Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 138

Thread: Apparently Bart Hanson hates free speech (Parler and Twitter censorship issue)

  1. #101
    Platinum gimmick's Avatar
    Reputation
    463
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    2,665
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Sure. Every right wing org is Proud Boys and any stick that goes boom is an AR.

  2. #102
    Platinum mickeycrimm's Avatar
    Reputation
    281
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    2,795
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by gimmick View Post
    Sure. Every right wing org is Proud Boys and any stick that goes boom is an AR.
    Andy Ngo says Pacific Northwest Youth Liberation Front is Antifa.

     
    Comments
      
      dwai: don't bother with gimmick man
    POKER FAG ALERT! POKER FAG ALERT! FOR GAY SEX CONTACT SLOPPY JOE.

  3. #103
    Diamond dwai's Avatar
    Reputation
    1653
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    7,855
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Name:  1610909047571.jpg
Views: 238
Size:  97.8 KB

     
    Comments
      
      splitthis: Lol
      
      big dick: LOL
      
      mickeycrimm:

  4. #104
    Platinum duped_samaritan's Avatar
    Reputation
    689
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,680
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by gimmick View Post
    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...reene-n1254557

    "The account referenced has been temporarily locked out for multiple violations of our civic integrity policy," a Twitter spokesperson said.

    She got caught when they were purging Qanon related tard accounts.

    Feel free to report any leftwing accounts for ToS infringements.
    Yes, I can feel free to report any left wing (or foreign) accounts for ToS infringements.

    EXCEPT....

    There have been ZERO prominent left wing leaders banned.

    There have been ZERO prominent foreign leaders banned, even ones calling for violence.

    There have been ZERO warnings of "inaccurate" or "misleading" placed upon any left-wing tweets.

    I'm sure this is because the only misbehavior on Twitter occurs on the right, and not because a crazy SJW is now in charge of the day-to-day operations of the place. Oh, and remember when Martina Navratilova, famous lesbian tennis player, got banned in 2019 for stating that she didn't feel trans women should be playing in women's sports leagues?

    The woke censors are coming for you at Twitter! But I'm sure gimmick thinks they do a great job enforcing their ToS equally.
    Druff, These bans aren't because of their opinions on healthcare and abortion.
    They tried to violently overthrow the government by spreading misinformation and promoting their 'stop the steal' rally on social media.
    An angry mob stormed the capital, broke into lawmakers offices, were literally trying to hunt down the VP and Speaker of the House.

    You really think the left has done anything on the same level?

     
    Comments
      
      MumblesBadly: Exactly

  5. #105
    Diamond dwai's Avatar
    Reputation
    1653
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    7,855
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by duped_samaritan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post

    Yes, I can feel free to report any left wing (or foreign) accounts for ToS infringements.

    EXCEPT....

    There have been ZERO prominent left wing leaders banned.

    There have been ZERO prominent foreign leaders banned, even ones calling for violence.

    There have been ZERO warnings of "inaccurate" or "misleading" placed upon any left-wing tweets.

    I'm sure this is because the only misbehavior on Twitter occurs on the right, and not because a crazy SJW is now in charge of the day-to-day operations of the place. Oh, and remember when Martina Navratilova, famous lesbian tennis player, got banned in 2019 for stating that she didn't feel trans women should be playing in women's sports leagues?

    The woke censors are coming for you at Twitter! But I'm sure gimmick thinks they do a great job enforcing their ToS equally.
    Druff, These bans aren't because of their opinions on healthcare and abortion.
    They tried to violently overthrow the government by spreading misinformation and promoting their 'stop the steal' rally on social media.
    An angry mob stormed the capital, broke into lawmakers offices, were literally trying to hunt down the VP and Speaker of the House.

    You really think the left has done anything on the same level?
    Name:  3000.jpg
Views: 251
Size:  122.0 KB

     
    Comments
      
      splitthis: Never gets old

  6. #106
    100% Organic MumblesBadly's Avatar
    Reputation
    94
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In the many threads of this forum
    Posts
    9,408
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by duped_samaritan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post

    Yes, I can feel free to report any left wing (or foreign) accounts for ToS infringements.

    EXCEPT....

    There have been ZERO prominent left wing leaders banned.

    There have been ZERO prominent foreign leaders banned, even ones calling for violence.

    There have been ZERO warnings of "inaccurate" or "misleading" placed upon any left-wing tweets.

    I'm sure this is because the only misbehavior on Twitter occurs on the right, and not because a crazy SJW is now in charge of the day-to-day operations of the place. Oh, and remember when Martina Navratilova, famous lesbian tennis player, got banned in 2019 for stating that she didn't feel trans women should be playing in women's sports leagues?

    The woke censors are coming for you at Twitter! But I'm sure gimmick thinks they do a great job enforcing their ToS equally.
    Druff, These bans aren't because of their opinions on healthcare and abortion.
    They tried to violently overthrow the government by spreading misinformation and promoting their 'stop the steal' rally on social media.
    An angry mob stormed the capital, broke into lawmakers offices, were literally trying to hunt down the VP and Speaker of the House.

    You really think the left has done anything on the same level?
    The issue of the Twitter bans is discussed cogently in this commentary by Brian Tyler Cohen.

     
    Comments
      
      mickeycrimm: you mean non-cogently
    _____________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I actually hope this [second impeachment] succeeds, because I want Trump put down politically like a sick, 14-year-old dog. ... I don't want him complicating the 2024 primary season. I just want him done.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Were Republicans cowardly or unethical not to go along with [convicting Trump in the second impeachment Senate trial]? No. The smart move was to reject it.

  7. #107
    Platinum mickeycrimm's Avatar
    Reputation
    281
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    2,795
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by duped_samaritan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post

    Yes, I can feel free to report any left wing (or foreign) accounts for ToS infringements.

    EXCEPT....

    There have been ZERO prominent left wing leaders banned.

    There have been ZERO prominent foreign leaders banned, even ones calling for violence.

    There have been ZERO warnings of "inaccurate" or "misleading" placed upon any left-wing tweets.

    I'm sure this is because the only misbehavior on Twitter occurs on the right, and not because a crazy SJW is now in charge of the day-to-day operations of the place. Oh, and remember when Martina Navratilova, famous lesbian tennis player, got banned in 2019 for stating that she didn't feel trans women should be playing in women's sports leagues?

    The woke censors are coming for you at Twitter! But I'm sure gimmick thinks they do a great job enforcing their ToS equally.
    Druff, These bans aren't because of their opinions on healthcare and abortion.
    They tried to violently overthrow the government by spreading misinformation and promoting their 'stop the steal' rally on social media.
    An angry mob stormed the capital, broke into lawmakers offices, were literally trying to hunt down the VP and Speaker of the House.

    You really think the left has done anything on the same level?
    The left is much worse. 9 months of riots. Multi-Billions in property damage. 47 people killed. Hundreds of cops injured. Thousands of businesses ruined. Economic zones in big cities are now blighted areas with no activity. And the far left isn't through. They will continue rioting for the forseeable future.
    POKER FAG ALERT! POKER FAG ALERT! FOR GAY SEX CONTACT SLOPPY JOE.

  8. #108
    Platinum duped_samaritan's Avatar
    Reputation
    689
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,680
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by duped_samaritan View Post
    Druff, These bans aren't because of their opinions on healthcare and abortion.
    They tried to violently overthrow the government by spreading misinformation and promoting their 'stop the steal' rally on social media.
    An angry mob stormed the capital, broke into lawmakers offices, were literally trying to hunt down the VP and Speaker of the House.

    You really think the left has done anything on the same level?
    The left is much worse. 9 months of riots. Multi-Billions in property damage. 47 people killed. Hundreds of cops injured. Thousands of businesses ruined. Economic zones in big cities are now blighted areas with no activity. And the far left isn't through. They will continue rioting for the forseeable future.
    And if the violent protests (most were not violent) had a leader that was openly organizing/promoting/hyping them on twitter in a way that resulted in more violence, they would be banned also. And you wouldn't be bitching about it even a little bit.

    Seriously, imagine for one second that AOC riled up an angry mob that went and stormed the capital and Twitter banned her for it. How would your reaction differ from Trump being banned.
    Last edited by duped_samaritan; 01-18-2021 at 03:47 PM.

  9. #109
    Diamond Walter Sobchak's Avatar
    Reputation
    1243
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Bowling Alley
    Posts
    8,875
    Load Metric
    65655623
    I don't think Twitter should be able to ban Trump or anyone else. I think private policing of the public discourse is dangerous. But to get to that place we need an overhaul of how the internet is regulated.

    For decades Republicans have been on the side of corporate power and private enterprise to act as they wish.

    To undo that the internet needs to be regulated as a utility meaning net neutrality rules back in place.

    That's not all Republicans have done. A doctor can legally prescribe a drug to a woman and a pharmacist has a right to refuse to fill it because they have a "moral objection." Too fucking bad. Don't be a pharmacist if you don't want to fill prescriptions. For women in rural or heavily religious areas it may not be easy to go to a different pharmacy, and she shouldn't have to.

    A huge employer (Hobby Lobby) can deny contraceptive coverage required by law to thousands of employees because of the owners' religious beliefs. Apparently the distinction between a corporation and its owners suddenly disappears when there's an opportunity to make life difficult for women.

    This is the world the Republicans have created through the courts. Almost limitless privilege for private enterprise at the expense of the public good.

    So when we undo those, then Trump can have his Twitter account back. Until then, you made your bed and now you can lie in it.

    SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798

    PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL

  10. #110
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by duped_samaritan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post

    Yes, I can feel free to report any left wing (or foreign) accounts for ToS infringements.

    EXCEPT....

    There have been ZERO prominent left wing leaders banned.

    There have been ZERO prominent foreign leaders banned, even ones calling for violence.

    There have been ZERO warnings of "inaccurate" or "misleading" placed upon any left-wing tweets.

    I'm sure this is because the only misbehavior on Twitter occurs on the right, and not because a crazy SJW is now in charge of the day-to-day operations of the place. Oh, and remember when Martina Navratilova, famous lesbian tennis player, got banned in 2019 for stating that she didn't feel trans women should be playing in women's sports leagues?

    The woke censors are coming for you at Twitter! But I'm sure gimmick thinks they do a great job enforcing their ToS equally.
    Druff, These bans aren't because of their opinions on healthcare and abortion.
    They tried to violently overthrow the government by spreading misinformation and promoting their 'stop the steal' rally on social media.
    An angry mob stormed the capital, broke into lawmakers offices, were literally trying to hunt down the VP and Speaker of the House.

    You really think the left has done anything on the same level?
    I don't recall the NY Post trying to overthrow the government when writing about Hunter Biden's laptop.

    Somehow they got banned, as did anyone who tried to link the story.

  11. #111
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak View Post
    I don't think Twitter should be able to ban Trump or anyone else. I think private policing of the public discourse is dangerous. But to get to that place we need an overhaul of how the internet is regulated.

    For decades Republicans have been on the side of corporate power and private enterprise to act as they wish.

    To undo that the internet needs to be regulated as a utility meaning net neutrality rules back in place.

    That's not all Republicans have done. A doctor can legally prescribe a drug to a woman and a pharmacist has a right to refuse to fill it because they have a "moral objection." Too fucking bad. Don't be a pharmacist if you don't want to fill prescriptions. For women in rural or heavily religious areas it may not be easy to go to a different pharmacy, and she shouldn't have to.

    A huge employer (Hobby Lobby) can deny contraceptive coverage required by law to thousands of employees because of the owners' religious beliefs. Apparently the distinction between a corporation and its owners suddenly disappears when there's an opportunity to make life difficult for women.

    This is the world the Republicans have created through the courts. Almost limitless privilege for private enterprise at the expense of the public good.

    So when we undo those, then Trump can have his Twitter account back. Until then, you made your bed and now you can lie in it.
    You started off well, then went into the weeds.

    Your first line is correct -- and the most important. Public officials should not be silenced by huge private companies.

    However, then you make all kinds of false equivalence to other controversial rights granted to private businesses which have nothing to do with public discourse. These are all complicated and separate legal issues which deserve debate, but Democrats should not support censorship of Republican elected officials as punishment for previous decisions they didn't like.

    Sanlmar used to laugh at me when I talked about "intelligent light regulation", but I actually believe that's the key here. I don't want to see Twitter and Facebook heavily regulated, but at the same time, a complete lack of regulation has resulted in disaster regarding ideology-based censorship and suppression.

    I have already stated the rules I'd like to see put into law for large social media, regarding censorship:

    - No banning or censorship of major elected public officials, with the exception of temp banning when it's clear their account has been hacked.

    - No warning labels are allowed for misinformation on messages posted by duly elected public officials.

    - No suppression of stories by any large, established form of news media. No warning labels may be on these stories, either.

    This won't completely solve the problem, but it will be a big step to at least curb some of the immense censorship power wielded (and abused) by large social media.

     
    Comments
      
      MumblesBadly: Then start you own social media company and make those the rules.
      
      splitthis: Offset bigtime

  12. #112
    Diamond Walter Sobchak's Avatar
    Reputation
    1243
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Bowling Alley
    Posts
    8,875
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak View Post
    I don't think Twitter should be able to ban Trump or anyone else. I think private policing of the public discourse is dangerous. But to get to that place we need an overhaul of how the internet is regulated.

    For decades Republicans have been on the side of corporate power and private enterprise to act as they wish.

    To undo that the internet needs to be regulated as a utility meaning net neutrality rules back in place.

    That's not all Republicans have done. A doctor can legally prescribe a drug to a woman and a pharmacist has a right to refuse to fill it because they have a "moral objection." Too fucking bad. Don't be a pharmacist if you don't want to fill prescriptions. For women in rural or heavily religious areas it may not be easy to go to a different pharmacy, and she shouldn't have to.

    A huge employer (Hobby Lobby) can deny contraceptive coverage required by law to thousands of employees because of the owners' religious beliefs. Apparently the distinction between a corporation and its owners suddenly disappears when there's an opportunity to make life difficult for women.

    This is the world the Republicans have created through the courts. Almost limitless privilege for private enterprise at the expense of the public good.

    So when we undo those, then Trump can have his Twitter account back. Until then, you made your bed and now you can lie in it.
    You started off well, then went into the weeds.

    Your first line is correct -- and the most important. Public officials should not be silenced by huge private companies.

    However, then you make all kinds of false equivalence to other controversial rights granted to private businesses which have nothing to do with public discourse. These are all complicated and separate legal issues which deserve debate, but Democrats should not support censorship of Republican elected officials as punishment for previous decisions they didn't like.

    Sanlmar used to laugh at me when I talked about "intelligent light regulation", but I actually believe that's the key here. I don't want to see Twitter and Facebook heavily regulated, but at the same time, a complete lack of regulation has resulted in disaster regarding ideology-based censorship and suppression.

    I have already stated the rules I'd like to see put into law for large social media, regarding censorship:

    - No banning or censorship of major elected public officials, with the exception of temp banning when it's clear their account has been hacked.

    - No warning labels are allowed for misinformation on messages posted by duly elected public officials.

    - No suppression of stories by any large, established form of news media. No warning labels may be on these stories, either.

    This won't completely solve the problem, but it will be a big step to at least curb some of the immense censorship power wielded (and abused) by large social media.
    It's not a quid pro quo. The issue is how much control corporations should have over our lives. They shouldn't be able to shut people out of the public square, and they shouldn't be able to dictate who can use birth control or a morning-after pill either.

     
    Comments
      
      IamGreek: 1st thing you have ever said that makes sense. Keep up the good work!

    SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798

    PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL

  13. #113
    Platinum duped_samaritan's Avatar
    Reputation
    689
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,680
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by duped_samaritan View Post
    Druff, These bans aren't because of their opinions on healthcare and abortion.
    They tried to violently overthrow the government by spreading misinformation and promoting their 'stop the steal' rally on social media.
    An angry mob stormed the capital, broke into lawmakers offices, were literally trying to hunt down the VP and Speaker of the House.

    You really think the left has done anything on the same level?
    I don't recall the NY Post trying to overthrow the government when writing about Hunter Biden's laptop.

    Somehow they got banned, as did anyone who tried to link the story.
    And then they got unbanned a few days later and Twitter explained why they were banned and why they changed their mind and the policy they changed about hacked material.

    Ironic considering the thread you just started about unbanning the users you banned a few days ago.

  14. #114
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by duped_samaritan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post

    I don't recall the NY Post trying to overthrow the government when writing about Hunter Biden's laptop.

    Somehow they got banned, as did anyone who tried to link the story.
    And then they got unbanned a few days later and Twitter explained why they were banned and why they changed their mind and the policy they changed about hacked material.

    Ironic considering the thread you just started about unbanning the users you banned a few days ago.
    Actually, they didn't get unbanned a few days later!

    They were told that they had to delete their post if they wanted to get unbanned, but were "welcome to repost the same thing".

    They made some bullshit excuse how the system worked that way, and it was impossible to do otherwise -- which is complete bullshit, and anyone with a technical background understands that.

    Are you saying you believe that "hacked materials" BS? Do you really think that's why they did it? If they were so concerned with articles based upon stolen/hacked materials, why did they allow the NY Times article about Trump's stolen tax returns? You realize it's a pretty serious crime to access someone else's tax return without their permission, right?

  15. #115
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
    Then start you own social media company and make those the rules.
    Someone tried that. It was called "Parler". You saw what happened to them.

  16. #116
    Speedster Out of Clemson adamantium's Avatar
    Reputation
    890
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    3,397
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
    Then start you own social media company and make those the rules.
    Someone tried that. It was called "Parler". You saw what happened to them.
    Who is denying Parler to buy their own servers and set up shop?

     
    Comments
      
      MumblesBadly: Exactly. Get busy raising money, Druff.
    Slava Ukraini!

  17. #117
    Diamond dwai's Avatar
    Reputation
    1653
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    7,855
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Name:  b626024.jpg
Views: 204
Size:  136.9 KB

  18. #118
    Platinum mickeycrimm's Avatar
    Reputation
    281
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    2,795
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by duped_samaritan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    The left is much worse. 9 months of riots. Multi-Billions in property damage. 47 people killed. Hundreds of cops injured. Thousands of businesses ruined. Economic zones in big cities are now blighted areas with no activity. And the far left isn't through. They will continue rioting for the forseeable future.
    And if the violent protests (most were not violent) had a leader that was openly organizing/promoting/hyping them on twitter in a way that resulted in more violence, they would be banned also. And you wouldn't be bitching about it even a little bit.

    Seriously, imagine for one second that AOC riled up an angry mob that went and stormed the capital and Twitter banned her for it. How would your reaction differ from Trump being banned.
    Antifa, BLM advertised their riots beforehand on twitter to get people to show up. Where was your butt-boy, Jack Dorsey, then?
    POKER FAG ALERT! POKER FAG ALERT! FOR GAY SEX CONTACT SLOPPY JOE.

  19. #119
    Platinum mickeycrimm's Avatar
    Reputation
    281
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    2,795
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by adamantium View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post

    Someone tried that. It was called "Parler". You saw what happened to them.
    Who is denying Parler to buy their own servers and set up shop?
    Then don't tell private companies that under penalty of law they have to bake a cake for a wedding.

     
    Comments
      
      splitthis:
    POKER FAG ALERT! POKER FAG ALERT! FOR GAY SEX CONTACT SLOPPY JOE.

  20. #120
    Diamond Walter Sobchak's Avatar
    Reputation
    1243
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Bowling Alley
    Posts
    8,875
    Load Metric
    65655623
    Quote Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by adamantium View Post

    Who is denying Parler to buy their own servers and set up shop?
    Then don't tell private companies that under penalty of law they have to bake a cake for a wedding.
    Nobody is telling them that. They won their case.

    SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798

    PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Bart Hanson - how much did you lose investing in that JEWISH restaurant?
    By snake_in_the_ass in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 05-18-2023, 10:36 PM
  2. Calling out Bart Hanson
    By IAmProfessionalTalk in forum Scams, Scandals, and Shadiness
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 02-23-2023, 07:18 PM
  3. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-04-2020, 11:27 AM
  4. Jeff Madsen versus Bart Hanson on Twitter
    By Dan Druff in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-28-2020, 08:46 AM
  5. Bart Hanson rips an angle shooter on his call-in hand analysis show
    By JohnCommode in forum Scams, Scandals, and Shadiness
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-17-2020, 02:43 PM