Yeah it's "who the fuck cares" unless you're the victim of shit like this. Then I imagine you'd care.
Would you be cool if you had a sister who was followed home by a stranger at a nightclub, who then went into her backyard and started shouting into her window he's going to rape her? Because none of that would be prosecuted.
And LOL @ not prosecuting resisting arrest. So tough luck on those cops who get attacked when trying to do their job, right? Cops' jobs are hard enough without dealing with assholes resisting. Now people get to resist with zero consequence. Great policy!
It's really, really horrible to have the DA actually state as policy that they won't prosecute certain crimes, especially crimes with victims. It's one thing to have internal guidelines to sometimes not prosecute under certain circumstances. It's a whole different matter to announce that you can commit all kinds of crimes now with no consequence.
Then the non-prosecution of driving with a suspended license, which doesn't seem like a big deal unless you're the one maimed or killed by that driver. There's a reason these people have a suspended license, and a reason they should fear being caught on the road by cops if their license is suspended. This new policy lets them ignore the suspension until something really bad finally happens.
Laws are on the books for a reason -- both as a deterrent and to punishment those who break them. Take away both the deterrent and the punishment, and respect for law breaks down. Minor crimes are still crimes, and often have a real victim.
Doesn't surprise me that our resident Scandinavian leftist approves of these policies, because Scandinavia is also notoriously bad with dealing with crime and punishment. They're just fortunate to have an isolated, mostly homogenous society which hasn't historically had a lot of crime. But once crime gets imported (see Sweden and their
surge of Muslim immigrants), they go to pieces.