness testimonials of a few individuals, even by folks who are well-meaning and have a yeoman’s knowledge of human technology, are woefully unreliable. That’s because the human mind is subject to creating memories of things that simply didn’t happen. But under the stress of certain circumstances, as well as chance firings of braim synapses and the human mind’s tendency to try to fill in the blanks in our perceptions where are minds expect to see something, people can come to truly believe they visually witnessed something that simply didn’t happen they way they remember it.

You watched 0.0 seconds of the interview. This was witnessed by the commander, two other pilots that were in other planes with him, and the data was recorded by the aircraft carrier they took off from. There’s video of what it looked like of radar and data on its unique characteristics. The navy had been tracking whatever it was for multiple days/weeks and made the decision to send the commander and his team to check it out up close. Seriously Watch the first part of the interview, you’re not gonna find a more credible guy for something like this. This isn’t some random drunk guy thinking he saw something strange, the Navy admits they have no clue what it was and it has technology that doesn’t currently exist.

Thank you, but I’ll wait for the video and data recorded by the aircraft carrier to be independently analyzed by scientists without any self-interest in promoting the “super technology” interpretation of what was recorded.

[nightmarefish]

You watched 0.0 seconds of the interview. This was witnessed by the commander, two other pilots that were in other planes with him, and the data was recorded by the aircraft carrier they took off from. There’s video of what it looked like of radar and data on its unique characteristics. The navy had been tracking whatever it was for multiple days/weeks and made the decision to send the commander and his team to check it out up close. Seriously Watch the first part of the interview, you’re not gonna find a more credible guy for something like this. This isn’t some random drunk guy thinking he saw something strange, the Navy admits they have no clue what it was and it has technology that doesn’t currently exist.

Thank you, but I’ll wait for the video and data recorded by the aircraft carrier to be independently analyzed by scientists without any self-interest in promoting the “super technology” interpretation of what was recorded.

Wtf??????

The video was released to the public by the Navy and the Navy says it’s real and they don’t know what it was. It’s not being promoted by anything.

[MumblesBadly]

Its not out of the realm of possibility [that there were a few crashes imo. Supposedly ufos have access to worm holes. I believe there is an area 51 that has crashed wreckage of ufos and there was reverse engineering going on. Govt probably has another base then studio 54. Universe is extremely vas pretty likely there is some type of intelligence that is superior to our own.

Hate to burst your bubble, but such wormholes are no longer really consistent with our current most highly tested physics models of the universe. Watch this video by a theoretical physicist to get an idea why, as well as why popular press news stories about theoretical models that purport to show how they are possible are merely mathematical exercises that rely upon contorted and strained conditions that have essentially zero chance of being feasible.

[MumblesBadly]

Thank you, but I’ll wait for the video and data recorded by the aircraft carrier to be independently analyzed by scientists without any self-interest in promoting the “super technology” interpretation of what was recorded.

Wtf??????

The video was released to the public by the Navy and the Navy says it’s real and they don’t know what it was. It’s not being promoted by anything.

Are you talking about one of the three videos released last spring by the Pentagon that got a lot of press coverage as possible proof of super technology beyond what we currently have?

[nightmarefish]

Wtf??????

The video was released to the public by the Navy and the Navy says it’s real and they don’t know what it was. It’s not being promoted by anything.

Are you talking about one of the three videos released last spring by the Pentagon that got a lot of press coverage as possible proof of super technology beyond what we currently have?

It was released by the DOD I believe, not sure why that’s relevant. Take 15 minutes and listen to what the pilot has to say, what do you have to lose? You’ve already spent more time in this thread than that.

[limitles]

i don't know either way...but i am not aware of an area in Japan with mystery similar to Area 51 in the USA...is there a counterpart?

and if not, then the premise that atomic bomb testing attracted the aliens seems less creditable.

I would assume there are many “Area 51s” in the world that the public doesn’t know about.

The US government is admitting there are things flying around our planet with technology that isn’t yet possible here and they don’t know what they are. If not alien to Earth, than what?

You would assume. Ha ha ha. Go ahead assume all you want. You grew up in a culture who gnawed on lead paint as children, fucked their closest cousins, chose to drop nuclear bombs on their own turf and blamed Satan for the results

[FRANKRIZZO]

How do you explain

https://www.amusingplanet.com/2015/0...s-precise.html

[MumblesBadly]

Are you talking about one of the three videos released last spring by the Pentagon that got a lot of press coverage as possible proof of super technology beyond what we currently have?

It was released by the DOD I believe, not sure why that’s relevant. Take 15 minutes and listen to what the pilot has to say, what do you have to lose? You’ve already spent more time in this thread than that.

Dude, you watched the video and listened to their story, in which they apparently describe a particular video that was released by the Navy, but you don’t know which specific video they talk about, and merely “believe” that it was released by the DOD? Do you see the problem with how you are approaching this matter?

Would you approach someone’s claim of having discovered a new and undetectable way of beating the casino at one of their popular games as casually and uncritical as you appeared to have believed their story, and be ready and willing to make a sizeable cash investment with that person in a scheme to make money off of that system without careful and objective verification of that supposed advantage play?

But getting to your question of “why that’s relevant”: Because scientist YouTuber Phil Mason, AKA “Thunderf00t”, has shown that the things seen in all three of the videos released by the DOD last spring can be explained by understandable known phenomena, and which I’ve already posted in the thread about those DOD videos that you created last year.

https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...e-gives-a-shit

[nightmarefish]

It was released by the DOD I believe, not sure why that’s relevant. Take 15 minutes and listen to what the pilot has to say, what do you have to lose? You’ve already spent more time in this thread than that.

Dude, you watched the video and listened to their story, in which they apparently describe a particular video that was released by the Navy, but you don’t know which specific video they talk about, and merely “believe” that it was released by the DOD? Do you see the problem with how you are approaching this matter? Would you approach someone’s claim of having discovered a new and undetectable way of beating the casino at one of their popular games as casually and uncritical as you appeared to have believed their story, and be ready and willing to make a sizeable cash investment with that person in a scheme to make money off of that system without careful and objective verification of that supposed advantage play?

They show the video during the interview. You still didn’t watch it? Why waste your time in the thread?

Navy video released of UFO, pilot that investigated UFO and saw it first hand interviewed. This isn’t complicated. The UFO is real. Unless you think the Navy has made it up. To that I say, why?

[limitles]

It was released by the DOD I believe, not sure why that’s relevant. Take 15 minutes and listen to what the pilot has to say, what do you have to lose? You’ve already spent more time in this thread than that.

Dude, you watched the video and listened to their story, in which they apparently describe a particular video that was released by the Navy, but you don’t know which specific video they talk about, and merely “believe” that it was released by the DOD? Do you see the problem with how you are approaching this matter?

Would you approach someone’s claim of having discovered a new and undetectable way of beating the casino at one of their popular games as casually and uncritical as you appeared to have believed their story, and be ready and willing to make a sizeable cash investment with that person in a scheme to make money off of that system without careful and objective verification of that supposed advantage play?

https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...e-gives-a-shit

No he doesn't, yes he would
He's an idiot

[MumblesBadly]

Dude, you watched the video and listened to their story, in which they apparently describe a particular video that was released by the Navy, but you don’t know which specific video they talk about, and merely “believe” that it was released by the DOD? Do you see the problem with how you are approaching this matter? Would you approach someone’s claim of having discovered a new and undetectable way of beating the casino at one of their popular games as casually and uncritical as you appeared to have believed their story, and be ready and willing to make a sizeable cash investment with that person in a scheme to make money off of that system without careful and objective verification of that supposed advantage play?

They show the video during the interview. You still didn’t watch it? Why waste your time in the thread?

Navy video released of UFO, pilot that investigated UFO and saw it first hand interviewed. This isn’t complicated. The UFO is real. Unless you think the Navy has made it up. To that I say, why?

Because scientist YouTuber Phil Mason, AKA “Thunderf00t”, has shown that the things seen in all three of the videos released by the DOD last spring can be explained by understandable known phenomena, and which I’ve already posted in the thread about those DOD videos that you created last year.

https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...e-gives-a-shit

Did you watch his videos? Or are you just going to gullibly and uncritically believe Joe Rogan’s guests’ claim that it has to be due to “super technology” or some such thing?

[nightmarefish]

They show the video during the interview. You still didn’t watch it? Why waste your time in the thread?

Navy video released of UFO, pilot that investigated UFO and saw it first hand interviewed. This isn’t complicated. The UFO is real. Unless you think the Navy has made it up. To that I say, why?

Because scientist YouTuber Phil Mason, AKA “Thunderf00t”, has shown that the things seen in all three of the videos released by the DOD last spring can be explained by understandable known phenomena, and which I’ve already posted in the thread about those DOD videos that you created last year.

https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...e-gives-a-shit

Did you watch his videos? Or are you just going to gullibly and uncritically believe Joe Rogan’s guests’ claim that it has to be due to “super technology” or some such thing?

So you’re believing a YouTube video over the navy and the pilot that was there who is actually explaining what is happening on the radar video? You can also go to YouTube and they can convince people JFKjr is alive and Michelle Obama is a man.

[MumblesBadly]

Because scientist YouTuber Phil Mason, AKA “Thunderf00t”, has shown that the things seen in all three of the videos released by the DOD last spring can be explained by understandable known phenomena, and which I’ve already posted in the thread about those DOD videos that you created last year.

https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...e-gives-a-shit

Did you watch his videos? Or are you just going to gullibly and uncritically believe Joe Rogan’s guests’ claim that it has to be due to “super technology” or some such thing?

So you’re believing a YouTube video over the navy and the pilot that was there who is actually explaining what is happening on the radar video? You can also go to YouTube and they can convince people JFKjr is alive and Michelle Obama is a man.

You numbnuts!!! I don’t “believe a YouTube video”! I watched his videos and followed his very careful and detailed explanations and found them credible. Phil Mason/Thunderf00t is trained as a chemistry researcher with a strong background in physics, and lays out all of the details of his arguments for others to question or challenge. And if someone finds and points out a critical mistake in his calculations or facts in them, he will issue updated or revised arguments in subsequent videos.

And he uses his science and analytical skills to examine and question the credibility of a number of extraordinary claims made by product hucksters. He recently posted a quite illuminating one about SpaceX, and presents a credible argument that SpaceX is using overpriced launch contracts with the US military to subsidize undercutting the market price of private space launches, and not because it can drastically lower the cost of space launches using reusable rocket technology.

[nightmarefish]

So you’re believing a YouTube video over the navy and the pilot that was there who is actually explaining what is happening on the radar video? You can also go to YouTube and they can convince people JFKjr is alive and Michelle Obama is a man.

You numbnuts!!! I don’t “believe a YouTube video”! I watched his videos and followed his very careful and detailed explanations and found them credible. Phil Mason/Thunderf00t is trained as a chemistry researcher with a strong background in physics, and lays out all of the details of his arguments for others to question or challenge. And if someone finds and points out a critical mistake in his calculations or facts in them, he will issue updated or revised arguments in subsequent videos.

And he uses his science and analytical skills to examine and question the credibility of a number of extraordinary claims made by product hucksters. He recently posted a quite illuminating one about SpaceX, and presents a credible argument that SpaceX is using overpriced launch contracts with the US military to subsidize undercutting the market price of private space launches.

And you think he’s smarter than the entire Navy who say they have no clue what is on their radars? JFC man. If it was something easily explained away you don’t think they have people/resources to come to the same conclusions as Mr. Wizard YouTube guy?

The Navy saying they’re seeing aircrafts flying around which they have no explanation for should mean something to you. Or you think it’s common for the Navy not to know what’s on their radars?

[limitles]

You numbnuts!!! I don’t “believe a YouTube video”! I watched his videos and followed his very careful and detailed explanations and found them credible. Phil Mason/Thunderf00t is trained as a chemistry researcher with a strong background in physics, and lays out all of the details of his arguments for others to question or challenge. And if someone finds and points out a critical mistake in his calculations or facts in them, he will issue updated or revised arguments in subsequent videos.

And he uses his science and analytical skills to examine and question the credibility of a number of extraordinary claims made by product hucksters. He recently posted a quite illuminating one about SpaceX, and presents a credible argument that SpaceX is using overpriced launch contracts with the US military to subsidize undercutting the market price of private space launches.

And you think he’s smarter than the entire Navy who say they have no clue what is on their radars? JFC man. If it was something easily explained away you don’t think they have people/resources to come to the same conclusions as Mr. Wizard YouTube guy?

The Navy saying they’re seeing aircrafts flying around which they have no explanation for should mean something to you. Or you think it’s common for the Navy not to know what’s on their radars?

You extrapolate a Navy pilot's experience to alien existence? No disrespect but a high school grad seeing something is not proof of anything. We don't even know how the brains of elite people work never mind those of a high school grad

Even if you believe your stupid story/stories, you god fearing freaks, will that change your daily activities? Not unless you're completely unglued. So shut the fuck up

Dig a fucking hole and suffocate yourself you
ignorant life form

I hope you understand the message. Smart people are not want for the military.
It's dumb.
Don't quote me no military wisdom you idiot